Morales crying over proactivity

[Unregistered]

The city got their ass chewed by Suarez about crime being up and now Morales wants proactivity?!!!

If you want to be the next Allapattah 6 then go ahead. Look where proactivity took those idiots

[Unregistered]

The city got their ass chewed by Suarez about crime being up and now Morales wants proactivity?!!!

If you want to be the next Allapattah 6 then go ahead. Look where proactivity took those idiots

No he was crying because Uber East was late with his two double whoppers and two quarter pounders with cheese no pickle and his chocolate milk shake was watery.

[Unregistered]

The city got their ass chewed by Suarez about crime being up, and now Morales wants proactivity?!!!

If you want to be the next Allapattah 6, then go ahead. Look where proactivity took those idiots

Someone with fortitude must tell Francis Suarez that reducing crime and violent crime in particular, is much like making an omelet. You've got to crack some eggs to do it. Passive policy has never worked, no matter what labels community policing eggheads put upon it.

During his tenure as NYPD Police Commissioner, William Bratton, under Rudy Guliani's leadership, showed the Nation the way to crime reduction. In 1996, MDPD under Director Fred Taylor, following a similar approach, crushed violent crime in unincorporated Miami Dade County. Most police officers know how to detect potential criminal acts, based on their experience, training, and judicial application of FSS 901.151, Florida's Stop and Frisk Law. Those that do not must open, read, and internalize Section 901.151. The Section is modeled after the landmark, 1968 Terry v Ohio, Supreme Court decision, which has not been rescinded.

To be effective crime preventers, police officers need not be brutal nor violate suspects' Constitutional Rights. It is a fine line, we know, but it is the road we chose to trek. Ergo, we must walk that path, knowing how to apply the level of force necessary to overcome the offenders' level of resistance. It is that simple. The problems arise when we lie about why we used force, or worse, fabricate evidence to justify the unjustifiable. Then it becomes criminal.

Sadly, in today's political climate, elected and appointed bureaucrats can demand crime reduction to protect their elected and appointed jobs. Still, they will be the first to demand officers accused of excessive force when effecting crime prevention arrests be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law. No, the days when police officers could effectively engage in law enforcement are long gone. Our advice, handle your calls for service as best you can, and should your preliminary investigation develop probable cause to effect an immediate arrest, do it. Otherwise, push the paperwork up to detectives, and maybe they can arrest or best leave the case open pending. By today's Black Lives Matter's social standards, what difference does it make? Under these conditions, your mission is simple, survive until you have enough time to retire and then take the City of Miami for every penny due to you.

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/.../0901.151.html

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/392/1/

[Unregistered]

You treat your officers like sh1t and you’ll regret it every single day. Officers aren’t taking the abuse anymore. Officers dictate weather you keep your cushy spot or not. Keep abusing the backbone and you’ll be out of a job and crime will be at an all time high... and don’t worry, I answer my calls for service so there is not a SINGLE thing you can do.

[Unregistered]

You got that right only calls for service.