One of the three 666 has fallen two left
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    One of the three 666 has fallen two left

    666 better known as PBA clowns has fallen out of grace once again. Jenkins arrest for rape is just the latest of embarrassments.
    Now that 1, 2, & 3 are no more we need to rid ourselves of 1 & the new 2. Then 666 will be gone.

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    666 better known as PBA clowns has fallen out of grace once again. Jenkins's arrest for rape is just the latest of embarrassments.
    Now that 1, 2, & 3 are no more we need to rid ourselves of 1 & the new 2. Then 666 will be gone.
    Miami-Dade Police lieutenant [John Jenkins] arrested on rape charges in Palm Beach County, Michelle F. Solomon ABC Local 10, reported.

    We believe this is not a smear on MDPD, but the actions of a man with a failed character. What we do in life matters, especially what we do when no one is looking. Guess now, that felony rape charges were filed, Jenkins is relieved of duty WITHOUT PAY?


    https://www.local10.com/news/local/2...-beach-county/

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Miami-Dade Police lieutenant [John Jenkins] arrested on rape charges in Palm Beach County, Michelle F. Solomon ABC Local 10, reported.

    We believe this is not a smear on MDPD, but the actions of a man with a failed character. What we do in life matters, especially what we do when no one is looking. Guess now, that felony rape charges were filed, Jenkins is relieved of duty WITHOUT PAY?


    https://www.local10.com/news/local/2...-beach-county/
    It’s a smear on MDPD, our profession, the PBA, and men in general

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It’s a smear on MDPD, our profession, the PBA, and men in general
    IT IS NOT! None of the above CITED had anything to do with what Jenkins is accused, and are revolted by his alleged malfeasance.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    IT IS NOT! None of the above CITED had anything to do with what Jenkins is accused, and are revolted by his alleged malfeasance.
    In the case of MDPD, our “profession” is made up by the men and women who wear the brown gown. That profession is to be guarded jealously by the director, in this case Freddy Ramirez, and the newly minted overseer position currently held by J.D. Patterson. Sadly both of those leaders listed have known for years about John Jenkins’ failed character and have turned a blind eye. The members of this department, who should respect that brown gown, elected Jenkins to the second position on our bargaining unit and disregarded any concern for honor. You even had Patterson and Ramirez appointing Jenkins to the Orange Bowl Committee and considering him for a promotion to major.
    All things considered, I have to agree, John Jenkins is a smear on our department and our profession. Ramirez, Patterson and those who voted him for a leadership position at the PBA are even a greater smear and an embarrassment to the fine department we all signed on for. That is my humble opinion.

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    In the case of MDPD, our “profession” is made up by the men and women who wear the brown gown. That profession is to be guarded jealously by the director, in this case Freddy Ramirez, and the newly minted overseer position currently held by J.D. Patterson. Sadly both of those leaders listed have known for years about John Jenkins’ failed character and have turned a blind eye. The members of this department, who should respect that brown gown, elected Jenkins to the second position on our bargaining unit and disregarded any concern for honor. You even had Patterson and Ramirez appointing Jenkins to the Orange Bowl Committee and considering him for a promotion to major.
    All things considered, I have to agree, John Jenkins is a smear on our department and our profession. Ramirez, Patterson and those who voted him for a leadership position at the PBA are even a greater smear and an embarrassment to the fine department we all signed on for. That is my humble opinion.
    To the Executive Board!!!
    This is your chance! Strike while the iron is hot, demand FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS. You have all been aware of what's been going on. For the love of God, do the right thing and demand FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    IT IS NOT! None of the above CITED had anything to do with what Jenkins is accused, and are revolted by his alleged malfeasance.
    Well, let’s see. Who attended this high priced lavish 3 day gala? Who authorized Jenkins to attend the lavish event? Did they drink with Jenkins at any time? Did they notice a certain behavior? Other than paid for by members dues, who actually wrote the check? Where are all the selfies of this lavish extravaganza?

    The questions are endless. And, if the PBA gets sued, which hopefully it will, convince the jury PBA had nothing do with it.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Not difficult to figure out folks

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Well, let’s see. Who attended this high priced lavish 3 day gala? Who authorized Jenkins to attend the lavish event? Did they drink with Jenkins at any time? Did they notice a certain behavior? Other than paid for by members dues, who actually wrote the check? Where are all the selfies of this lavish extravaganza?

    The questions are endless. And, if the PBA gets sued, which hopefully it will, convince the jury PBA had nothing do with it.
    Of course! Jenkins wasn’t in attendance as an MDPD employee. He was there representing PBA and PBA is responsible- pure and simple

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Of course! Jenkins wasn’t in attendance as an MDPD employee. He was there representing PBA and PBA is responsible- pure and simple
    Stupid is as stupid does. Grown ass man alledgedly raped a woman is 100 percent his responsibility not mdpd not pba and not men or blacks, just his dumb ass!

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest

    PBA has been responsible since day one!

    When John Jenkins and Steadman all decided they were gonna run against John Rivera, They knew what Jenkins was like because Jenkins and the Sgt at Arms hired women on several occasions… it wasn’t a secret. The PBA Sgt at Arms hired a call girl for every event. He would fly them in from Other places for the weekend. He and Jenkins partied hard with many other women and it was well known. Jenkins has been an arrogant piece of crap for years. He has been going around saying how happy he is with his new wife and how he reads the Bible every day and how he’s never realized how beautiful life can be. He is nothing but fake, he is nothing but a liar, he is nothing but a cheat, he is nothing but a wife beater and a manipulator! he buys his sons love and he treats his daughter like shit. he is a piece of shit all the way around!!! and you know what?? this is definitely karma catching up to his ass, because he is no different today than he was in 1996 when he started this department he was a piece of work in the Academy, on the road, in the PBA, in PIO and he is what he is now. NO DAMN DIFFERENT.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •