Protecting SH

[Unregistered]

Why is the Mod deleting posts about SH why does SH need to be protected? The Joneses get talked to badly on this website nothing happens the truths about SH come out the mods go into a deleting frenzy. Fine example of Santa Rosa your a bunch of corrupt Cops.

[Unregistered]

Why is the Mod deleting posts about SH why does SH need to be protected? The Joneses get talked to badly on this website nothing happens the truths about SH come out the mods go into a deleting frenzy. Fine example of Santa Rosa your a bunch of corrupt Cops.

The truth about Joneses bad treatment from Milton finest gets deleted not when they attack Joneses wide or him. The truth about SH scumbag gets out they delete it I smell a pattern. Hmmm

[Mod 732]

Until now, 99% of the deleted posts were Randy Jones related. Of those, 99% were disparaging against Mr. Jones and his wife. The other posts were deleted at the direction of Mod 1 but not against Mr. Jones himself.

Not all Scott Haines posts were deleted. The ones that were in gross violation of the Terms of Use were deleted. Some contained sexual content, hate and abusive comments.

Also deleted was the thread about Tiger King. That thread was definitely a hateful post about a retired/disabled deputy and one of her sons. The thread was definitely a gross violation of TOU. Furthermore, she's not employed with SRSO so why even bring her up at all?

If you have an objection regarding deleting the posts that were libelous, had vulgar and sexual content, and so on, please don't hesitate to contact Mod 1.

Otherwise, post away.

[Mod 732]

My moderating "partner" 733 and myself have both deleted threads regarding Tiger King and how it allegedly correlates with a retired/disabled deputy sheriff and her son.

Regardless of your opinion on how she may or may or may not have a resemblance to someone on Netflix, the subject matter in itself is irrelevant to this forum, not to mention violating the Terms of Use because it essentially defames the retired deputies character by associating her with someone portrayed as a notorious individual that has been implied as someone who may have murdered her husband or had him murdered or whatever. (For the record, I have not nor will never watch that show).

Any further TOU violations will be submitted to Mod 1 for review.

Thanks

Mod 732