Pre-Primary Poll Results - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
 
  1. #21
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    Congrats to Bob White and Kim Bogart. Nov will be exciting. Great to see a female on the ticket, way to go KIM! You are an inspiration to all female cops!!

    Trinity Resident

  2. #22
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    LOL, funny post. Kim Bogart is a Male.
    White Sullivan is MUCH closer then I thought. Maybe a wake up call.

  3. #23
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    The results are in.

    As I said a long time ago, the guy with the most cash, WINS.

    Hang in there guys, it's almost over. In four years it starts all
    over again.

    Keep up the good work.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Pasco County, Florida
    Posts
    102

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    Just keep your browser on Bay News 9 for up to date poll results...

  5. #25
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    Quote Originally Posted by fldeputy
    Just keep your browser on Bay News 9 for up to date poll results...
    I did, they called it, good job Bob.

    By the way, I was not avoiding anyone, but I was at Sheriff White's Victory Party. Guest, you make some good points and I agree that the county should make the GAP for 25 years. I spoke to a county commissioner today at the polls, and he too understood your logic. I think next year they will consider the change if you can hammer out the details with them. Good luck, you deserve it. I hope that some of the fighting among you now stops since two candidates are out of the race as if you can't unify the Sheriff, the union, and the Commission, you will not get what you want.

  6. #26
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    I think if the sheriff were to re-evaluate his position on the no-monetary-cost contract the unions submitted, and just agree to the minor submissions that again, do not cost anyone a dime, he would have the olive branch returned with more bluster than he extended it with. At that point, the union could do a lot of good in getting the backing he needs each budget time. A house divided will fall, but one united will stand.

    The sheriff knows this, but refuses to be a grown up and had his butt chapped when we voted to go union. He told 3 people he thought and might still think were his buddys that he wasn't giving the deputies a damn think and he would teach us a lesson for voting to unionize. I believe the 3 people who told me because they are 3 that were always seen with the sheriff and the 3 do not hang out together as they are in different types of businesses. They are all prominent people in their various and different communities and they have never been caught in a lie as far as I am aware of.

  7. #27
    Guest

    Re: Pre-Primary Poll Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Guest
    John Sanders, you actually listened to the sheriff at the meetings and your statement of "cause" proves it. I applaud your attention span because normally he puts people to sleep with the overuse of his clichés. "Cause" can mean anything. "Just cause" is what the deputies unions wanted to be placed in the discipline policy. If his purpose for demotion, or discipline is sound, he shouldn't be worried about changing the term "for cause" to "for just cause." On the other hand, if he wants the ability to fire someone for political reasons, he would fear the term "for just cause." We only want everyone on a level playing field. Person A should be treated the same as person B if each committed the same violation. As it sets now, if person A is a supporter, nothing happens while person B gets disciplined.

    The union also wanted GAP, but when the budget crisis started to rear it's head, the union pulled the proposal from their contract and changed the whole GAP issue to be a request from the sheriff on behalf of the deputies. In other words, we asked the sheriff to agree to ask the county to fund GAP for us like they do for the rest of the county. Thats right, the guy who cleans the floors and windows on county buildings gets GAP. Now if you don't like law enforcement officers, tell the county that your feel we do not deserve it.

    Those are the two negotiation reasons why we reached an impasse. We already stated we could live without use of the mailboxes for union communications and he is aware of that even though numerous other agencies have that ability. In your opinion, should the deputies stand up for what we think is right? Or are we asking for too much? We want the word of the sheriff to be solid, believe me. More importantly, we want our policies to be the solid foundation of what guides us as they should. The sheriff has taken benefits away arbitrarily and changed policy that he didn't even follow to new policies he still doesn't follow and that is wrong.

    Now to answer your questions.
    How many people has Sheriff White demoted without cause?
    There have been about 5 people disciplined for cause where there was no good reason. He effectively fired a deputy and violated his law enforcement bill of rights only to bring the deputy back because there is nothing to support the improper termination. http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/may...t-with-deputy/ The deputy has had to file 2 lawsuits to preserve his rights because the only relief is in the courts. We just had 2 detectives reassigned to patrol positions for no reason other than "you are no longer who we desire in this position." Those reassignments come with a 5% pay cut. Add that to the wage freeze and that is huge for people raising children when they did nothing wrong and are not under investigation.

    Has he ever went against the recommendation of the Appeals Board?
    He has lost every ruling when the appeals board has convened and he clearly should have lost them. His influence with the times has greatly aided him in burying the rulings in the back pages and then accepting the fact that "the sheriff was not available for comment" for the remainder of time. He accepted the rulings because they would have clearly led to huge federal lawsuits over the ineffective investigations leading to the terminations and that would have been covered in a different section of the times that his friends in our local bureau can not control.

    Didn't the Sheriff ask for your GAP insurance, even in these tight budgetary times because he knows what it means for you guys?
    During negotiations, the sheriff refused to agree to ask the county commission to fund the GAP insurance which is all the union asked him to do. Then when the public became educated that EVERY other full time county employee gets that benefit, he realized he would look silly if he did not ask for it. It would have been transparent that he was continuing his pattern of violating federal law by employing union busting. We have had deputies attend mandatory meet the sheriff sessions over the last few months report back that the sheriff spent the majority of the time trying to pit them against the unions and gain their vote in his reelection. Several new deputies felt uncomfortable to be in the meetings and he was reported as telling them the county agreed to give him 2.5% for raises in this upcoming budget, but he declined it because the union demanded 5% raises. I assure you that this is a complete lie because the union and sheriff have not had negotiations at all concerning this upcoming budget. He has lied to these employees to serve himself. No wonder why you had a bad experience with a deputy. I would leave a meeting feeling pretty low if I didn't know better too. By the way, the FOP does not condone a deputy doing a crappy job because he represents all deputies out there and we are prideful in the work we do. If we weren't we wouldn't ask for better treatment and better conditions.

    As a side note. Even though he asked for the county to fund GAP, he can take the money and tell the deputies to suck it and he can use the money for whatever he wants. We want it in a contract so he can not do that because yes, he can not be trusted to do the right thing.

    What you should be concerned about is the fact that the county has GAP set so only the workers who stay 30 years will be eligible. It should be commensurate with your retirement class. Fire fighters and deputies normal retirement in the Florida retirement system is 25 years. If I as a county commissioner have them work an extra 5 years, I will spend more money to pay an employee a higher wage through years 25-30 than I would if I made GAP available at 25 years and they retired and a new 1st year employee filled their position. The cost for GAP per 25 year retiree each year would be less than the difference of a higher wage 30 year employee minus the lower wage of a new employee. You should really be asking the county and the sheriff about that waste!

    Pasco Deputy Sheriff Wages
    Starting pay= $17.82 per hour or $3,029.40 per month
    30 year pay = approx $32.98 per hour or $5,606.60 per month
    Difference in pay = approx 15.16 per hour or $2,577.20 per month GAP IS WAY CHEAPER! GIVE THEM GAP AS INCENTIVE TO RETIRE AT 25 YEARS AND SAVE BIG $$$ I'm sure the Pasco Fire Fighter wages will be similar in differences and still can not believe the county didn't think to look at this closer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Mr. Sanders, I am neither disgruntled, nor a call sluffer. I think it sucks if your call for service was not handled within guidelines and according to the law as long as we had the legal authority to perform whatever service you asked of us. I am simply a member of the FOP and a member of one of the labor units and have given you honest answers to your questions based on information available to me. Wouldn't you kind of have to agree with me that all our elected officials have their heads up their behinds and have not been honest with us and lived up to their promises?

    I can honestly say that if things don't change no matter who the sheriff is white, sullivan, bogart, or mickey mouse, you and I will be worse off. It will only be a matter of time before some drug addict or gang member sees us, our loved ones and our houses as appetizing targets for crime.
    Really good points. i noticed Sanders didn't reply. The thing about bob and his white haired friends is that when they can not make up a good lie to cover the truth, or change the subject, they ignore the topic all together. It is the same criminal tactic a suspect uses when he hides in some bushes at the end of a chase. They think that if they don't look at you, you won't see them.
    I guess I am right.
    Intruder Killed Pasco Man, Tied Up Wife, Deputies Say

    How can you disagree. This was a quiet and retirement neighborhood. If we had the staffing we should have, this might have been prevented with proactive policing and a pro arrest approach. I hope we get someone who will allow us to be law enforcement officers and not report takers.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •