Results 31 to 40 of 53
-
07-08-2020, 05:55 PM #31UnregisteredGuest
Is Sheriff Knight am elected official or a
Law Enforcement Officer? Because elected officials do not fall under marcy’s law. Sorry
-
07-08-2020, 07:26 PM #32UnregisteredGuest
ANALYSIS: In a recent case in June (last month), an officer was a victim of aggravated battery, so under the guise of Marcy's Law, the officer's name was scrubbed from the police report, during a public records request. In a subsequent court battle, Leon County Circuit Judge Charles Dodson refused to allow the officer's name to be redacted or scrubbed from the report.
QUESTION: In Sheriff Tom Knight's case, he left his personal wallet, cash, credit cards and other items in a Sarasota Sheriff's Office vehicle, which was burglarized. Is Kurt Hoffman presenting a legal analysis that Knight's name should be scrubbed from public records under Marcy's Law?
-
07-08-2020, 08:12 PM #33
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 450
Judge refuses to keep secret the identity of officer who was a victim
Originally Posted by “Karl Etters on June 5 of 2020”
https://www.crestviewbulletin.com/ne...local-shootingJournalism can never be silent: that is its greatest virtue and its greatest fault. It must speak, and speak immediately, while the echoes of wonder, the claims of triumph and the signs of horror are still in the air.
-
07-08-2020, 08:26 PM #34UnregisteredGuest
Knight is a victim of his own negligent actions
- Sarasota Sheriff’s Office “general orders” stipulate that sworn personnel are on-duty when they drive agency-issued vehicles.
. - Sheriff Tom Knight did the following while on-duty:
(a) Drove and parked his agency issued vehicle.
(b) Left his wallet, cash, credit cards and other items unattended and overnight in his agency-issued vehicle.
. - Knight’s on-duty actions resulted in him becoming a victim.
. - Knight’s victimization was preventable. If Knight had taken his personal property with him, instead of leaving it unattended and overnight in his agency-issued department, then he would not be a crime victim. Knight’s negligence while on-duty made him a victim of a burglary.
. - Knight’s on-duty actions demonstrated poor judgement, which reflect unfavorably on the Sarasota Sheriff’s Office. That is not a sufficient legal reason to hide, shield or scrub his identity from public view, nor from media inquiries.
- Sarasota Sheriff’s Office “general orders” stipulate that sworn personnel are on-duty when they drive agency-issued vehicles.
-
07-09-2020, 09:43 PM #35UnregisteredGuest
Black boy arrested for breaking into Sheriff Tom Knight’s vehicle:
Originally Posted by “Carlos R. Munoz”
-
07-09-2020, 10:21 PM #36UnregisteredGuest
Hey Carlos are you a reporter or a water boy for Knight? Just be honest and tell us all.
-
07-10-2020, 03:19 PM #37UnregisteredGuest
Knight could not prevent the department vehicle from being burglarized, but he could have prevented himself from becoming a victim by not leaving his cash and credit cards unattended in the vehicle. However, that would involve using common sense and exercising personal responsibility. How many people leave cash and credit cards unattended in their vehicle? Only a teenager or a clueless adult does that.
-
07-12-2020, 03:21 PM #38UnregisteredGuest
I don't bring in my extra id card or my extra badge/badge clip. Am I suppose to strip my car down overnight? Come on lets be realistic. Is their GO that say otherwise??
-
07-12-2020, 03:28 PM #39UnregisteredGuest
Leaving cash & credit cards overnight in vehicle is poor judgement on Knight's part
-
07-12-2020, 11:42 PM #40UnregisteredGuest
Bookmarks