Mod 610 question about DL

Mod610 why are you protecting DL? No names mentioned and just a question regarding ethics. We are not allowed to use our cars off duty. Why is he? If I post a video on here of him with her in his car can the posting remain?

[Jim Melo]

Mod610 why are you protecting DL? No names mentioned and just a question regarding ethics. We are not allowed to use our cars off duty. Why is he? If I post a video on here of him with her in his car can the posting remain?

If I give you my email address will you send it to me? I like home movies.

As always my name

Jim

Mod610 why are you protecting DL? No names mentioned and just a question regarding ethics. We are not allowed to use our cars off duty. Why is he? If I post a video on here of him with her in his car can the posting remain?

If I give you my email address will you send it to me? I like home movies.

As always my name

Jim

Hell, he has removed every thing I ever said about Wilfred.

Maybe mod610 is DL

I think he is DL

Look at MODs photo it looks like DL

Yeah, he has erased all comments from the "Prummel's Bankruptcy".

then its gotta be posted again again again again again and again


William G Prummell
Sex: Male
Race: White
Birth Date: 11/1969
Employment History
Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Class: Law Enforcement
Type: Full-Time
Start Date: 12/15/1992
Location: Charlotte County
Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Class: Law Enforcement
Type: Auxiliary
Start Date: 3/3/1992
Location: Charlotte County
Separation: (Separated on 12/15/1992) Transfer Within Agency (No break in service)
Complaints
Perjury
Misuse Of Public Position
Source: Verifiable Complaint
Category: Dis
Status: No Caused by Staff
Opened Date: 1/26/2006
Closed Date: 2/27/2006
No Discipline Imposed
Certificates
Law Enforcement
Status: Active
Valid From: 2/22/1993 to 6/30/2013
Auxiliary Law Enforcement
Status: Inactive - Fully Certified
Valid From: 3/3/1992 to 6/30/2008
Disclaimer: The names in this database include every past and present officer to work in Florida, even those who never faced discipline from the CJSTC. Only the officers with information under 'Complaints' have had one or more cases sent to the CJSTC as of Nov. 2011.

In addition, unless otherwise noted by the word 'misconduct' in the Separation section, all other officers should be presumed to have left in good standing. Other phrases, such as 'Failure to Qualify' or 'Mandatory Retraining,' typically indicate that the officer's certification has lapsed because of retirement or reasons other than misconduct.

The information in this database comes from the FDLE.

Just keep reposting anything they delete. Its a public forum and the truth hurts these guys sometimes.

DL needs to remember his department phone is subject to public record to see the calls.