Results 11 to 20 of 25
-
06-18-2021, 12:33 AM #11
-
06-18-2021, 03:01 AM #12UnregisteredGuest
-
06-18-2021, 12:49 PM #13UnregisteredGuest
[QUOTE=Unregistered;3293903]I wish this were true, but realistically we all know nothing will happen because of the woke culture. He is here to stay![/QUOT
Yes and I'm sure that other black sheriff thought the same thing 😂😂
-
06-18-2021, 02:44 PM #14UnregisteredGuest
-
06-18-2021, 05:44 PM #15UnregisteredGuest
-
06-19-2021, 05:30 AM #16UnregisteredGuest
-
06-19-2021, 11:20 AM #17
-
06-20-2021, 07:55 PM #18UnregisteredGuest
BSO does not have them fooled one bit. In fact, they keep making it worse for themselves.
"An agency is not allowed to rely upon the Officers’ Bill of Rights to shield itself from its burden of proof in an unfair labor practice case involving allegations of retaliation where the purported retaliation is the initiation of an IA investigation. Accordingly, the hearing officer did not err in concluding that pursuant to Pasco, the BSO was obligated to present evidence demonstrating it had some other reason to suspend Bell."
-
06-20-2021, 08:57 PM #19UnregisteredGuest
Funny thing is IUPA could have just used Tony’s press conferences as proof. The main person that proved IUPA’s case was Tony himself. Now the big question. Does Bell sue under first amendment violation in federal court. Tony himself would be responsible for a civil rights violation, not the agency
-
06-21-2021, 11:11 AM #20UnregisteredGuest
Bookmarks