More burnout
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
 

Thread: More burnout

  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    More burnout

    Perceived Organizational Support
    Ian Adams, Sharon H. Mastracci
    Published 2019
    Psychology
    Police Quarterly
    “Police departments in the United States are rapidly adopting body-worn cameras (BWCs). To date, no study has investigated the effects of BWCs on police officers themselves, despite evidence suggesting negative effects of electronic performance monitoring on employee well-being. Police officers already experience higher levels of burnout than other professions. We hypothesize that the intense surveillance of BWCs will manifest in how police officers perceive the organizational support of their departments and will increase burnout. We test these hypotheses using data from patrol officers (n = 271) and structural equation modeling. We find BWCs increase police officer burnout, and this effect is statistically different from zero. We also find that BWCs decrease officers’ perceived organizational support, which mediates the relationship between BWCs and burnout. Greater perceived organizational support can blunt the negative effects of BWCs. Our study is the first to situate effects on officers at the center of BWC literature.”

    When are cops going to matter? Why do our leaders listen to criminals instead of us?

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Perceived Organizational Support
    Ian Adams, Sharon H. Mastracci
    Published 2019
    Psychology
    Police Quarterly
    “Police departments in the United States are rapidly adopting body-worn cameras (BWCs). To date, no study has investigated the effects of BWCs on police officers themselves, despite evidence suggesting negative effects of electronic performance monitoring on employee well-being. Police officers already experience higher levels of burnout than other professions. We hypothesize that the intense surveillance of BWCs will manifest in how police officers perceive the organizational support of their departments and will increase burnout. We test these hypotheses using data from patrol officers (n = 271) and structural equation modeling. We find BWCs increase police officer burnout, and this effect is statistically different from zero. We also find that BWCs decrease officers’ perceived organizational support, which mediates the relationship between BWCs and burnout. Greater perceived organizational support can blunt the negative effects of BWCs. Our study is the first to situate effects on officers at the center of BWC literature.”

    When are cops going to matter? Why do our leaders listen to criminals instead of us?
    Perfect! This can help us to reduce the current 30 year minimum needed to retire to 20 years instead of 25!!!

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Perceived Organizational Support
    Ian Adams, Sharon H. Mastracci
    Published 2019
    Psychology
    Police Quarterly
    “Police departments in the United States are rapidly adopting body-worn cameras (BWCs). To date, no study has investigated the effects of BWCs on police officers themselves, despite evidence suggesting negative effects of electronic performance monitoring on employee well-being. Police officers already experience higher levels of burnout than other professions. We hypothesize that the intense surveillance of BWCs will manifest in how police officers perceive the organizational support of their departments and will increase burnout. We test these hypotheses using data from patrol officers (n = 271) and structural equation modeling. We find BWCs increase police officer burnout, and this effect is statistically different from zero. We also find that BWCs decrease officers’ perceived organizational support, which mediates the relationship between BWCs and burnout. Greater perceived organizational support can blunt the negative effects of BWCs. Our study is the first to situate effects on officers at the center of BWC literature.”

    When are cops going to matter? Why do our leaders listen to criminals instead of us?
    Boswell, and McMullen, will get rid of the body worn cameras. DRAIN THE SWAMP!

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Boswell, and McMullen, will get rid of the body worn cameras. DRAIN THE SWAMP!
    You are comparing these two to all that our great leader, I mean the President, has "accomplished", like "draining the swamp" and "building the wall"?? Oh dear, that is a pathetic comparison.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    You are comparing these two to all that our great leader, I mean the President, has "accomplished", like "draining the swamp" and "building the wall"?? Oh dear, that is a pathetic comparison.
    Jealousy! Fear of loosing?

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Jealousy! Fear of loosing?

    Nope, just saying don't compare the other guys to a proven sexist philandering misogynist who uses Christianity as a tool. No one deserves that, not even Boswell.

    Yo, for the 20th time, it's "LOSING", not "loosing". Bill Gates gave us the gift of spell-and grammar-check, USE IT!

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Welcome to the jungle baby, you gonna die😳

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Boswell, and McMullen, will get rid of the body worn cameras. DRAIN THE SWAMP!
    No they will not, they may say diff now just to get elected, but trust they will stay in place!

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Are you really criticizing someone's spelling and grammar while using so many spelling and grammar errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post


    Yo, for the 20th time, it's "LOSING", not "loosing". Bill Gates gave us the gift of spell-and grammar-check, USE IT!
    (Hey you {"Yo" is not a word}), for the (twentieth {A Cardinal Number is a number that says how many of something there are, such as one, two, three, four, five}) time, it's ("losing" {lower case letters})(,{no space after the quotation mark})(.{period immediately after the quotation mark}) Bill Gates gave us the gift of spel(ling)(,{no"-"})and grammar(no"-")check(.)U(se {lower case letters})(it {lower case letters})(.{periods go at the end of declarative sentences})

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    No they will not, they may say diff now just to get elected, but trust they will stay in place!
    Ok Chad...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •