Serious question about PRT

[Unregistered]

I don’t even know what to say about your thoughts on ‘the only time these subjects shot’. It’s not a video game. You are delusional with your Hollywood expectations that bad guys can fire a gun and then call a time-out. Or that the police have an obligation to show restraint. They have an obligation to stop the threat. In fact every since the school shootings this is EXACTLY how they have been trained.

The only delusional one here is your PRT dumbass. You guys haven’t been trained to identify the difference between active shooter vs hostage. This is the result.

[Unregistered]

Kill the threat and think later ... 5 innocent bystanders died, OK, the subjects could have killed 10 if we didn’t act.... you kill the subject and 20 bystanders ??? It’s ok... the subjects could have killed 50 if we didn’t act ... that’s what I hear as the logic behind PRT actions ... add a dumb voice to it

[Unregistered]

Kill the threat and think later ... 5 innocent bystanders died, OK, the subjects could have killed 10 if we didn’t act.... you kill the subject and 20 bystanders ??? It’s ok... the subjects could have killed 50 if we didn’t act ... that’s what I hear as the logic behind PRT actions ... add a dumb voice to it

But none of those numbers happened so your hypothetical doesn’t hold water...it was 2, and it’s absolutely tragic....but maybe because of the police it wasn’t 10-20-30 more. Blame the subjects not the police. Peace.

[Unregistered]

The only delusional one here is your PRT dumbass. You guys haven’t been trained to identify the difference between active shooter vs hostage. This is the result.

And you don’t know enough to know it can be both at the same time... Peace.

[Unregistered]

And how many shots did the subject fire at police in that incident?

Non because those officers understood it was a hostage incident and followed the truck from a distance then made sure not to approach when it reached a dead end. Instead they made a perimeter and waited for SRT. Whenever the mail truck got into a traffic jam those officers understood what was at stake and backed off to not make the subject feel desperate with no way out. These PRT Chuck Norris wannabes thought they were playing Call of Duty instead of dealing with a hostage incident.

[Unregistered]

Non because those officers understood it was a hostage incident and followed the truck from a distance then made sure not to approach when it reached a dead end. Instead they made a perimeter and waited for SRT. Whenever the mail truck got into a traffic jam those officers understood what was at stake and backed off to not make the subject feel desperate with no way out. These PRT Chuck Norris wannabes thought they were playing Call of Duty instead of dealing with a hostage incident.

Your argument forgets that the subject already fired rounds at the scene and during the pursuit. It was always an active shooter.

[Unregistered]

Your argument forgets that the subject already fired rounds at the scene and during the pursuit. It was always an active shooter.

And you forget the definition of active shooter, look it up!

[Unregistered]

Your argument forgets that the subject already fired rounds at the scene and during the pursuit. It was always an active shooter.

Because the cowboy squad pulled up right next to the truck’s passenger compartment That didn’t happen in the USPS incident.

[Unregistered]

Because the cowboy squad pulled up right next to the truck’s passenger compartment That didn’t happen in the USPS incident.

Who were the idiots from PRT driving that car?

[Unregistered]

Who were the idiots from PRT driving that car?

PRT sets the standard on tactics and professionalism. Peace.