+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 51
 

Thread: Where you at

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Where you at

    For a sheriff that has been on tv for everything lately, why is Whidden not on there now telling us what happened. No PIO?

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    For a sheriff that has been on tv for everything lately, why is Whidden not on there now telling us what happened. No PIO?
    The only things which matter, are the deps are ok? will the deps be election year sacrifices? did they lawyer up to protect their rights. a block party with 400-500 people. safe bet there were more guns at that "block party" than there were on duty.

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Fishing

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The only things which matter, are the deps are ok? will the deps be election year sacrifices? did they lawyer up to protect their rights. a block party with 400-500 people. safe bet there were more guns at that "block party" than there were on duty.
    That’s where he was. No back up. No plan. No leadership.

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    He was fishing with his felon buddies while his untrained deputies violated civil rights.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Chapter 870 affrays; riots; routs; unlawful assemblies.....

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    He was fishing with his felon buddies while his untrained deputies violated civil rights.
    Separate the Sheriff from the deputies here.

    Whatever the Sheriff was doing or not at the time of the incident is irrelevant.

    What is relevant is 3 deputies were involved in an incident, a "block party", of 400-500 people, who basically had a "F the police" attitude "we do what we want, etc etc" "this is our community", the same crowd when lawfully ordered to disperse, refused.

    If you know how to read, above the junior high level, read the https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/Chapter870, "CHAPTER 870 AFFRAYS; RIOTS; ROUTS; UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLIES"

    The deputies showed remarkable restraint. Critique the Sheriff all you want. Not the deputies.

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest

    True

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Separate the Sheriff from the deputies here.

    Whatever the Sheriff was doing or not at the time of the incident is irrelevant.

    What is relevant is 3 deputies were involved in an incident, a "block party", of 400-500 people, who basically had a "F the police" attitude "we do what we want, etc etc" "this is our community", the same crowd when lawfully ordered to disperse, refused.

    If you know how to read, above the junior high level, read the https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/Chapter870, "CHAPTER 870 AFFRAYS; RIOTS; ROUTS; UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLIES"

    The deputies showed remarkable restraint. Critique the Sheriff all you want. Not the deputies.

    The deputies were placed in a horrible position. Lack of planning ,organization and ,leadership This event did not surprise us. People knew it was going to occur. Nothing was done to prepare for it. Look at 101s Facebook post he knew what happens at these block parties. He left the deputies out to hang.

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Restraint?

    Statute states failure to disperse. Going to be difficult justifying shooting two from behind while running away and then additional shots after already down. Who's on the hook for the attorney fees with these deputies when suits are filed? Tax payers again?



    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Separate the Sheriff from the deputies here.

    Whatever the Sheriff was doing or not at the time of the incident is irrelevant.

    What is relevant is 3 deputies were involved in an incident, a "block party", of 400-500 people, who basically had a "F the police" attitude "we do what we want, etc etc" "this is our community", the same crowd when lawfully ordered to disperse, refused.

    If you know how to read, above the junior high level, read the https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2018/Chapter870, "CHAPTER 870 AFFRAYS; RIOTS; ROUTS; UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLIES"

    The deputies showed remarkable restraint. Critique the Sheriff all you want. Not the deputies.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    He was fishing with his felon buddies while his untrained deputies violated civil rights.
    He was fishing with his felon buddies - Maybe. Doesn't matter.

    untrained deputies ? - Care to publish your training records ? Your expertise, even your basic certificates?

    deputies violated civil rights ? Whose? How so? List the rights you claim were violated. Go look up online "rights", copy a few of them down to quote to sound remotely educated.

    Are you a opportunist "community leader" looking to sell tickets for your own gain? Go hold your own press conference of 1 somewhere else. Create you own YouTube channel and give yourself a title.

    More people are interested in the rights of the deputies. Will Steve sell them out for the illusion of getting votes from a community which takes 20 times more in resources than it contributes?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •