In-Service

[Unregistered]

What you meant to say was, they didn’t know people were reviewing the tax filings, they reported what they took in pay, got called out and now lie on tax filings. Not a far stretch, considering other people in the family falsify records. Which school was that?

Good question earlier. All the other ethical issues mentioned by the OP go uncontested?

I sure hope you aren't a detective. Didnt know these were being reviewed? Tax filings are public record. That means open to scrutiny at ANY time. Call for an audit if you think there's a problem.

The rest of your accusations are subjective gossip. You're just another disgruntled who didn't get your way and now hate your employer.

[Unregistered]

C’mon guys, its all just a clerical error. Who expects a charity which has been around for over 10 years to know how to file taxes. I mean, these guys only make financial decisions for a half a billon dollar public safety agency. It is not like they have a full legal staff of financial section to help them out.

[Unregistered]

C’mon guys, its all just a clerical error. Who expects a charity which has been around for over 10 years to know how to file taxes. I mean, these guys only make financial decisions for a half a billon dollar public safety agency. It is not like they have a full legal staff of financial section to help them out.

Or maybe you gossipy little geniuses could Barney Fife your way to figure out how to get an audit accomplished so we could put thos bs to bed once and for all.

Nope, without gossip you disgruntleds have nothing to talk about.

Oh wait, there's always the topic of how yer boy's gonna be reinstated as President again in August. Discuss amongst yourselves, losers!

[Unregistered]

“Yer” boy? Ah you have exposed yourself triggered one. “Yer” the joke here!

[Unregistered]

“Yer” boy? Ah you have exposed yourself triggered one. “Yer” the joke here!

You are truly a great detective. Get yourself a cookie.

[Unregistered]

“Yer” boy? Ah you have exposed yourself triggered one. “Yer” the joke here!

LOL! Looks like you got trump triggered!

[Unregistered]

When government agencies outsource basic services to third-party non-profit contractors, one consequence is that the public may lose its access to information about the service that the public would have retained, had a government agency carried out the service directly.[1]

A concern that previously public information will become privatized and inaccessible to the public when a government agency moves to contract out services to third-party vendors arises whether the third-party vendor is a non-profit organization or a for-profit organization. However, a number of key court cases in this area have arisen when non-profits have rebuffed requests for information under a state's right-to-know laws.

[Unregistered]

When government agencies outsource basic services to third-party non-profit contractors, one consequence is that the public may lose its access to information about the service that the public would have retained, had a government agency carried out the service directly.[1]

A concern that previously public information will become privatized and inaccessible to the public when a government agency moves to contract out services to third-party vendors arises whether the third-party vendor is a non-profit organization or a for-profit organization. However, a number of key court cases in this area have arisen when non-profits have rebuffed requests for information under a state's right-to-know laws.

If you are so worried about it, then take your concerns to the media and let them investigate on their own.

I have never seen any reason for concern, and frankly, am tired of seeing this unfounded gossip periodically rear it's ugly head.

But you won't take this anywhere. What would you have to gossip about then?

[Unregistered]

If you are so worried about it, then take your concerns to the media and let them investigate on their own.

I have never seen any reason for concern, and frankly, am tired of seeing this unfounded gossip periodically rear it's ugly head.

But you won't take this anywhere. What would you have to gossip about then?

Chad will pay off the media, like he's done in the past! He has to keep the "squeaky clean image" for the next election cycle. He's as dirty as they come. You idiots chose fruit, live with fruit🙃.

[Unregistered]

Chad will pay off the media, like he's done in the past! He has to keep the "squeaky clean image" for the next election cycle. He's as dirty as they come. You idiots chose fruit, live with fruit🙃.

More lies and gossip from a loser with nothing else to do.

Again, if you have proof of malfeasance, take it to a higher authority.

If not, stfu.