Sheriff Tom Knight & Deputy Frank Bybee & Attempted Murder?

[Unregistered]

It's a sad day in Sarasota.

Full story:
http://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20...tempted-murder

Public relations video:
http://www.wtsp.com/news/sarasota-de...arge/391280312

Sheriff Tom Knight stated that Deputy Frank Bybee had nothing "glamorous" in his career? Frankie was on the SWAT team for a long time and he was an undercover narcotics detective, both of which are in my opinion "glamorous". I am somewhat confused? Sheriff Knight knew Bybee was on SWAT and was part of the "good old boys club". He also knew that Bybee was in one of the most "glamorous" units at the Sheriff's Office (deep cover). Could there be other connections?

Bybee also had numerous IAs when he was in Special Investigations. The real questions are:

• Are there others involved in this with Bybee and who all knew what he was doing?
• How many elderly people have been exploited if any?
• What is the Sheriff hiding by not stating that Bybee was an undercover operative and SWAT Team Member?

Your questions will never be answered. However, the best place to start is on the 2nd floor. Look at the remaining histories of Knight’s captains (aka his 2nd floor inner circle). If the media starts investigating their histories first, then it will unlock Pandora’s box.

For example, we have command staff (captains or above) with the following histories:

• Multiple command staff employees failing lie detector tests. Knight still promoted all of them to captain and above. They are still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• One captain lied multiple times under oath during a single IA investigation. Knight still promoted him to captain. He is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• One deputy encouraged another deputy to lie under oath during an official investigation. Knight still promoted the deputy to captain. Both of them are still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• Felony theft of a boat. He admitted to it. He was still promoted by Knight and he is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• Theft of pornography from a store. He admitted to it. Did he masturbate with it? He was not asked that question during the polygraph. He was still promoted by Knight and he is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• And lots more that only insiders know about…

If Knight really wanted to clean house, he would not have promoted these immoral men into his 2nd floor inner circle. They are the captains (and above) who are running the agency! What kind of moral or immoral decisions do you think they are routinely making?

Frank Bybee was a rankless deputy who “broke ranks” by suing Knight – so Knight had solid political reasons to go after him – in addition to the fact that Bybee is obviously a hardened criminal. The posted video is a “public relations” opportunity to make it look like Knight is cleaning house. Meanwhile, Knight’s executive staff (aka “promoted perps”) are still gainfully employed in Knight’s inner circle on the 2nd floor, making moral or immoral decisions, as it suits them.

Bybee’s gone, but the 2nd floor remains. Now you know the rest of the story.

[Unregistered]

Being a deputy did not make Bybee a good man. Similarly, being the elected sheriff doesn't make Knight a good or an honest man. "Positional authority" does not make someone good or bad. Both Knight and Bybee remain what they are. Bask in the public limelight while it lasts.

[Unregistered]

That's the most dangerous circus act ever presented at the Sarasota County sheriffs office. Neither the high wire act, nor lions and tigers and bears can even come close to that classless act! But wait!!!! Is there more??? Stay tuned for more announcements from the ringmaster!!!!

[Unregistered]

Being a deputy did not make Bybee a good man. Similarly, being the elected sheriff doesn't make Knight a good or an honest man. "Positional authority" does not make someone good or bad. Both Knight and Bybee remain what they are. Bask in the public limelight while it lasts.

Since Knight has been arrested they are both criminals. Had Bybee not angered him, he'd sweep it all under the rug. He's no Grady Judd either.

[Unregistered]

Being a deputy did not make Bybee a good man. Similarly, being the elected sheriff doesn't make Knight a good or an honest man. "Positional authority" does not make someone good or bad. Both Knight and Bybee remain what they are. Bask in the public limelight while it lasts.

One sociopath wants to get public praise for arresting the other sociopath, so he told us to film him escorting him to the jail. For public recognition, did he also sign the PCA as the arresting officer?

[Unregistered]

It's a sad day in Sarasota.

Look at the histories of Knight’s captains (aka his 2nd floor inner circle). If the media starts investigating their histories first, then it will unlock Pandora’s box.

For example, we have command staff (captains or above) with the following histories:

• Multiple command staff employees failing lie detector tests. Knight still promoted all of them to captain and above. They are still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• One captain lied multiple times under oath during a single IA investigation. Knight still promoted him to captain. He is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• One deputy encouraged another deputy to lie under oath during an official investigation. Knight still promoted the deputy to captain. Both of them are still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• Felony theft of a boat. He admitted to it. He was still promoted by Knight and he is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• Theft of pornography from a store. He admitted to it. Did he masturbate with it? He was not asked that question during the polygraph. He was still promoted by Knight and he is still employed at the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office.
• And lots more that only insiders know about…

If Knight really wanted to clean house, he would not have promoted these immoral men into his 2nd floor inner circle. They are the captains (and above) who are running the agency! What kind of moral or immoral decisions do you think they are routinely making?

Frank Bybee was a rankless deputy who “broke ranks” by suing Knight – so Knight had solid political reasons to go after him – in addition to the fact that Bybee is obviously a hardened criminal. Meanwhile, Knight’s executive staff (aka “promoted perps”) are still gainfully employed in Knight’s inner circle on the 2nd floor, making moral or immoral decisions, as it suits them.

Bybee’s gone, but Knight and his 2nd floor henchmen remain. Now you know the rest of the story.

Does it take an attempted murder to get this stuff properly investigated, instead of having Knight sweep it all under the carpet? It brings back bad memories of the Captain Ron Locke case who was also promoted and protected by Knight. EVEN WORSE: Knight refused to investigate Locke for getting a juvenile pregnant.

[Unregistered]

I know frank and he is a piece of crap Karma got him this time

[Unregistered]

I find it odd that we're actually entertaining this lady that he allegedly did this to. Clearly she has some serious mental health issues, check her history. How many times did she call in within the last few months, threatening to kill herself, and then screwing with the deputies when they got there, denying having just called. Then calling again. Sorry, but her credibility to make such a claim is completely shot, she's a mental case.

[Unregistered]

How many more threads we going to start on this ???? One was started a couple hours before....ridiculous to have multiple threads !

[Unregistered]

I find it odd that we're actually entertaining this lady that he allegedly did this to. Clearly she has some serious mental health issues, check her history. How many times did she call in within the last few months, threatening to kill herself, and then screwing with the deputies when they got there, denying having just called. Then calling again. Sorry, but her credibility to make such a claim is completely shot, she's a mental case.

If she has a documented history of lying to deputies’ multiple times in the past, then it may be material to the current allegation. Names, dates and circumstances need to be documented in a thorough investigation.