On this forum there has been statements made that the pregnancy was fake. The argument fails to consider the exchange of text messages between Marceno and the victim reporting the crime. Within the context of the text messages there is clear evidence that the female victim is with child and this is acknowledge and accepted by Marceno. The argument between the two parties (the victim reporting the crime and Marceno) is how to proceed with the issue of the pregnancy. For anyone within LCSO or outside LCSO to argue any differently only brings additional shame. Both parties acknowledge and accept that the child is the results of actions by both (Marceno and the victim reporting the crime). If Marceno cared more about people than the animals he would step forward and at least protect the female victim from these types of statements and accept his role in this issue. Why caused additional harm to the female victim?

Fake is defined by Merriam-Webster as a noun, “a worthless imitation passed off as genuine” and as a verb, “to alter, manipulate, or treat so as to give a spuriously genuine appearance” such as an example, “faked the lab results”. Compare Marceno’s actions that have been reported on the news and web to the definition and perhaps you may come to a different conclusion. Compare Marceno’s applications and work history and again you might come to a different conclusion.