The truth about Mark D Barker

[Unregistered]

Processes take time. Have faith in the ole mole or mongoose. As far as him producing embarrassment, you're right he hasn't because the agency produces enough on its own! He just releases inside information and memos not meant for the general public. I follow the forums and I never recall him claiming he was responsible for any disciplinary outcomes. You do realize that discredits your claims, wouldn't you agree. He is making a mockery of a once elite agency whether you admit it or not.
And to address the prior commenter~what evidence beyond a rogue judge's unconstitutional civil (not criminal) ruling or an early 2000's DV arrest do you have. That is a 17 year old misdemeanor for Christ's sake! Just a bunch of vague claims if you ask me. And citing traffic infractions just shows your desperation. I really doubt an active criminal would mock any Sheriff in his own house and county. If he was a criminal, what does that say about the SO. Why dont you publically address these issues with him rather than here? Are you worried he may embarrass you? He votes and is registered and therefore isn't a felon. You have an SRD that "grooms" children at school and asks them to tell stories, and yet Alvin is a criminal. You will lose the battle in the publics eyes but I would love to see that debate.

“Process takes time.” Now you’re admitting you haven’t fulfilled what you were trying to argue previously. You said you delivered, which is it now? We know the answer and the “process” comment is why people don’t believe you. Take all the time you need. You don’t need anyone’s permission. However, until you deliver, you’re nothing but a liar! We all know by next year, it will still be the same.

“Rouge judge.” You have no evidence but beliefs and criminal convictions. You’re beliefs is what has gotten in trouble. You would have appealed the judges ruling if that was accurate. Again, all talk and no punches! It’s funny, you went to great lengths defended such a horrible ruling from a judge letting a convicted sex offender out. You told us we need to respect the rule of law. You counter acted anyone who disagreed. You were expressively clear we needed to respect the judges decision. Now, because you don’t like the ruling of your judge, he’s a rouge judge. That’s hypocritical and rich isn’t it? The evidence clearly demonstrates you are defined by the courts as a sexual stalker. I wake up each and every day knowing your gullible and guilty.

You have been on here several times stating you have a DV against you. Your words and records don’t lie slime ball! CRIMINAL traffic violations (not just traffic) show a pattern of clear disregard to the law. It just adds up to your arrest and criminal convictions (DV and stalking). You argued you’re not a criminal and the traffic violations were brought because it relates to the other problems.

I don’t address these issues with you publicly with you because of your behavior online. You’re always right and you constantly visit and inbox pages. You can’t have a debate without harassing and stalking people. I can do that here easily and you can’t stalk me like a pervert. I also hold public office and I want to voice without retribution to me. I’m glad you approve Chipmunk!

[Unregistered]

“Process takes time.” Now you’re admitting you haven’t fulfilled what you were trying to argue previously. You said you delivered, which is it now? We know the answer and the “process” comment is why people don’t believe you. Take all the time you need. You don’t need anyone’s permission. However, until you deliver, you’re nothing but a liar! We all know by next year, it will still be the same.

“Rouge judge.” You have no evidence but beliefs and criminal convictions. You’re beliefs is what has gotten in trouble. You would have appealed the judges ruling if that was accurate. Again, all talk and no punches! It’s funny, you went to great lengths defended such a horrible ruling from a judge letting a convicted sex offender out. You told us we need to respect the rule of law. You counter acted anyone who disagreed. You were expressively clear we needed to respect the judges decision. Now, because you don’t like the ruling of your judge, he’s a rouge judge. That’s hypocritical and rich isn’t it? The evidence clearly demonstrates you are defined by the courts as a sexual stalker. I wake up each and every day knowing your gullible and guilty.

You have been on here several times stating you have a DV against you. Your words and records don’t lie slime ball! CRIMINAL traffic violations (not just traffic) show a pattern of clear disregard to the law. It just adds up to your arrest and criminal convictions (DV and stalking). You argued you’re not a criminal and the traffic violations were brought because it relates to the other problems.

I don’t address these issues with you publicly with you because of your behavior online. You’re always right and you constantly visit and inbox pages. You can’t have a debate without harassing and stalking people. I can do that here easily and you can’t stalk me like a pervert. I also hold public office and I want to voice without retribution to me. I’m glad you approve Chipmunk!

And now you stalk alvin here...loser

[Unregistered]

And now you stalk alvin here...loser

How can you stalk anonymous accounts?

[Unregistered]

How can you stalk anonymous accounts?

What? Wow. Volusia's finest! That's like saying how is it murder if you don't know the name of the person you shot.

[Unregistered]

How can you stalk anonymous accounts?

Alvin is the only poster who signs his names or leaves his smiley face so it is not really anonymous.

[Unregistered]

Alvin is the only poster who signs his names or leaves his smiley face so it is not really anonymous.

Thanks for clearing that up. I guess that person can’t be stalking Alvin. He or she has been responding to someone not using smiley faces. We know Alvin is an honest criminal and would never post anything without a smiley face.

[Unregistered]

Thanks for clearing that up. I guess that person can’t be stalking Alvin. He or she has been responding to someone not using smiley faces. We know Alvin is an honest criminal and would never post anything without a smiley face.

Alvin is using the same practices as you few do now. No more smiley faces with sun glasses. And to the comment above about stalking me, I completely agree. I just wont waste my time filing a complaint because the Sheriff is a joke. Processes do take time and begun is halfway done. Everything takes 6 months in your arena. You should have never named me and released the hounds on this anonymous forum designed for your inner issues.

[Unregistered]

“Process takes time.” Now you’re admitting you haven’t fulfilled what you were trying to argue previously. You said you delivered, which is it now? We know the answer and the “process” comment is why people don’t believe you. Take all the time you need. You don’t need anyone’s permission. However, until you deliver, you’re nothing but a liar! We all know by next year, it will still be the same.

“Rouge judge.” You have no evidence but beliefs and criminal convictions. You’re beliefs is what has gotten in trouble. You would have appealed the judges ruling if that was accurate. Again, all talk and no punches! It’s funny, you went to great lengths defended such a horrible ruling from a judge letting a convicted sex offender out. You told us we need to respect the rule of law. You counter acted anyone who disagreed. You were expressively clear we needed to respect the judges decision. Now, because you don’t like the ruling of your judge, he’s a rouge judge. That’s hypocritical and rich isn’t it? The evidence clearly demonstrates you are defined by the courts as a sexual stalker. I wake up each and every day knowing your gullible and guilty.

You have been on here several times stating you have a DV against you. Your words and records don’t lie slime ball! CRIMINAL traffic violations (not just traffic) show a pattern of clear disregard to the law. It just adds up to your arrest and criminal convictions (DV and stalking). You argued you’re not a criminal and the traffic violations were brought because it relates to the other problems.

I don’t address these issues with you publicly with you because of your behavior online. You’re always right and you constantly visit and inbox pages. You can’t have a debate without harassing and stalking people. I can do that here easily and you can’t stalk me like a pervert. I also hold public office and I want to voice without retribution to me. I’m glad you approve Chipmunk!

She is a rogue judge BTW. And I do not have any criminal citations PERIOD! A seatbelt ticket or 2 maybe but no criminal arrests or citations, so again where do you get your information because my source(s) are apparently more accurate. And as far as private messages go, it is social media and designed this way. When I message someone if they do not respond then neither do I. I suggest you petition all of these people I harrass and have them file complaints. See where that gets you. Sorry to break the news but the stalking wasn't criminal and civil law is much different and the requirements are much less. I have never disregarded or disrespected any members of law enforcement with all of my contact with them that began in the late 90's. I just keep good records. There are 400 of you employed and if you can find one person to say otherwise I will leave leo affairs even though invited by name and enticed by lies. When I say one person, I mean one identified person who i have had contact with, not a spat on leo affairs about Newman, Luoma, Turney, Hughes, ****, and ect... Name yourself and let's air it out. You are obviously out of the loop by assuming my (civil) judge was a Male. Get your information squared away before you throw mud and discredit yourself. This is my job and where I live is irrelevant. To talk about my family only fuels my fire. Those listed above have records of founded violations from dishonesty or purgery all the way to cheating online at the counties expense with county employees... and that is criminal even though you may deny. Just because you got out by an SI or slap on the wrist IA doesn't change the facts.

I welcome a public debate and I will face anyone, even if you need a 3rd party to represent you and keep your identity a secret. Bring it on and I'll take on the best you have face to face like adults do. If you're scared, say you're scared... I'll do this in your arena and by your rules. Surely if you hold public office and we debated in an open and public arena you could show that I harrass and stalk. So if you have an ounce of ability, take the offer unknown public office person and let's do this. Other than that get lost and get a life because you're irrelevant to me.

[Unregistered]

How can you stalk anonymous accounts?

Yes, accounts are anonymous until the threshold gets crossed. But many direct comments to "Alvin" so I have to agree that many comments are teetering on criminal harrassment. Alvin's responding to an unknown protects him whether you agree or not. Keep in mind that he gets named and when this is investigated (probably is) he will likely be the victor and could potentially deliver on many promises of embarrassment. I would be amazed if FDLE isn't already monitoring who is who. Alvin has a defense, do you?
JS (just sayin') not Justin Jason or John.

[Unregistered]

I guess the trolls didn't consider the Terms of Use on this site...Oops..

"Prohibited Conduct:*Registered Users, Advertisers, and all those who use of, make purchases at, and/or visit this site agree that they will NOT personally or in any manner effect or invoke any other party to:
Harass, demean, stalk, threaten, defraud others at this site.
Post, send, provide, request, distribute, link, or in any way make available any unlawful, threatening, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent, including any communication that constitutes (or encourages conduct that would constitute) a criminal offense, gives rise to civil liability, or otherwise violates any local, state, national, or international law; Post, send, provide, request, distribute, link, or in any way make available any inappropriate or offensive content or materials including, but not limited to: pornographic or sexually explicit, threatening, hostile, violent, embarrassing, harmful, hateful, racially insulting, ethnically insulting, deceptive, defamatory, tortious, libelous, or otherwise inappropriate or offensive content or material Post, send, provide, distribute, request, link, make, discuss, depict, or in any way make available any form of child, or any other, person or creature, abuse, cruelty, sexuality, exploitation, or any other related materials or topics posing harm to, or threatening the security of a child or an individual."