Mentor Deputy - Page 4
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 68
 

Thread: Mentor Deputy

  1. #31
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Why make something easy, sensible and efficient when you can drag it out and make it a huge wasteful bureaucratic months long political process?

  2. #32
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Why make something easy, sensible and efficient when you can drag it out and make it a huge wasteful bureaucratic months long political process?
    Job security for the office snowflakes and Bob's stooges.

  3. #33
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Job security for the office snowflakes and Bob's stooges.


    Sprinkle some promotions and various awards for administrative herosim and that's a good enough incentive to turn a twenty minute process into a 9 month ordeal involving numerous committees, memos, task forces, interviews and so on. The only thing I see being mentored is a few egos.

  4. #34
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Don’t kid yourself, neither the Sheriff nor the Command Staff know everyone that works for them. This is not a small agency. You may know if a deputy is a douche bag or not, but they don’t. So maybe before we have deputies giving official guidance to brand new deputies there should be some kind of vetting process. It makes sense. If you have that shitty of an attitude about them don’t sign up. It’s that easy. You know you don’t have to be an asshole about this place 100% of the time, give someone else a chance once in a while.

  5. #35
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Do you think many people will want to do it

  6. #36
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Even less than FTO.

  7. #37
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Don’t kid yourself, neither the Sheriff nor the Command Staff know everyone that works for them. This is not a small agency. You may know if a deputy is a douche bag or not, but they don’t. So maybe before we have deputies giving official guidance to brand new deputies there should be some kind of vetting process. It makes sense. If you have that shitty of an attitude about them don’t sign up. It’s that easy. You know you don’t have to be an asshole about this place 100% of the time, give someone else a chance once in a while.
    Come on this is LEO Affairs the rag sheet for the complainers. Why would anyone expect anything positive ever to posted on this site? This is for the moaners and whiners who are the minority that try to take everyone down with them.

  8. #38
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Yes I agree but it's still the truth, even less than FTO.

  9. #39
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Come on this is LEO Affairs the rag sheet for the complainers. Why would anyone expect anything positive ever to posted on this site? This is for the moaners and whiners who are the minority that try to take everyone down with them.
    Because if you post complaints or criticisms on "Axe the Executive Staff" you can get black-listed, disciplined or fired.

    If they or Bob do not like it they can always retire. With all those years of double-dipping and generous pensions they should have enough.

  10. #40
    Unregistered
    Guest
    It got canceled because not even 15 Deputies applied. That's a real shocker since the application process deters people from applying. If it were a general application, or just a memo, I'm sure people would apply, but it always has to be some big show.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •