PDA

View Full Version : learn the Contraband Forfeiture Act



10-22-2006, 01:08 PM
BRADENTON -- For years, the Bradenton Police Department has quietly, without judicial review, confiscated hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash and property from people they arrested for drug possession and other crimes.

The police bypass the courts and confiscate money and property on the spot through a department-created form called the "Contraband Forfeiture Agreement." By signing it, a person agrees to relinquish their property to the police and waive any rights they have to try to get it back through the courts.

In some cases -- including one last year where police seized more than $43,000 from a man during a traffic stop -- people have signed over cash and other property without ever getting charged with a crime.

The cash and revenue from other forfeited property, such as cars, DVDs and TVs, go into a police bank account and is spent on equipment, drug abuse prevention and community-based programs. The bank account has reached $150,000 in recent years.

Attorneys and constitutional law scholars say they are concerned Bradenton police may be pressuring people to sign away property -- and their legal rights -- without an attorney. State laws under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act say a person is entitled to have a judge, not a police officer, determine the merits of forfeiture :roll: .

"Who knows what they are telling people to get them to sign it," said Sarasota-based defense attorney Henry E. Lee, who represented a woman last year in a police forfeiture case in Bradenton. "This is a source of revenue for the police, and it's just rife for abuse."

A Manatee County judge last year found fault with the department's forfeiture procedure in a case where police took more than $7,000 from a woman arrested for a driver's license violation after a traffic stop.

Judge Douglas Henderson said Jicela Baneles, 28, did not knowingly and willingly agree to give up her money -- despite the appearance of her name on the department's forfeiture agreement.

Police were ordered to return the money.

Bradenton Police Chief Michael Radzilowski said Henderson did not dismiss the agreement itself in the Baneles case.

"He didn't say the written agreement wasn't any good," Radzilowski said. "If the courts say we're doing something improper or illegal, we'll change it."

The contraband agreement, which purports to be a binding, legal document, is expected to become the centerpiece of a court fight in Manatee County. A lawsuit filed this week challenges the legitimacy of the forfeiture document.

The case is rooted in the police seizure of $10,020 from a 20-year-old Orlando man, Delane N. Johnson, in July.

Johnson, questioned amid a robbery investigation, was arrested on a rarely used charge of failing to report a business transaction that exceeds $10,000.

But prosecutors said it's not a crime to carry that amount of cash, and the state dropped the charge in August.

Johnson, police say, signed away his rights to the cash and authorities deposited the money in a police account within a week of the arrest.

Police say it will take a court order to get them to return Johnson's cash.

Johnson's attorneys want a judge to force the police department to use the courts in forfeiture cases and to stop negotiating with people as they are arrested.

Bradenton is the only law enforcement agency in the area that doesn't file its forfeiture complaints in court to initiate proceedings.

"Hopefully, we'll put a stop to it when we get in front of a judge," said attorney Louis Daniel Lazaro, who represents Johnson. "There are possible corruption charges on a criminal level."

Police dismiss any notion that they are bullying people into signing away cash and property.

Radzilowski defends the practice, saying a person has a right to decide how to dispose of their property.

"People involved in crime are more apt to walk away from the money," the chief said. "We're not looking to take money from innocent people. We're only trying to take the profit out of the narcotics business."

Radzilowski said very few people who contest forfeiture actually win in court.

Johnson isn't the first person who later had second thoughts about signing their property away, Radzilowski said.

"This is not the first, and it won't be the last legal fight," Radzilowski said.

The bulk of Bradenton's forfeiture cases involve cash and property worth between $50 and $5,000, but occasionally the bounty can be much higher.

In two cases alone last year, police seized more than $100,000.

Police stopped Ezequiel Maldonado for a traffic violation in January 2005 and ended up taking $43,551 from him through a contraband agreement. Court records show Maldonado, 47, was not charged with a crime.

Benji Ackerman Jr., 34, was part of a cocaine distribution ring that city police dismantled last year. Ackerman got an 18-year federal prison sentence in June.

City police got $62,760 from him before he was put away.

Bradenton police reports show that officers have seized $12,638 from 15 people since early August. Most of the people were arrested on drug-related charges.

Janie Brooks, 56, was in her front yard when police swooped in last month to target an area fraught with drug sales.

Brooks was arrested when investigators said they found drugs, and her car and cash were seized.

The incident, Brooks said, happened in a flash, and while she sat in the back of a police cruiser an officer prodded her until she signed over about $1,200 to the Bradenton Police Department.

She said she had no idea what she was signing -- only that police told her that "things would go a lot smoother" if she signed it.

"He kept rushing me, like, 'Go ahead, things will be better if you did,'" Brooks said. "It was like, there's gonna be some big time stuff that happens to me if I don't sign it."

Bradenton resident Travis M. Hickman was arrested this month in a drug investigation and taken to police headquarters, but he was released without being charged with a crime.

Police said they saw Hickman throw two pieces of crack cocaine from a car window one evening in the 2600 block of 9th Street West.

Hickman, 21, who has a record of drug-related crimes, was searched for drugs. An officer dug into a pocket and pulled out cash.

"This is drug money. This is drug money," Hickman recalled an officer tell him, holding his cash.

"They went all up in my pockets. I didn't have no dope on me that day."

An officer put the "white, small objects that appeared to be crack cocaine" into a bag and placed it into the property department, according to police reports.

"They are arresting me but trying to tell me I know somebody. They wanted me to set someone up," said Hickman, who denied throwing anything out of the car window. "They said they would issue a warrant for my arrest."

Police took $30 from Hickman, according to the Contraband Forfeiture Agreement he signed.

Hickman is adamant that police took more money -- two $50s that were not reported in the agreement.

Hickman also insists the only document he signed is a sheet on which Miranda Rights were printed.

10-22-2006, 02:42 PM
Good to see someone is finally going after the good ole boy net work!

10-22-2006, 03:29 PM
Really--this the new trend across the country.

Certainly they should take every thing they can from drug dealers!

Besides if it is my property- I decide who I can give it to even ifs its the police.

Bottom line the police are not going to try to get your property if you are are not involved in crime.

Me giving my property is not the same as it be forfeited. Both have a process and are different. One is me giving and the other is the government taking. Two different things.

I make the decision to sign and initial in 10 places.

Botton line--take it all from those drug people.

10-22-2006, 03:40 PM
If you read the contraband forfeiture document the city IS taking under the premise of the Florida Forfeiture Contraband Act. So the money's considered forfeiture revenue, under that act, even if the person did sign it over.

10-22-2006, 03:46 PM
As I read this story this is not the Florida Forfeiture Act. This is a separate civil contract between the consenting parties and quite legal.

So Im am sure they still seize items through the florida Forfeiture Act, I support these civil contracts. Keeps the lawyers out and keeps the money in house to continue to fight illegal narcotics.

If you are looking for support to do away with the program you will not get it from the public. I can read between the lines especially in this case. The guy throws some rock cocaine out the window and has $10,000 in cash in his pocket. 19 year old kids don't have that kind of cash in their pocket unless they are involved in drugs.

I support the effort to take the profit out of narcotics. That the only way to do it. Civil Contracts like this are legal and binding.

10-22-2006, 10:03 PM
I can't wait for the day when we see Henry Lee out at 7th and 12th West hanging out with all his buds.

10-22-2006, 10:50 PM
Lets look at the real victim's here; the dopers. Those poor people work hard for that money, and the nerve of us police to SWOOP in and seize it. How dare we put a stop to the drug sales in our city? We have some nerve to disrupt the sales of narcotics!!! I think when we see a doper selling some of his fine product we need to be more community friendly and go give him some of our cash, and some of the city's cash. BUt you know, they would still have somehting to complain about in the papers. I really like this quote:

"They went all up in my pockets. I didn't have no dope on me that day."

That shows the level of education, and note; he did not have NO dope on him THAT DAY. What a loser

10-22-2006, 11:56 PM
Guest94, could you please advise where that article came from. If it was a local reporter I want to call them and ask why they did not report all of the facts in Travis Hickmans case(go figure) :snicker:

10-23-2006, 02:46 AM
It is illegal to carry more than 10,000 in cash without completing a CTR or currency transaction report. Try reading F.S.S. 896 or take a money laundering class. Whoever wrote that article and the State Attorney who dropped the charges is a dumb-dumb. The charge was a good charge and is a third degree felony. The statute outlines money laundering and should be read by all.

10-23-2006, 10:47 AM
Whoever wrote that article and the State Attorney who dropped the charges is a dumb-dumb.

Our SAO dropped charges......I cant believe that.....
The SAO ....., dropping charges on Burglaries , Rapes, and even murders (all with confessions), I just dont see it. :roll:

10-23-2006, 08:52 PM
article was online from sarasota herald trib with a nice picture of the chief next to it the other day

03-16-2008, 11:57 PM
are you talking from the side of the law? law officer? great of ALL people you know the law best! RIGHT??? well from what THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS when a law officer acts upon personal feelings instead of THE LAW (WHICH NEVER HAPPENS. RIGHT OFFICER?) (NO DISRESPECT TO) THE HONEST OFFICERS) a judge will sentence a DIS-HONEST OFFICER three times as harsh as a drug dealer. so keep it up BIG TIME LOSERS (AGAIN NO DIS-RESPSCT to THE HONEST OFFICERS) they WILL beat YOUR ass when you get to PRISON

03-17-2008, 04:42 AM
How about if us police officers just sit back and do nothing more in reference to the war against drugs. Let's just let these drug dealers do their business, make their "hard earned" money, contaminate our city with their dope, drive with suspended/revoked driver's licenses, etc. Then we can put the defense attorney's out of business because they won't have anyone to represent...This is so disappointing to me as an honest officer doing my job day in and day out that the criminals have so many rights to protect them and their criminal behaviors. Not that I am for a tyrrant type of police department, but damn, officers take drug money away from drug dealers and the community gets mad...That Jicela Banales has been involved in the cocaine business with her family for over ten years now. She set up a person that stole some cocaine from her and her brother (Osvaldo) and cousin ambushed him and stabbed him nearly to death...all of them were not charged because the person they attacked had a gun and shot back in self-defense AFTER he was stabbed multiple times...but the state dropped the charges on the attackers because they said that they were just protecting themselves. Then her little brother (Pito) murdered a rival gang member (The Boogeyman) at the Chevron gas station on 1st Street shortly after that attack...This is a *%#!@ joke...

Let's just let them kill each other off in their war for drug and gang turf. Let's stay out of the drug holes and start patrolling the areas of the law abiding citizens of our city that actually pay our salaries because they're home owners and pay taxes for our salaries, unlike the government supported dopers. They are the ones that deserve to be protected from the scum of our city. If someone was to analyse how much manpower is allocated to patrolling the drug infested areas of our city, I'm sure the tax payers would not be happy. How much time is actually spent patrolling areas like Braden River Lakes, Hawk Island, River Isles, Village Green, Southern Parkway, Sandpointe, Riverview Blvd, Pinebrook & Ironwood, Lakeside South, Palma Sola Causeway, Cordova Lakes, or Perico Island? I can assure you that it is not nearly as much as the areas of 14th Street West east to 27th Street East, which is the predominantly drug infested area of Bradenton. Let's sit back and do nothing and see what happens to crime in Bradenton. The drop that we've had over the past five years or so would be lost. The dopers will drive that crime rate right back to what it was back 6 to 10 years ago.

Then there will be another outcry on how bad crime has gotten and the demand to put these drug dealers out of business will rise...then the cycle starts all over again when we are allowed to do our jobs again...then the complaining will begin again that started this whole conversation to begin with...so on and so on...it's a no win situation...