Results 1 to 10 of 13
-
10-23-2020, 07:44 PM #1UnregisteredGuest
Miami SAO to try to stretch charges against Officer Ubeda
The pathetic Miami SAO that can't have their resources prosecute a simple habitual trespasser let alone a murderer is going to use their energy to try to bring charges against a officer who endorsed the "wrong" candidate.
Like Miami people say, "irregardless" officer Ubeda already casted his vote for #TRUMP2020 and nobody not even the sorry arse Miami SAO can take that vote back
-
10-23-2020, 07:45 PM #2UnregisteredGuest
-
10-23-2020, 09:55 PM #3UnregisteredGuest
-
10-24-2020, 01:40 AM #4UnregisteredGuest
But when you’re in unform You can do commercials for Carlos Gimenez, Esteban Bovo, and Anna Rodriguez. Oh and you can use county equipment ie. Police vehicle.
If the indict Ubeda, then the only righteous thing to do it indict those who appear in the commercials I just mentioned.
Fair is fair
-
10-24-2020, 04:45 AM #5
-
10-24-2020, 05:34 PM #6UnregisteredGuest
You say like he didn't know what was going to happen
The man did not become a cop yesterday. He like most cops are fed up with the bs and hypocrisy from the liberals that hate Trump because of who he is and what he stands for.
Good for him. I hope he is enjoying his paid suspension aka vacation. He won't be working during the riots part 2 when Trump gets re-elected thanks to his vote
-
10-24-2020, 05:37 PM #7UnregisteredGuest
-
10-24-2020, 05:38 PM #8UnregisteredGuest
-
10-24-2020, 06:16 PM #9UnregisteredGuest
I hope this answers your question?
FSS 104.31 Political activities of the state, county, and municipal officers and employees.
(1) No officer or employee of the state, or any county or municipality thereof, except as hereinafter exempted from provisions hereof, shall:
(a) Use his or her official authority or "influence" for the purpose of interfering with an election or a nomination of office or coercing or influencing another person’s vote or affecting the result thereof. An officer or civilian donning an item that identifies the wearer's support for a particular candidate or cause falls under the "influence" clause. As Police Officers -- when on duty and in uniform -- representing our employing State, County, or municipality, we must not convey any political favoritism whatsoever. Sadly, this officer's support for President Trump may cause him dearly.
Long ago, when I served at MDPD, as elections dates approached, the Legal Bureau, at the Director's instruction, would issue a Legal Note reminding all employees, sworn and civilians, as to restrictions governing our behavior during the political season. Did Ramirez III direct such issuance?
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/...s/0104.31.html
-
10-24-2020, 08:42 PM #10UnregisteredGuest
With Rundle one never knows. She has charged officers with attempted murder on battery cases.
But, she better be prepared to charge a bunch of people
Bookmarks