Results 11 to 20 of 175
-
05-29-2006, 03:59 PM #11
To all of you out there saying, "Do you want one living next to you?" Of course not, and I also don't want that little punk drug dealer who lives in my neighborhood living by me. And yes, he has been reported and arrested MANY times, but he keeps coming right back out to live with his mother. My point is, the known sex offenders are not the ONLY sex offenders out there... there are a whole bunch that are your family, friends and neighbors who haven't been caught yet. How do I know this you ask, well the new cases I get every week that are new sex offenders is my proof. I have a family member with 2 small children who does live several houses down from 2 sex offenders. Her children have been told that if either one even speaks to them, they are to run directly home...they even know what they look like. We as a family have to be careful of the sex offenders whose pictures aren't on the website yet. Just some food for thought.
-
05-29-2006, 06:04 PM #12
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 149
well the new cases I get every week that are new sex offenders is my proof
If the registered offenders were the ones who are a danger and are responsible for all the crimes, there wouldn't be all those new cases. Florida's sex offender registry grows by a range of 60-80 offenders per week.If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
Louis D. Brandeis
http://www.danasoft.com/sig/.jpg
-
05-29-2006, 11:13 PM #13Originally Posted by No1 important
-
05-29-2006, 11:39 PM #14
Sorry guest, when you were talking about sex offenders living on your block, I thought you were referring to public safety not the resale value of a home...my bad. :wink:
-
05-29-2006, 11:46 PM #15Originally Posted by No1 important
-
05-30-2006, 12:08 AM #16
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 110
Originally Posted by Anonymous
-
05-30-2006, 12:17 AM #17
Most of the sex offenders that I supervise molested someone in their family or their girlfriend's children. My second biggest group are teachers, usually pled down, of course. No one wants a sex offender living in their neighborhood, not even me (surprise). Having a 1000' or even a whole mile buffer zone, will not keep all the children safe from predators, if it did, it would have already worked and I wouldn't have any more cases. This would make me incredibly happy, because I don't like people who hurt children, but this is my job, so I do it to the best of my ability to protect your children and mine. I don't know of any neighborhoods who want or don't care that a sex offender is living there. They are a reality, like it or not, and I think a lot of specialist and CC officers are just trying to find the balance.
-
05-30-2006, 12:19 AM #18Originally Posted by Merlin
-
05-30-2006, 01:05 AM #19
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 110
The intent of the 1,000 foot rule was to prevent pedophiles from living across the street from a school, which in my opinion is a great idea. The unintended consequence of buffer zones lately is the use of buffer zones or local ordinances to ban all sex offenders from society. They have to live somewhere or go underground. How can this possibly have a positive impact on the reoffense rate?
-
05-30-2006, 01:15 AM #20Originally Posted by Merlin
Bookmarks