Civilian review panel item passes

[Unregistered]

Where was PLEA on this? Why didn’t they do or say anything about this? Protectors of law enforcement my ass!!!!! More like chickens! At least PBA sent a BS letter!!!!!

LMAO Steadman. You do get funnier the more you are under heavy criticism. On one post you say stay away and let us big boy’s handle this. Yet now you say where were you.
Well, we were watching the shit show created by you, the big boys. We enjoy every minute Steadman. Thanks for the entertainment man.

[Unregistered]

LMAO Steadman. You do get funnier the more you are under heavy criticism. On one post you say stay away and let us big boy’s handle this. Yet now you say where were you.
Well, we were watching the shit show created by you, the big boys. We enjoy every minute Steadman. Thanks for the entertainment man.

Ok Domingo, AKA Biden. Why don’t you answer the question Domingo? It’s very simple. Where is PLEA’s response?

[Unregistered]

Steadman dropped the ball on this one big time. Sure he screwed up other things regularly but this item he must have been bought somehow.
He didn’t even put up a phony fight. What a POS he is.

Steadman and PBA got us 5 of the 13 commissioners allowing for a veto if 9 instead of 8 it would be veto proof. They are working on veto now with Gimenez.

[Unregistered]

Sadly this tribulation is not over. Come November 3, County voters could approve the Civilian Review Panel (CRP) ballot initiative, codifying it as a County Ordinance – law. Then as cited therein, the CRP could exercise its subpoena power to compel civilian employees to testify under peril of losing their jobs. Should that come to pass, research and consultation with legal minds have indicated that a subpoenaed civilian, compelled to testify under threat of losing his or her job, would automatically be granted Transactional Immunity, or "total" immunity, completely protecting the witness from future prosecution for crimes related to his or her testimony.” I wonder whether the County Attorneys who drafted the proposed CRP Ordinance took that under consideration.

We know that pursuant to the 2017 Florida Supreme Court decision in D’Agastino v. City of Miami, the CRP cannot subpoena sworn members, so I will no delve into it more than this. Let us assume the CRP “invites” officers to testify, ploy you must not discard as a possible, subtle weapon against you, what then? One will have to be very stupid to appear under this condition to appear.

As an illustration, I will transition into the City of Miami CRB ordinance, readers will discern just how feckless Miami’s CIP is, as the County’s CRP will be. Here are two examples derived from Miami’s CIP ordinance:

(a) When a city employee appears before the CIP in response to a subpoena, such employee shall be formally advised prior to the commencement of testimony that if the employee has a good-faith belief that the testimony would tend to be self-incriminating, [Fifth Amendment] and if, in reliance upon that good-faith belief, the employee declines to answer any question, that the employee's decision not to provide testimony will not subject him or her to any adverse employment consequences

(b) A police officer who is the subject of an investigation shall be informed of the nature of the investigation and provided with a copy of the complaint prior to being “interrogated.” This clause, of course, as a result of D’Agastino v. City of Miami is void. Because of FSS 112.532, the civilian panel cannot subpoena a sworn member, less “interrogate” the subject or witness officer(s).

Clearly Miami’s ordinance, Sec. 11.5-33 - Procedures related to city employees and witnesses, (a) and (b) conflict.
So, should voters, on November 3, approve the County’s CRP Ordinance, fret not, it cannot subpoena and less “interrogate” sworn members. But should the CRP dare to subpoena a Dade County deputy sheriff, PBA attorneys should have the form letter already drafted, stating. My client, Deputy Sheriff XYZ, will not appear.

As always, if you have 25 or more years, RETIRE! Policing has stopped being a calling, a vocation, and not even a job one should risk life and treasure on. Let Barbara Jordan and her ilk patrol Unincorporated Miami Dade, particularly in Florida City!


https://law.justia.com/cases/florida.../sc16-645.html

https://library.municode.com/fl/miam...A_S11.5-32SUPO

[Unregistered]

Steadman and PBA got us 5 of the 13 commissioners allowing for a veto if 9 instead of 8 it would be veto proof. They are working on veto now with Gimenez.

And Steadman got us a 10-3 vote to Put the item On the ballot which will pass. Steadman has been played once again. It easy with a
Moron the likes of Steadman

[Unregistered]

And Steadman got us a 10-3 vote to Put the item On the ballot which will pass. Steadman has been played once again. It easy with a
Moron the likes of Steadman

Domingo, PBA doesn’t have a vote you moron. It’s the BCC. So place the blame at the right person who are the elected commission. By the way, what did you do on this particular item??? Did you talk to them? Email? Letter? Hell... did you show your face?!

[Unregistered]

Domingo, PBA doesn’t have a vote you moron. It’s the BCC. So place the blame at the right person who are the elected commission. By the way, what did you do on this particular item??? Did you talk to them? Email? Letter? Hell... did you show your face?!

Yet again another example of PLEA’s failures! Domingo doesn’t even know the facts.

Fire your president! ✊🏿

[Unregistered]

We found the one that is one with Steadman onsession
https://www.facebook.com/steadman.st...15286283177118

[Unregistered]

Yet again another example of PLEA’s failures! Domingo doesn’t even know the facts.

Fire your president! ✊🏿

He’s all talk. Has never done anything other than taking our dues. Command staff literally laughs about him. He’s a joke.

[Unregistered]

He’s all talk. Has never done anything other than taking our dues. Command staff literally laughs about him. He’s a joke.

Agreed! Everyone laughs at Steadman Stahl. He is a moron with a Badge who also happens to have close friends and family members who are criminals