Turning over confidential information on LEOs earns Stahl high honors from SAO

[Unregistered]

Congratulations to Stahl for the rat of The year award

Seems this weekend the prosecutors association honored Steadman Stahl for his corporation on numerous cop investigations, some resulting in indictments of officers. KFR announced her pleasure that finally they have a PBA President who is willing to share information with the SAO that assists them in charging officers.

Great job to the supposed voice of law enforcement!!!

[Unregistered]

The bar should investigate if the lawyers are giving out attorney/client privileged information.

The PBA is about the worst I have ever seen it. Bad-bad-bad

[Unregistered]

Congratulations to Stahl for the rat of The year award

Seems this weekend the prosecutors association honored Steadman Stahl for his corporation on numerous cop investigations, some resulting in indictments of officers. KFR announced her pleasure that finally they have a PBA President who is willing to share information with the SAO that assists them in charging officers.

Great job to the supposed voice of law enforcement!!!

So what you're saying is that criminals should be protected as long as they wear a badge?

And you wonder why every day the public hate for the profession grows. SMH

[Unregistered]

So what you're saying is that criminals should be protected as long as they wear a badge?

And you wonder why every day the public hate for the profession grows. SMH

No but following the law it’s ilegal to violate client/attorney privilege information. Steadman gets the information from the lawyers who violate that oath.

[Unregistered]

No but following the law it’s ilegal to violate client/attorney privilege information. Steadman gets the information from the lawyers who violate that oath.

Got a statute to back up that what Steadman did was illegal?

Didn't think so.

Fake news. LOL

[Unregistered]

90.502 Lawyer-client privilege.—
(1) For purposes of this section:
(a) A “lawyer” is a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the client to be authorized, to practice law in any state or nation.
(b) A “client” is any person, public officer, corporation, association, or other organization or entity, either public or private, who consults a lawyer with the purpose of obtaining legal services or who is rendered legal services by a lawyer.
(c) A communication between lawyer and client is “confidential” if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than:
1. Those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client.
2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.
(2) A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such other person learned of the communications because they were made in the rendition of legal services to the client.
(3) The privilege may be claimed by:
(a) The client.
(b) A guardian or conservator of the client.
(c) The personal representative of a deceased client.
(d) A successor, assignee, trustee in dissolution, or any similar representative of an organization, corporation, or association or other entity, either public or private, whether or not in existence.
(e) The lawyer, but only on behalf of the client. The lawyer’s authority to claim the privilege is presumed in the absence of contrary evidence.
(4) There is no lawyer-client privilege under this section when:
(a) The services of the lawyer were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud.
(b) A communication is relevant to an issue between parties who claim through the same deceased client.
(c) A communication is relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer, arising from the lawyer-client relationship.
(d) A communication is relevant to an issue concerning the intention or competence of a client executing an attested document to which the lawyer is an attesting witness, or concerning the execution or attestation of the document.
(e) A communication is relevant to a matter of common interest between two or more clients, or their successors in interest, if the communication was made by any of them to a lawyer retained or consulted in common when offered in a civil action between the clients or their successors in interest.
(5) Communications made by a person who seeks or receives services from the Department of Revenue under the child support enforcement program to the attorney representing the department shall be confidential and privileged as provided for in this section. Such communications shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the agency except as provided for in this section. Such disclosures shall be protected as if there were an attorney-client relationship between the attorney for the agency and the person who seeks services from the department.
(6) A discussion or activity that is not a meeting for purposes of s. 286.011 shall not be construed to waive the attorney-client privilege established in this section. This shall not be construed to constitute an exemption to either s. 119.07 or s. 286.011.

[Unregistered]

😳 well someone needs to crawl back in their hole

[Unregistered]

90.502 Lawyer-client privilege.—
(1) For purposes of this section:
(a) A “lawyer” is a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the client to be authorized, to practice law in any state or nation.
(b) A “client” is any person, public officer, corporation, association, or other organization or entity, either public or private, who consults a lawyer with the purpose of obtaining legal services or who is rendered legal services by a lawyer.
(c) A communication between lawyer and client is “confidential” if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than:
1. Those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client.
2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.
(2) A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such other person learned of the communications because they were made in the rendition of legal services to the client.
(3) The privilege may be claimed by:
(a) The client.
(b) A guardian or conservator of the client.
(c) The personal representative of a deceased client.
(d) A successor, assignee, trustee in dissolution, or any similar representative of an organization, corporation, or association or other entity, either public or private, whether or not in existence.
(e) The lawyer, but only on behalf of the client. The lawyer’s authority to claim the privilege is presumed in the absence of contrary evidence.
(4) There is no lawyer-client privilege under this section when:
(a) The services of the lawyer were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud.
(b) A communication is relevant to an issue between parties who claim through the same deceased client.
(c) A communication is relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer, arising from the lawyer-client relationship.
(d) A communication is relevant to an issue concerning the intention or competence of a client executing an attested document to which the lawyer is an attesting witness, or concerning the execution or attestation of the document.
(e) A communication is relevant to a matter of common interest between two or more clients, or their successors in interest, if the communication was made by any of them to a lawyer retained or consulted in common when offered in a civil action between the clients or their successors in interest.
(5) Communications made by a person who seeks or receives services from the Department of Revenue under the child support enforcement program to the attorney representing the department shall be confidential and privileged as provided for in this section. Such communications shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the agency except as provided for in this section. Such disclosures shall be protected as if there were an attorney-client relationship between the attorney for the agency and the person who seeks services from the department.
(6) A discussion or activity that is not a meeting for purposes of s. 286.011 shall not be construed to waive the attorney-client privilege established in this section. This shall not be construed to constitute an exemption to either s. 119.07 or s. 286.011.

Chapter 90 is the evidence code you retard. Did you even read the title?

Got an actual criminal statute that shows it is illegal?

Don't worry we'll wait.

Also there are exceptions such as the crime-fraud exception under 90.502(4)(a), but we understand if your brain was hemorrhaging before reading that far.

What a fake news, loser, clown.

Now get back on that hamster wheel and run some more for us.

[Unregistered]

😳 well someone needs to crawl back in their hole

Hey Mr. Johnnie Cochran, why don't you inform us all who needs to go back in their hole, after you help Officer Fife learn to read a statute book?

LMAO

[Unregistered]

Well. Someone is embarrassed and Butt hurt