08-06-2008, 02:32 PM
Can Tallahassee not make a decision anymore? Heres an example of their track record in decision making 101. Filling the Gulf County Lt. position.
Candidates: 2
Thats right only 2 candidates to pick from.
Ranking of candidates: Candidate A, Ranked NUMBER ONE on LT. LIST
Candidate B, 49th on list ( thats out of about 60 or so )
Background: A:Investigator, has worked both Woods, Fresh and saltwater
B: Works only saltwater, every now and then will call in on the river to make it appear he works freshwater. Will not even do that for hunting issues
Decision making record: A, has proven himself many times with being able to make decisions
B, Has proven himself uncountable times that he WILL NOT make a decision. Has a region wide reputation of asking for direction on every issue. Stays on the phone hours and hours simply asking what to do and how to do it. Has to ask SEVERAL people the same question before taking action.
Reputation among officers: A, Thought of with high regard, Honest, dependable
B, Thought of as an instagator, Gossiper, not trustworthy, cant keep information to himself. Talks behind officers backs. Disliked by the community. History of several I.A.'s.
So now you see the facts of the matter. Would this really need to go for another round of interviews? Looks like something else is going on here.
Candidates: 2
Thats right only 2 candidates to pick from.
Ranking of candidates: Candidate A, Ranked NUMBER ONE on LT. LIST
Candidate B, 49th on list ( thats out of about 60 or so )
Background: A:Investigator, has worked both Woods, Fresh and saltwater
B: Works only saltwater, every now and then will call in on the river to make it appear he works freshwater. Will not even do that for hunting issues
Decision making record: A, has proven himself many times with being able to make decisions
B, Has proven himself uncountable times that he WILL NOT make a decision. Has a region wide reputation of asking for direction on every issue. Stays on the phone hours and hours simply asking what to do and how to do it. Has to ask SEVERAL people the same question before taking action.
Reputation among officers: A, Thought of with high regard, Honest, dependable
B, Thought of as an instagator, Gossiper, not trustworthy, cant keep information to himself. Talks behind officers backs. Disliked by the community. History of several I.A.'s.
So now you see the facts of the matter. Would this really need to go for another round of interviews? Looks like something else is going on here.