Attention Andrew Sheets - Page 4
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33
 
  1. #31
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by MOD 1 View Post
    That is completely wrong. The Sheriff's Office filed in Hillsborough County which was the correct venue back then.

    Mod 1
    The Sheriff intentionally filed bogus paperwork to make it look like there was a court ruling to block you from having to disclose IP's. Did you guys work together on that? If the case is important enough for a lawyer to spend the time on it, you can and will be forced to.

  2. #32
    litigation 101
    Guest

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The Sheriff intentionally filed bogus paperwork to make it look like there was a court ruling to block you from having to disclose IP's. Did you guys work together on that? If the case is important enough for a lawyer to spend the time on it, you can and will be forced to.
    Here are a few questions for you:

    • Why should the owners of leoaffairs allow Andrew Sheets to make argumentative posts at leoaffairs?
      .
    • Why does Andrew Sheets want the IPs of anonymous posters at leoaffairs who responded to his argumentative anti-cop posts (before he was banned)?
      .
    • Why should the owners of leoaffairs allow Andrew Sheets to post links to an anti-cop website, specifically to "copwatch"?
      .
    • Why doesn't Andrew Sheets simply create his own anti-cop chat forum, where can can post uncensored anti-cop allegations?
      .
    • What is Andrew Sheets motivation in visiting a cop website to post anti-cop insults?

  3. #33
    Administrator LEO Affairs Colonel MOD 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,496
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The Sheriff intentionally filed bogus paperwork to make it look like there was a court ruling to block you from having to disclose IP's. Did you guys work together on that? If the case is important enough for a lawyer to spend the time on it, you can and will be forced to.
    Sorry, not according to the Court of Appeals.

    Mod 1
    Mod 1

    http://WWW.LEOAFFAIRS.COM

    Terms Of Use

    The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments posted in a
    courthouse is this: You cannot post "Thou Shalt Not Steal," "Thou Shalt
    Not Commit Adultery," and "Thou Shall Not Lie" in a building full of
    lawyers, judges and politicians...It creates a hostile work environment.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •