FDLE Agent commits Battery on Civilian
Results 1 to 10 of 10
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    FDLE Agent commits Battery on Civilian

    Where's the investigation on the FDLE Agent committing battery on a civilian during a press briefing by the Governor? FDLE using force to remove someone at a public event is not a proper use of force!!

    Where's the investigation?


  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Or, a protester disrupting a news conference was asked to leave, refused, and had to be removed, I'm just saying....

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    If there was indeed a complaint against the Agent, you better believe they'd throw him under the bus and then start a process of driving forward and back. No way the current administration backs ANY Agent with any controversy.

    And of course, PBA would be useless as made by Swearingen and the weak PBA Reps.

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Where's the investigation on the FDLE Agent committing battery on a civilian during a press briefing by the Governor? FDLE using force to remove someone at a public event is not a proper use of force!!

    Where's the investigation?

    It's legitimate, play stupid games, get ejected!!!

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    These were media dweebs! What about the presser where the PROTESTERS got past the pos detail? WTF were the agents doing when the got in the building? Let’s here it for security?? Typical.

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    These were media dweebs! What about the presser where the PROTESTERS got past the pos detail? WTF were the agents doing when the got in the building? Let’s here it for security?? Typical.
    When you know nothing about what actually happened, it's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. Just saying...

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Bottom line is FDLE didn't handle this the right way.. when an Agent has to put hands on a media person and had no authority to do so, that's battery.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest

    By the numbers...

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Bottom line is FDLE didn't handle this the right way.. when an Agent has to put hands on a media person and had no authority to do so, that's battery.
    1. Was the media person disruptive?
    2. If the media person was disruptive, then was he told to leave, based on competent authority?
    3. Did the media person refuse to leave?

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Fact is FDLE if you put your hands on someone they need to go to jail because you were using force necessary to effect an arrest. If you made no arrest then you committed battery because you had no probable cause. What a bunch of podunks!!!!

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Fact is FDLE if you put your hands on someone they need to go to jail because you were using force necessary to effect an arrest. If you made no arrest then you committed battery because you had no probable cause. What a bunch of podunks!!!!
    Oh so you are saying it is absolutley impossible to un-arrest? So if you detain someone during an investigation and discover that probable cause does not exist, do you make up a charge becuase in your own words, you cannot un-arrest.

    You are the obvious problem in law enforcement!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •