The truth about Mark D Barker - Page 2
Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 239
 
  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Somebody in an earlier thread was singing the praises of Mark D Barker. In the interest of truthfulness I felt it necessary to start this thread with the truth.

    Mark D Barker was the "Chief" of a Podunk department that had maybe 20 officers. Big Whoop.

    After he "retired" he started his second career as a professional blogger. Big Prestige there. One of his first targets was Heather Post. That was until Chitwood told him to lay off Heather...which he has since done.

    He then tried to become a school guardian. He even whined and cried to Chitwood in trying to become a school guardian. Both Chitwood and Mark D Barker were told to go pound by the School District. Barker was told, in effect, he was too inept and incompetent to be a school guardian. That made the School District his newest target. And showed the real clout of the imbecilic Chitwood.

    Hope this helps.
    You obviously are not in law enforcement. No respectable law enforcement professional would call another agency “Podunk.” It’s apparently clear it’s the viewpoint again of a lowlife wife beating creepy criminal sexual pedofile perverted style stalker; a loser liable hermaphrodite halfwit grasping for air COPD disgusting lazy blogger slob; a trailer traitor trash real estate brochure salesman scumbag of the quarter; or the disgraced and disparaged excessive force ex-deputy dog dummy dimwit.

    Unlike the trash listed above, Mark has a distinguished career in law enforcement. His penmanship is also quadruple superior than the yellow stained “journalist.” Mark’s personal and professional background is impeccable; unlike the creepy criminal sex offender sympathizer from Dirtona. He can also re-enter the law enforcement profession at his discretion due to his honorable service as a police officer; contradictory, not so much for the treasonous traitors of the badge Jenkins and Szabo. Meanwhile, fake profile the imbecile Rusty approves of this message while licking Chipmunk’s boots. It’s too bad there is no good quality people in opposition of Barker and Chitwood on this page.

    Hope this helps.

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    You obviously are not in law enforcement. No respectable law enforcement professional would call another agency “Podunk.” It’s apparently clear it’s the viewpoint again of a lowlife wife beating creepy criminal sexual pedofile perverted style stalker; a loser liable hermaphrodite halfwit grasping for air COPD disgusting lazy blogger slob; a trailer traitor trash real estate brochure salesman scumbag of the quarter; or the disgraced and disparaged excessive force ex-deputy dog dummy dimwit.

    Unlike the trash listed above, Mark has a distinguished career in law enforcement. His penmanship is also quadruple superior than the yellow stained “journalist.” Mark’s personal and professional background is impeccable; unlike the creepy criminal sex offender sympathizer from Dirtona. He can also re-enter the law enforcement profession at his discretion due to his honorable service as a police officer; contradictory, not so much for the treasonous traitors of the badge Jenkins and Szabo. Meanwhile, fake profile the imbecile Rusty approves of this message while licking Chipmunk’s boots. It’s too bad there is no good quality people in opposition of Barker and Chitwood on this page.

    Hope this helps.
    Barker is not good enough to be a guardian but he is overqualified for Chitwoods VCSO, okay got it. Training and experience are 2 different animals. Doesn't Barker have an ethics complaint that his panties are wadded about.
    There are no supporters of Chitwood who bring any educated defense to the discussion BTW. Just insults but at the end of the day, that is all you have to offer without substance. Public records are a MF'er. Chitwood ain't winning anymore because the public is beginning to see the real person he is. He can only win by manipulation, and everyone knows that isn't due to hard work and effort. Even after a successful election, he will still be known to be a born loser. You cannot claim a win when there is no challengers and it took nearly a year to get a few thousand petitions signed. I know, the truth hurts doesn't it.

    Hope this helps as well

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    While I respect Barker's law enforcement career and his many years of public service, as a blogger, he's s bloviating idiot and a total Chitwood lap dog. That's his right, and I respect that....I just don't respect his angry, alcohol-fueled, anti-government rants and personal attacks. He's irrelevant in my book.

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Barker is not good enough to be a guardian but he is overqualified for Chitwoods VCSO, okay got it. Training and experience are 2 different animals. Doesn't Barker have an ethics complaint that his panties are wadded about.
    There are no supporters of Chitwood who bring any educated defense to the discussion BTW. Just insults but at the end of the day, that is all you have to offer without substance. Public records are a MF'er. Chitwood ain't winning anymore because the public is beginning to see the real person he is. He can only win by manipulation, and everyone knows that isn't due to hard work and effort. Even after a successful election, he will still be known to be a born loser. You cannot claim a win when there is no challengers and it took nearly a year to get a few thousand petitions signed. I know, the truth hurts doesn't it.

    Hope this helps as well
    It’s just hilarious and HYPOCRITICAL listening to the “born losers” on this page criticize a former distinguished law enforcement officer. Yet, the cheerleaders on this page objectively coddled two disgraced treasonous traitors of the badge as their hometown hero’s. An ethics complaint that Marc was cleared from, however, still used as ammunition to forward yours and the other fraudsters on this page trash talking agenda. Do you know who else wouldn’t make a school guardian, all of you anti-Chitwood rats on this page. You all have major deficiencies in your backgrounds. Heck, Alvin can even carry a firearm because he’s so mentally unstable and wacky determined by a judge. His criminal record would disqualify him anyways (duh). Mark might have not been accepted into the guardian program, however, he’s still meets qualifications of the job; unlike the sore opposition lack luster limp wrist losers. Isn’t that hypocritical again?

    Sounds like it to me you and others are upset Mark speaks the bold truth and you are butthurt aimlessly bash the Sheriff off pure immature embarrassing baseless emotions. The “truth” does apparently “hurt” listening the goons on this page bellyaching over his brash style of Mark’s real award winning style of journalism. It’s apparently crystal clear Mark is more with ethically sound and professional qualified than all of you losers combined on this page. He also carries more journalistic accuracy and integrity than a supposed the real yellow stained “journalist” with one stroke of his typewriter. The only “born losers” on this page are the four “integrity issues” idiots that have no chance of a quality lifestyle from their bad choices. It’s quite abundantly clear Mark is being brought up to deflect from the consistently failing efforts to bring the Sheriff down out of anger. It’s also obvious Barker’s View has 3 times the followers even with Headline Hospital Heifer Hermaphrodite and Always Been Creepin’ (ABC) combined. That’s pretty sad a recreational blogger surpasses the so called “serious” pages with a purpose. All you anti-Chitwood villains are for sure sad individuals with sad lifestyle aching for attention.

    Hope that help.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It’s just hilarious and HYPOCRITICAL listening to the “born losers” on this page criticize a former distinguished law enforcement officer. Yet, the cheerleaders on this page objectively coddled two disgraced treasonous traitors of the badge as their hometown hero’s. An ethics complaint that Marc was cleared from, however, still used as ammunition to forward yours and the other fraudsters on this page trash talking agenda. Do you know who else wouldn’t make a school guardian, all of you anti-Chitwood rats on this page. You all have major deficiencies in your backgrounds. Heck, Alvin can even carry a firearm because he’s so mentally unstable and wacky determined by a judge. His criminal record would disqualify him anyways (duh). Mark might have not been accepted into the guardian program, however, he’s still meets qualifications of the job; unlike the sore opposition lack luster limp wrist losers. Isn’t that hypocritical again?

    Sounds like it to me you and others are upset Mark speaks the bold truth and you are butthurt aimlessly bash the Sheriff off pure immature embarrassing baseless emotions. The “truth” does apparently “hurt” listening the goons on this page bellyaching over his brash style of Mark’s real award winning style of journalism. It’s apparently crystal clear Mark is more with ethically sound and professional qualified than all of you losers combined on this page. He also carries more journalistic accuracy and integrity than a supposed the real yellow stained “journalist” with one stroke of his typewriter. The only “born losers” on this page are the four “integrity issues” idiots that have no chance of a quality lifestyle from their bad choices. It’s quite abundantly clear Mark is being brought up to deflect from the consistently failing efforts to bring the Sheriff down out of anger. It’s also obvious Barker’s View has 3 times the followers even with Headline Hospital Heifer Hermaphrodite and Always Been Creepin’ (ABC) combined. That’s pretty sad a recreational blogger surpasses the so called “serious” pages with a purpose. All you anti-Chitwood villains are for sure sad individuals with sad lifestyle aching for attention.

    Hope that help.
    Sorry you got called out mark. Just like chity it looks like people know your true colors.

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Sorry you got called out mark. Just like chity it looks like people know your true colors.
    Looks like you and your ladies were actually called out on the carpet. The arguments against Mark are weak and laughable at best. You all sound pretty desperate when you have to bring Mark up!m here. Your treasonous and traitorous “true colors” show in your backgrounds each and everyday of your lives. How does it feel not to be qualified shady yourself?

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Looks like you and your ladies were actually called out on the carpet. The arguments against Mark are weak and laughable at best. You all sound pretty desperate when you have to bring Mark up!m here. Your treasonous and traitorous “true colors” show in your backgrounds each and everyday of your lives. How does it feel not to be qualified shady yourself?
    The fact of the matter is somebody on the Rodriguez thread brought out Barker. They were signing his praises. Maybe it was Barker himself. Maybe it was Chity or Kyle or Heather. Who knows?

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The fact of the matter is somebody on the Rodriguez thread brought out Barker. They were signing his praises. Maybe it was Barker himself. Maybe it was Chity or Kyle or Heather. Who knows?
    It’s apparently clear the purpose of this board. Anyone who disagrees with the petty juvenile rants gets chastised. It’s okay to bash Barker, Chitwood..... However, God forbid someone complements a decorated law enforcement professional who has a different viewpoint. Let’s create another thread and talk it up like it’s another scandal. It’s too bad Mark Barker has more class than all you hillbilly morons who take issue with him on this page. When will you become a law enforcement professional? Oh wait, like NEVER!

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It’s apparently clear the purpose of this board. Anyone who disagrees with the petty juvenile rants gets chastised. It’s okay to bash Barker, Chitwood..... However, God forbid someone complements a decorated law enforcement professional who has a different viewpoint. Let’s create another thread and talk it up like it’s another scandal. It’s too bad Mark Barker has more class than all you hillbilly morons who take issue with him on this page. When will you become a law enforcement professional? Oh wait, like NEVER!
    HYpoCrITe......

  10. #20
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    HYpoCrITe......
    The hypocrisy is the yellow stained “journalist” who violates his journalistic ethical standards with his over inflated ego driven sensational style story of fairytales. The new “media” “news” mutt who can’t post a decent graphic after slipping his way through graduate school. Almost as amateurish as his poor sentence structure and extensive grammatical errors. Hank’s career is failing faster than his poor health from his acute laziness. The “honest” criminal who will never amount to anything worthwhile to be hypocritical enough to make a difference. They hypocritical “hero” hype of the treasonous traitors of the badge. All jealous Mark Barker is a more successful blogger than a local ”journalist” and a legendary icon in the criminal justice field; unlike the trash that plagues this board. None will ever surpass and be a great leader like our great Sheriff Chitwood. That’s leadership and coverage you can count on from two genuine professionals in law enforcement.

Page 2 of 24 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •