PDA

View Full Version : Specialists supervising IRS?



03-02-2013, 02:16 AM
Should Specialists, aka HRS (High Risk Supervision) have a third of their caseload in IRS? We have one in my office that has this.

03-02-2013, 03:15 AM
Should Specialists, aka HRS (High Risk Supervision) have a third of their caseload in IRS? We have one in my office that has this.

Why would a specilasit have any minimum cases at all? Shouldn't those cases be assigned to a CPO I?

03-02-2013, 03:41 AM
They should if the ones are overloaded.

03-02-2013, 01:21 PM
Should Specialists, aka HRS (High Risk Supervision) have a third of their caseload in IRS? We have one in my office that has this.

would love to hear more. what kind do they have in IRS.

03-02-2013, 11:30 PM
Should Specialists, aka HRS (High Risk Supervision) have a third of their caseload in IRS? We have one in my office that has this.

would love to hear more. what kind do they have in IRS.

Ones that used to be Minimum -guess they were high risk minimum risk

03-02-2013, 11:32 PM
They should if the ones are overloaded.

SO if the ones are overloaded with max, the minimum and IRS should go to a High Risk Officer? Sounds like the Ole DC Okey Doke

03-03-2013, 06:23 PM
The problem is not what other cases the specialists are getting on top of supervising sex offenders and release cases, the issue is that DC is slamming them with far more than 40 cases which leaves little time to watch their offenders. But then again we already know they are reducing and minimizing intensive supervision as evidenced by haulting computer searches. Go ahead and pile the cases on.....more reason to privatize. How can anyone blame the Pasco sheriff for taking over the supervision of probation cases in his county?

How many minutes are the specialists actually spending on quality supervision or face to face time with their cases per month? This is purposeful, IMO. They are watering down intensive supervision until it makes better sense to outsource. As a specialist I spend more time in the office updating screens and responding to emails than I do supervising high rish cases. What a gross waste of taxpayer's money.

03-03-2013, 07:18 PM
The specialists in my office have the easiest caseload of anyone. They have plenty of free time on their hands, doing very little.

03-16-2013, 02:20 AM
The specialists in my office have the easiest caseload of anyone. They have plenty of free time on their hands, doing very little.

You know what is it about this department where you get promoted, get more money and do less work than the 1's? The 1's are in the 30% range on actives, 100+ and the 3's are in the 20% and constantly whine about having regular cases. Come on people, you have a job, just do it. Gees. Or hey, here's an idea, cut the 3's and give us two 1's.

03-16-2013, 04:45 PM
How about just getting rid of all CA's, ROM's, COM's, and RD's? All they do it drawa huge paycheck and sit on their fat asses :!:

03-16-2013, 04:57 PM
how many max cases do you have as a 1. We oldies had 150 cases as ones , there was no specialist of dopos, we worked the trenches , we faught for your special risk, for your right to carry and for your right to think your overworked. Do you job or get out, I am so tired of the generation me who thinks entitlement is theres, ewww so glad it over soon for me .Privatize the place causes your newbies are worthless.





The specialists in my office have the easiest caseload of anyone. They have plenty of free time on their hands, doing very little.

You know what is it about this department where you get promoted, get more money and do less work than the 1's? The 1's are in the 30% range on actives, 100+ and the 3's are in the 20% and constantly whine about having regular cases. Come on people, you have a job, just do it. Gees. Or hey, here's an idea, cut the 3's and give us two 1's.