Results 21 to 30 of 40
-
10-28-2020, 06:01 PM #21UnregisteredGuest
-
10-28-2020, 06:13 PM #22UnregisteredGuest
So, what :justification" will be floated for issuing tactical load beaing vests next?
Ballistic vests are heavy and hot. The greater level of protection they provide, the heavier and hotter they become. That is why most LEOs leave their issue bullet resistant vests in the trunk of their cars. External vests are no different. If issued, a few tacticool cowboys will wear them and the rest of the force will leave them in the trunks of their cars.
-
10-29-2020, 01:11 AM #23UnregisteredGuest
Definitely time for LBV; we carry more these days and well established science supports it. Now with cameras it’s just one more thing to carry.
-
10-29-2020, 02:12 AM #24UnregisteredGuest
No one is demanding that "tactical" vests be issued to patrol, similar to TSU or K9 wear. They are asking for a modified version of the current one issued by the agency. One where you can actually move gear from your belt to the vest to reduce pressure and weight from hips and lower back. Look at this article which was backed by a scientific study (https://www.police1.com/officer-safe...KXHhAdMdbM2qR/)
Also, yes, the job was completed without LBVs in the past but technology changes and updates for the better. If you truly believe that we shouldn't change with the time, go turn in you Glock and demand a revolver because semi-autos are too militaristic. Go give back your radio and LED flashlight because they definitely didn't have those exact models fifty years ago. Don't forget to give back your patrol vehicle with the laptop in it too.
-
10-29-2020, 06:42 AM #25UnregisteredGuest
Thank you for the book report snowflake. Now get back out there and shag calls. 😂😂😂
-
10-29-2020, 10:48 AM #26UnregisteredGuest
Bob just spent $3 million on body cams to please the liberals and get elected so there is no petty cash in the kitty for vests or any other equipment.
-
10-29-2020, 01:40 PM #27UnregisteredGuest
Most LEOs leave their vest in the trunk? You're insane. Youre obviously not LEO and obviously dont work for the agency. You literally have ti sign a waiver if you refuse to wear a vest. Ive three Deputies in my career that didnt wear a vest, and they're retired now.
Go away.
-
10-29-2020, 07:02 PM #28
-
10-29-2020, 08:02 PM #29UnregisteredGuest
-
10-31-2020, 12:50 AM #30UnregisteredGuest
What agency did you work for and for how long? During my career, many LEOs didn't wear their vests. They ended up in the trunk because they were hot, made the LEO sweat and smell bad. In fact, of the first five deputies who responded to the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas HS shooting, three had to remove their vests from the trunk of their unit and the SRO wasn't wearing one at all. As for a waiver, well, I have seen thousands of waivers accepted because the LEO supposedly developed a "rash" from sweating in their hot, bullet resistant vests. And, the administration allowed it because they didn't care if vests were worn or not, as long as they did not have any liability for the LEO NOT wearing the vest. You know who is most likely to actually wear their issue vest? Rookies. But, as soon as they see the veterans going "commando", they follow suit.
Bookmarks