De-annexation of West Villages from North Port coming? - Page 2
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50
 
  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Alright Mr. Know It All...it the waterway makes it continguous...why in the world would the Court and Appellate Court rule that it wasn't? Conclusion...West Villages-1 North Port-0
    Link and court case number please.

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    HAHA gotta love the pandering stunt PD pulled with “showing off” to the grand paradiso residents. “Please don’t annex we will loose all our funding” 😂 looked like a huge crowed.

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It has not gone to the appellate court yet. LOL

    You will lose.
    Shows how much you know...it already has been to the 12th District and Appellate Court already...so the game is over! No need to keep score!

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Link and court case number please.
    Here is the case number...feel free to look it up on Sarasota County Clerk of Court...Clerk Net

    2000 CA 014966 NC

    The City of North Port spent over $1M in legal fees trying to keep their illegally annex property and lost.

    Then the City of North Port annexed the property again...after the 12th District Court and Appellate Court ruled against them. Again, Sarasota County filed suit against them. This time, instead of fighting them over whether or not it was illegal, they entered into an interlocal agreement, whereas the County would not have any responsibility for any infrastructure or services. This satisfied the county, as they were already stretched thin with Lakewood Ranch. What it did not do was legitimize the illegal annexation in the first place.

    Hope this information proves useful.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Alright Mr. Know It All...it the waterway makes it continguous...why in the world would the Court and Appellate Court rule that it wasn't? Conclusion...West Villages-1 North Port-0
    De-annexed: 0

    Still a part of the City of North Port: 1

    Put up or shut up! LOL

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    De-annexed: 0

    Still a part of the City of North Port: 1

    Put up or shut up! LOL
    Won’t be for long sunshine. Your in for a rude awakening. It’s 100% going to happen regardless of “popular opinion” at nppd. Going to have to sell some of those unmarked cars.

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Won’t be for long sunshine. Your in for a rude awakening. It’s 100% going to happen regardless of “popular opinion” at nppd. Going to have to sell some of those unmarked cars.
    Put up or shut up buttercup.

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    De-annexed: 0

    Still a part of the City of North Port: 1

    Put up or shut up! LOL
    Hopefully the petitioner will not become suicidal when he is forced to remain a city resident. If so, then Baker Acting his is an option for his own safety.

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Hopefully the petitioner will not become suicidal when he is forced to remain a city resident. If so, then Baker Acting him is an option (for his own safety).
    The de-annexation petition is being driven by one man and if he does not get his way, then what will he do next?

  10. #20
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Stroke out????

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •