Results 11 to 20 of 26
-
12-12-2008, 08:43 AM #11
Re: Sidearms
How would you cross train so that in the case of an all out shoot out your partner was put out of commission, still had ammo left but you don’t? That’s the reason for uniformity and not a hodge-podge of weapons and ammo being used
-
12-12-2008, 07:52 PM #12
Re: Sidearms
The professionals understand the need for a standardized type of gun regardless of which model or make the department chooses to have.
The cowboys want to carry their own toys, (look at my super duper gun, it is bigger and more expensive than yours) that’s the BS you would hear all day long.
-
12-12-2008, 10:23 PM #13
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 189
Re: Sidearms
If any of you can show me more than 1 or 2 times in teh past, say 10 years, when there was a shoot out that required officers to share ammo, I will give in on this point.
It is so rare, I would rather officers carry guns tehy are most comfortable with. That is more important that planning for the doomsday scenario. If you need more than 37 shots, we are in an all out war.
-
12-12-2008, 11:05 PM #14
Re: Sidearms
Originally Posted by Deputy Dooley
All it takes is a magazine malfunction, bad batch of ammo, poor maintenance, and I could go on and on. It doesn't take a massive shootout for an Officer to need a magazine from another Officer. I don't want to be the Officer on the receiving end during one of those "one of a million chances situations" and not be able to get ammo from another Officer when I need it.
-
12-13-2008, 02:43 AM #15
Re: Sidearms
Originally Posted by Deputy Dooley
You forget what is going on around the world and the all the experts are predicting it’s just a matter of time when not if it is going to happen here. We are over due for an all out assault on our very way of life my millions of radical nuts who are being trained as we write and read these words to wipe you and all like you and me off the face of the earth.
We’ve already had a number of Doomsday Scenarios with 9/11/04 being just one of them and we need to be prepared for the next one and hopefully not with clowns like you making the decisions.
-
12-13-2008, 02:58 AM #16
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 189
Re: Sidearms
And you think I am the dumbarse? 9/11 happened in 2001, not 2004 retard. I know you were still in high school back then, and its hard to remember anything through the pot smoke, but try to keep it together.
Sure, we can all name 1 or 2 times where there was some massive shootout. But how often is an officer involved in a 1 on 1 shootout, in which their familiarity, comfortabilty and accuracy of their duty weapon will make the life or death difference in who walks away. The answer is... almost every week we hear of that.
If an officer is more comfortable or accurate with a different type of weapon, we should encourage them to be able to use it.
Id rather have an officer that can fire a few well-placed shots and get the job done, over an officer who has to shoot so much (or maintains his weapon so poorly) that they have to BORROW ammo from another officer (if there is even another officer on scene).
-
12-13-2008, 04:31 AM #17
Re: Sidearms
Originally Posted by Deputy Dooley
-
12-13-2008, 04:40 AM #18
Re: Sidearms
As I recall, the shootouts on Warrington Rd and the one in Century required the transfers of ammo (slid&thrown) to officers....the argument of uniformity has merit, in may not encourage or allow individualism but when the defecation hits the ventilation it is nice that we are all on the same page (One officer charged/approached the Warrington Rd shooter with empty weapon...adrenaline)....no argument from me on 45 vs 40 for stop and knock down but that is another story. All ,stay safe and happy holidays!!!
-
12-13-2008, 05:00 AM #19
Re: Sidearms
Originally Posted by Deputy Dooley
Shooting at a paper target and being an expert shot is a whole lot different then when that target is shooting back and he has more fire power than you. Even the expert marksman on the range may have a problem making those well placed shots when he is hiding behind his car with no chance to look over the hood and actually aim and shoot. When you haven't walked in my shoes don't second guess my actions. Anyone can be a Monday morning quarter back. Can you be sure you will be able to walk the walk when it comes down to it.
I can answer that question because I've been there.
-
12-13-2008, 05:49 AM #20
Re: Sidearms
Originally Posted by Retired Copper!!!!
Please post any documented cases where magazines where successfully transferred, under fire, from officer to officer. (The Hollywood shootout was mainly AR15 mags, not pistol.)
ps..no offence but my 37 rounds will be used to save myself and you aren't getting them if I'm currently being shot at. Take what you want if I'm down.
Bookmarks