Results 31 to 37 of 37
-
12-04-2021, 06:02 PM #31UnregisteredGuest
Well said. Every time you have a use of force your job and freedom are on the line because someone in your COC might look at the video or report and disagree calling it excessive force. Then your goose is cooked as it goes to IAD and the sheriff because they will not back you up. Sheriff Bob Gualtieri might say one thing but when the chips are down he will backstab you in a heartbeat because he is a lawyer politician not a cop.
-
12-06-2021, 10:57 PM #32UnregisteredGuest
The whole administration is based on lies so why pick on this sergeant?
-
12-07-2021, 02:47 AM #33UnregisteredGuest
-
12-07-2021, 08:45 AM #34UnregisteredGuest
-
12-14-2021, 08:17 PM #35
-
12-14-2021, 09:01 PM #36UnregisteredGuest
https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/lo...e/67-376071545
Here's the story. Good thing for her she only tried to poison a co-worker rather than getting a DUI and getting fired. Maybe she can get assigned to the courthouse cafe.
"Officials at the sheriff's office say they have a progressive disciple system that depends on a variety of things, including any prior disciplinary actions. The sheriff makes the final decision."
Apparently DUIs are the only exception to due process. Poisoning is not a termination offense even though it is a first degree felony. Wonder if Car1 would have been that lenient if someone had tried to poison him.
-
06-05-2022, 11:22 PM #37
- Join Date
- May 2022
- Posts
- 11
I've worked both the jail and the road. Yes, patrol should work 4 months every couple of years in the jail. All new hires, doesn't matter if they are applying for the patrol division, should have to do 1-2 years in corrections. It will never happen, The Sheriff hates corrections and doesn't have the backbone, beside no positive press for him. It would give patrol a whole new outlook on corrections.
Ok, as stated let the bit@h fest begain!
Bookmarks