10-18-2012, 03:38 AM
This was originally posted here. http://nakedconch.blogspot.com/2012/09/ ... 6078469200 (http://nakedconch.blogspot.com/2012/09/naked-conch-truth-in-campaigning-award.html?showComment=1350531105099#c529664593607 8469200)
Why hasn't the papers picked up on this? I am guessing this info was obtained by public records requests for Ramsay's personnel and disciplinary file. So it is available to anyone who asks. Has any of the newspapers asked for either candidates records.
I mean some of this shocks my conscience. I am already a Peteck supporter, but even if I was not this would certainly change my mind.
originally posted 10-16
This is a reply to the post about the "republican losers". Im shocked that a Ramsay supporter would personally attack the republican primary candidates. I quess the threats from Ramsay himself during the campaign directly to those candidates should have been my first clue. Silly me I heard over and over the Ramsay camp were the only ones taking the high road. The personal attacks contained about about the other candidates are untrue. However Rick Ramsay himself threatened to release this un true information. Still the other candidates never mentioned Ramsay dating the wife of a current sergeant, and the fact he began dating her while still married to that sergeant. Never mentioned MCSO paid to settle a lawsuit in 1994 to Mr. Guiterriez in Federal court because of Ramsay's inproper behavior during an encounter acting as a deputy sheriff. Never mentioned Ramsay was the roomate of a deputy sheriff who was accused of molesting boys in the explorer program in the home the two shared. Never brought up that Ramsay was dating the flight medic who was accused of stealing equipment off Trama Star and covered up the investigation. Never mentioned Col. Ramsay had sexual relations with a deputy sheriff who was then given training opportunities that more senior deputies were denied. Never mentioned Ramsay was denied employment at the Sheriffs Office in 1984 because of his drug use. All of these things can be confirmed by public records and sworn statements. The information the person claimed about the two "republican losers" can be proven false by the same public records. This information is all out there and anyone who is interested can verify it.
Why hasn't the papers picked up on this? I am guessing this info was obtained by public records requests for Ramsay's personnel and disciplinary file. So it is available to anyone who asks. Has any of the newspapers asked for either candidates records.
I mean some of this shocks my conscience. I am already a Peteck supporter, but even if I was not this would certainly change my mind.
originally posted 10-16
This is a reply to the post about the "republican losers". Im shocked that a Ramsay supporter would personally attack the republican primary candidates. I quess the threats from Ramsay himself during the campaign directly to those candidates should have been my first clue. Silly me I heard over and over the Ramsay camp were the only ones taking the high road. The personal attacks contained about about the other candidates are untrue. However Rick Ramsay himself threatened to release this un true information. Still the other candidates never mentioned Ramsay dating the wife of a current sergeant, and the fact he began dating her while still married to that sergeant. Never mentioned MCSO paid to settle a lawsuit in 1994 to Mr. Guiterriez in Federal court because of Ramsay's inproper behavior during an encounter acting as a deputy sheriff. Never mentioned Ramsay was the roomate of a deputy sheriff who was accused of molesting boys in the explorer program in the home the two shared. Never brought up that Ramsay was dating the flight medic who was accused of stealing equipment off Trama Star and covered up the investigation. Never mentioned Col. Ramsay had sexual relations with a deputy sheriff who was then given training opportunities that more senior deputies were denied. Never mentioned Ramsay was denied employment at the Sheriffs Office in 1984 because of his drug use. All of these things can be confirmed by public records and sworn statements. The information the person claimed about the two "republican losers" can be proven false by the same public records. This information is all out there and anyone who is interested can verify it.