Javi your name made it on the Miami Herald today! Front page story

[Unregistered]

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...243759987.html

Eventually you'll day will come you racist pos.

[Unregistered]

Can’t read the article. Don’t have the subscription. Can you post the article.

[Unregistered]

Three Federal Judges Rule Ortiz Was Justified
Sorry Nestor and Tapanes.


Nestor, please stop wasting our time like you did last week coming to IA. No one cares

1. Ortiz
Ortiz asserts the district court erred in denying him qualified immunity as a matter of law. Specifically, he contends that his conduct is clearly shown in the video, and that his conduct does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation. He asserts his conduct amounts to an ordinary takedown measure, and that there is no guiding case from this Court or the Supreme Court that would put him on notice that an ordinary takedown measure would rise to the level of excessive force by virtue of an unforeseeable serious injury.
8

Case: 18-12368 Date Filed: 10/10/2019 Page: 9 of 17
Although the Fourth Amendment guarantees the right to be free from the use of excessive force during the course of an arrest, “not every push or shove, even if it may later seem unnecessary in the peace of a judge’s chambers, violates the Fourth Amendment.” Saucier, 533 U.S. at 209 (quotations omitted). “[T]he right to make an arrest or investigatory stop necessarily carries with it the right to use some degree of physical coercion or threat thereof to effect it.” Graham v.
Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989). “In order to determine whether the amount of force used by a police officer was proper, a court must ask whether a reasonable officer would believe this level of force is necessary in the situation at hand.” Lee, 284 F.3d at 1197 (quotations omitted). “[T]he ‘reasonableness’ inquiry in an excessive force case is an objective one: the question is whether the officers’ actions are ‘objectively reasonable’ in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or motivation.” Graham, 490 U.S. at 397. “In applying the Graham objective-reasonableness standard, our circuit has identified three factors to evaluate for determining if the force used by an officer in making an arrest was objectively reasonable: (1) the need for the application of force, (2) the relationship between the need and amount of force used, and (3) the extent of the injury inflicted.” Stephens v. DeGiovanni, 852 F.3d 1298, 1324 (11th Cir. 2017) (quotations omitted).
9

Case: 18-12368 Date Filed: 10/10/2019 Page: 10 of 17
As to the need for force, while the police were trying to clear the street, Alexandre yelled “we ain’t going home tonight,” “we are taxpayers,” and “don’t take this bullshit from them.” Once he was on the sidewalk, he told the officers to “[g]et the **** out of here and do your business.” A reasonable officer in Ortiz’s position could think Alexandre posed a threat to other officers and the crowd, and police officers are often called upon to make split-second judgments “in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving,” Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 135 S. Ct. 2466, 2474 (2015) (quotations omitted). Therefore, Ortiz was entitled to use some degree of force in taking Alexandre down to effectuate the arrest. See Durruthy v. Pastor, 351 F.3d 1080, 1094 (11th Cir. 2003) (“This circuit has made clear that some use of force by a police officer when making a custodial arrest is necessary and altogether lawful, regardless of the severity of the alleged offense.”). After Alexandre is taken down to the ground, the video shows that Ortiz is not involved in the pile of officers on top of Alexandre. Instead, he had his back to the other officers and Alexandre.4 When he returns to the pile, he is in view of the camera at the lower half of Alexandre’s body, and the video does not show him hitting or kicking Alexandre.

[Unregistered]

Javi thank you for still mentioning my name!! Hope you're doing well. I got news for you... You ain't no Negro! Your a white Hispanic Latin male. We all know you changed your race Thinking it was going to give you an advantage on the promotional exam. That's just what you do. You knew exactly what you were doing and if anything went wrong you were going to have the union pay for your legal defense.

You're always thinking your smarter than everyone. Your always looking out for #1 the same way you scammed that 15% hazardous management pay on the last contract for yourself. Not a good time to be ROD,

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/...black-n1119706

[Unregistered]

So much hate, but Javi is getting paid while Nestor is pimping out his whore wife for five dollars.
Imagine the amount of gas you spent driving back and forth to IA. You could’ve used that money to pay for the meds for your wife’s UTI

[Unregistered]

True but his having fun retired collecting a pension. Javi is Stuck at home like a prisoner in a cage with his two dogs Mon -Friday. MPD is Ortiz's life! 6-month ROD is not a joke even if your getting paid.

[Unregistered]

nestor left with an officer's pension. if his life was so great, his house would not be in foreclosure

[Unregistered]

True but his having fun retired collecting a pension. Javi is Stuck at home like a prisoner in a cage with his two dogs Mon -Friday. MPD is Ortiz's life! 6-month ROD is not a joke even if your getting paid.

Catch him on telegram in charge and leading the next waive of followers

[Unregistered]

Catch him on telegram in charge and leading the next waive of followers

And it’s working

[Unregistered]

Javi stop acting like if you have authority on telegram! Stop the us against them attitude