Where in the World is the Great Max?

[Unregistered]

Does anyone know where the great Max has gone to it appears that with all this Capt. Ortiz side show occurring the Great Max has gone underground. Has anyone else noticed that someone is feeding our Commissioners specific intel or dirt on key topics which are being used against our Chief and others from our department.

Could this secert double agent be The Great Max or is this just a coincidence?

[Unregistered]

Secret dirt? Wow ! Why would it be a secret if nobody, especially Chief Colina is doing anything wrong? Unless he is and they are dancing around and misleading the commissioners. Colina think about retiring when your on top. Ortiz is taking everyone done. Deputy City Manager, the manager, Destephan and your next with several members of your staff.

[Unregistered]

Tampering with a Witness is defined in Florida Statute Section 914.22(1). To prove Tampering with a Witness, the State must prove: You knowingly used or attempted to use intimidation or physical force against the victim, or.

[Unregistered]

Tampering with a Witness is defined in Florida Statute Section 914.22(1). To prove Tampering with a Witness, the State must prove: You knowingly used or attempted to use intimidation or physical force against the victim, or.

That a felony boys. That means subpoena and search warrants could be issued.

Like your attorney should be telling you both you have the right to remain silent anything you say or do could held against you in a court of law.

[Unregistered]

Whistle blower statue



112.3187 Adverse action against employee for disclosing information of specified nature prohibited; employee remedy and relief.—
(1) SHORT TITLE.—Sections 112.3187-112.31895 may be cited as the “Whistle-blower’s Act.”
(2) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.—It is the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against an employee who reports to an appropriate agency violations of law on the part of a public employer or independent contractor that create a substantial and specific danger to the public’s health, safety, or welfare. It is further the intent of the Legislature to prevent agencies or independent contractors from taking retaliatory action against any person who discloses information to an appropriate agency alleging improper use of governmental office, gross waste of funds, or any other abuse or gross neglect of duty on the part of an agency, public officer, or employee.
(3) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this act, unless otherwise specified, the following words or terms shall have the meanings indicated:
(a) “Agency” means any state, regional, county, local, or municipal government entity, whether executive, judicial, or legislative; any official, officer, department, division, bureau, commission, authority, or political subdivision therein; or any public school, community college, or state university.
(b) “Employee” means a person who performs services for, and under the control and direction of, or contracts with, an agency or independent contractor for wages or other remuneration.
(c) “Adverse personnel action” means the discharge, suspension, transfer, or demotion of any employee or the withholding of bonuses, the reduction in salary or benefits, or any other adverse action taken against an employee within the terms and conditions of employment by an agency or independent contractor.

(e) “Gross mismanagement” means a continuous pattern of managerial abuses, wrongful or arbitrary and capricious actions, or fraudulent or criminal conduct which may have a substantial adverse economic impact.
(4) ACTIONS PROHIBITED.—
(a) An agency or independent contractor shall not dismiss, discipline, or take any other adverse personnel action against an employee for disclosing information pursuant to the provisions of this section.
(b) An agency or independent contractor shall not take any adverse action that affects the rights or interests of a person in retaliation for the person’s disclosure of information under this section.
(c) The provisions of this subsection shall not be applicable when an employee or person discloses information known by the employee or person to be false.
(5) NATURE OF INFORMATION DISCLOSED.—The information disclosed under this section must include:
(a) Any violation or suspected violation of any federal, state, or local law, rule, or regulation committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor which creates and presents a substantial and specific danger to the public’s health, safety, or welfare.
(b) Any act or suspected act of gross mismanagement, malfeasance, misfeasance, gross waste of public funds, suspected or actual Medicaid fraud or abuse, or gross neglect of duty committed by an employee or agent of an agency or independent contractor.
(6) TO WHOM INFORMATION DISCLOSED.—The information disclosed under this section must be disclosed to any agency or federal government entity having the authority to investigate, police, manage, or otherwise remedy the violation or act, including, but not limited to, the Office of the Chief Inspector General, an agency inspector general or the employee designated as agency inspector general under s. 112.3189(1) or inspectors general under s. 20.055, the Florida Commission on Human Relations, and the whistle-blower’s hotline created under s. 112.3189. However, for disclosures concerning a local governmental entity, including any regional, county, or municipal entity, special district, community college district, or school district or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, the information must be disclosed to a chief executive officer as defined in s. 447.203(9) or other appropriate local official.
(7) EMPLOYEES AND PERSONS PROTECTED.—This section protects employees and persons who disclose information on their own initiative in a written and signed complaint; who are requested to participate in an investigation, hearing, or other inquiry conducted by any agency or federal government entity; who refuse to participate in any adverse action prohibited by this section; or who initiate a complaint through the whistle-blower’s hotline or the hotline of the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Department of Legal Affairs; or employees who file any written complaint to their supervisory officials or employees who submit a complaint to the Chief Inspector General in the Executive Office of the Governor, to the employee designated as agency inspector general under s. 112.3189(1), or to the Florida Commission on Human Relations. The provisions of this section may not be used by a person while he or she is under the care, custody, or control of the state correctional system or, after release from the care, custody, or control of the state correctional system, with respect to circumstances that occurred during any period of incarceration. No remedy or other protection under ss. 112.3187-112.31895 applies to any person who has committed or intentionally participated in committing the violation or suspected violation for which protection under ss. 112.3187-112.31895 is being sought.
(8) REMEDIES.—
(a) Any employee of or applicant for employment with any state agency, as the term “state agency” is defined in s. 216.011, who is discharged, disciplined, or subjected to other adverse personnel action, or denied employment, because he or she engaged in an activity protected by this section may file a complaint, which complaint must be made in accordance with s. 112.31895. Upon receipt of notice from the Florida Commission on Human Relations of termination of the investigation, the complainant may elect to pursue the administrative remedy available under s. 112.31895 or bring a civil action within 180 days after receipt of the notice.
(b) Within 60 days after the action prohibited by this section, any local public employee protected by this section may file a complaint with the appropriate local governmental authority, if that authority has established by ordinance an administrative procedure for handling such complaints or has contracted with the Division of Administrative Hearings under s. 120.65 to conduct hearings under this section. The administrative procedure created by ordinance must provide for the complaint to be heard by a panel of impartial persons appointed by the appropriate local governmental authority. Upon hearing the complaint, the panel must make findings of fact and conclusions of law for a final decision by the local governmental authority. Within 180 days after entry of a final decision by the local governmental authority, the public employee who filed the complaint may bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. If the local governmental authority has not established an administrative procedure by ordinance or contract, a local public employee may, within 180 days after the action prohibited by this section, bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction. For the purpose of this paragraph, the term “local governmental authority” includes any regional, county, or municipal entity, special district, community college district, or school district or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing.
(c) Any other person protected by this section may, after exhausting all available contractual or administrative remedies, bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction within 180 days after the action prohibited by this section.
(9) RELIEF.—In any action brought under this section, the relief must include the following:
(a) Reinstatement of the employee to the same position held before the adverse action was commenced, or to an equivalent position or reasonable front pay as alternative relief.
(b) Reinstatement of the employee’s full fringe benefits and seniority rights, as appropriate.
(c) Compensation, if appropriate, for lost wages, benefits, or other lost remuneration caused by the adverse action.
(d) Payment of reasonable costs, including attorney’s fees, to a substantially prevailing employee, or to the prevailing employer if the employee filed a frivolous action in bad faith.
(e) Issuance of an injunction, if appropriate, by a court of competent jurisdiction.
(f) Temporary reinstatement to the employee’s former position or to an equivalent position, pending the final outcome on the complaint, if an employee complains of being discharged in retaliation for a protected disclosure and if a court of competent jurisdiction or the Florida Commission on Human Relations, as applicable under s. 112.31895, determines that the disclosure was not made in bad faith or for a wrongful purpose or occurred after an agency’s initiation of a personnel action against the employee which includes documentation of the employee’s violation of a disciplinary standard or performance deficiency. This paragraph does not apply to an employee of a municipality.

(11) EXISTING RIGHTS.—Sections 112.3187-112.31895 do not diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies of an employee under any other law or rule or under any collective bargaining agreement or employment contract; however, the election of remedies in s. 447.401 also applies to whistle-blower actions.

[Unregistered]

Does anyone know where the great Max has gone to it appears that with all this Capt. Ortiz side show occurring the Great Max has gone underground. Has anyone else noticed that someone is feeding our Commissioners specific intel or dirt on key topics which are being used against our Chief and others from our department.

Could this secert double agent be The Great Max or is this just a coincidence?

Hey buddy if your concern about rhe intel that max is suppling, then it got be on point. Everyone is now sees why max got screwed over by the Ortiz Mofia gang.

You got to commend max. He is like Sammy the bull. He sure didn’t lay down and let Ortiz, Pulido, Lugo, detesphan steam roll him. Unlike the pride boys he stood up to all of them and brought the pain.

Max your an asshole but your fair and consistent. The silent majority is supporting you max.

Max “the bull” valdes . And he doesn’t need witness protection.

[Unregistered]

That a felony boys. That means subpoena and search warrants could be issued.

Like your attorney should be telling you both you have the right to remain silent anything you say or do could held against you in a court of law.

Don’t make something out of nothing, a simple speculation or observation inquiring on a previous rumor is not “witness tampering” but who knows what you guys claim.

[Unregistered]

Witness protection?

[Unregistered]

Good good inquiring mind used a vpn from home. Or else you know

[Unregistered]

Hey buddy if your concern about rhe intel that max is suppling, then it got be on point. Everyone is now sees why max got screwed over by the Ortiz Mofia gang.

You got to commend max. He is like Sammy the bull. He sure didn’t lay down and let Ortiz, Pulido, Lugo, detesphan steam roll him. Unlike the pride boys he stood up to all of them and brought the pain.

Max your an asshole but your fair and consistent. The silent majority is supporting you max.

Max “the bull” valdes . And he doesn’t need witness protection.

The silent majority is NOT supporting this conniving, lying, slithering snake who happens to be a LEO. MadMax is a shameful human excrement. Keep your support of this animal to yourself.