Results 31 to 40 of 68
-
10-18-2019, 11:25 PM #31UnregisteredGuest
Chronically mentally ill people do not "cause" tragedy. It's the failure of of our country not to have laws and systems in place to intitutionalize those who pose a threat to themselves and others. You can thank the liberals for that. They de-institutionalized thousands finding insitutionalization to be a violation of "rights" Nikolas Cruz was just one individual who had he been age 18 in 1960 would have been committed for life to a state mental institution years before MSD. He is no more to blame than a 90 year old woman with dementia who shoots someone. There are no other options than life or the death sentence for Cruz based on the law, and yes, he needs to be removed from society forever. However, only very sick and or evil people kill in this fashion. Their brains, their reasoning is abnormal. THAT is where the focus needs to be. Police and schools need to refuse to accept the burden of managing individuals with severe and debilitating mental illness. If there's one issue that should cause outrage, it's not a whining and offended Sheriff, it's WTF are we going to do with these psychotic people who walk among us to prevent this from happening again. Cruz is one of many.
-
10-19-2019, 12:58 AM #32UnregisteredGuest
What are we going to do with crazy people who wander among us? Neutralize them with extreme prejudice, the instant that they present an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm? Arm and protect yourself.
What has happened, over the last six decades, is that the right of honest, law abiding people, to effectively use force to defend themselves, has been curtailed to the point where it no longer exists in several locales. People go through life depending upon others to protect them and their family. Then when no one protects them, they sit and whine about it.
As a society, we have decided that people who commit criminal acts, can learn and rehabilitate. Depending upon what crime is committed, the age of the person committing the crime, his actual history of committing crimes and several other factors, a person may turn his life around and become a contributing member of society. But, there is no way to determine who will or won't become that productive member of society. It is all a crap shoot. Still, only the most heinous criminals ever serve a life sentence or are executed. This means that almost all criminals are going to be released to commit the same, or worse, crimes in the future.
So, to avoid becoming a criminal statistic, people, and institutions, have to provide for their own immediate defense. In Florida, approximately half the population can legally carry a firearm in public. 20% of those people [10% of the total population] have procured the appropriate licensing to carry in public. Only half of those [5% of the total population] or less, actually carry a firearm on a regular basis.
-
10-19-2019, 01:29 AM #33UnregisteredGuest
As far as the concerns about setting a precedent that could work both ways....
I'm a Republican. If at some point in the future a Republican Sheriff self identifies as an amazing leader, and does not have the decency to INITIATE a plan to step aside from a district of devastated people following a tragedy, I'd have no problem with him being removed by a democratic governor, if only to fulfill a political promise. Even dirtbag Abby F, the school board witch, stepped down to give a school board candidate with a dead child a chance. It's unfathomable that Israel, based on Peterson's and Millers inaction, has not approached the city with humility, as a man. Instead, he'll wait to be served with a 90 day notice. Classless coward.
-
10-19-2019, 02:16 AM #34UnregisteredGuest
Would you give it up. You make it sound like Israel would be holding the City of Parkland hostage. Not true. The City can cancel the contract with the BSO at any time that it wants. So, all YOU have to do is convince your leaders and the rest of the residents of Parkland to do just that. Now you advocate for allowing a handful of people, who lose loved ones to criminal action, to be given unilateral authority over everyone else in the city. Israel had NO direct responsibility for the shooting, that was the school board. Yet, I do not see you demanding that school security be increased beyond what was in place at MSDHS on the day of the shooting. Do you really care about the students in our schools, or is this just a political game to you?
-
10-19-2019, 02:20 AM #35UnregisteredGuest
Israel wont get his job back. The garbage bucket doesn't deserve to be called a leo for his actions.
-
10-19-2019, 03:43 PM #36UnregisteredGuest
Great points but you forgot to consider one major factor. Personally I think this factor is the only one Republican senators will consider when deciding how they will vote. That factor is how much they believe their chance of being reelected change based on their vote. If a particular senator believes that he will be reelected even if he votes to not reinstate Israel; there is almost no chance they he vote to reinstate Israel.
Lets be honest for a second, as much as you may want to put your faith into the morality of Republican officials; they have none. They are no different then any politician. They will do what it takes to get ahead and morals be damned. So if them not reinstating Israel won't hurt their chance of getting reelected, what motive do they have to do so besides "its the right thing to do?" The answer is none. Strategically speaking, it would be an idiotic move for any Republican Senator to vote to reinstate if they believe the above.
However, if they believe that not reinstating Israel will significantly affect their chances of being reelected and/or greatly hinder their political aspirations; they will vote to reinstate. I have no negative feelings towards Israel or Tony so I can look at this objectively. I also do not think that there is enough evidence to justify removing Israel from office. But the average US voter is extremely ignorant regarding anything but a few major issues in politics. As much as some people in this website may believe that many voters outside of the tri county area are watching this case holding their breathe; I can tell you that they are not. Chances are they don't even know this case exists. Therefore, they will not care how the Senate votes and they will continue to elect Republican Senators if they are a "red" district in FL. I think most Senators are smart enough to realize this so I think they will vote to uphold the suspension because that is the "smart move" strategically.
-
10-20-2019, 04:48 AM #37UnregisteredGuest
-
10-20-2019, 08:19 AM #38UnregisteredGuest
-
10-20-2019, 09:49 AM #39UnregisteredGuest
If you're so passionate in your beliefs, go to the Walmart at 6001 Coral Ridge drive today around 9:30 or 10 o'clock (am) and try to prove your point. Good luck. You're certainly gonna need it...Along with maybe football gear and groin protection.
You're probably too chicken $hit to show up though.
-
10-20-2019, 01:59 PM #40UnregisteredGuest
Bookmarks