Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
09-10-2019, 01:00 PM #1UnregisteredGuest
Michael drejka case proves cowardice of sheriff
How is it that the sheriff makes the call not to arrest Michael Drejka for defending himself against Markeis McGlockton after he shoves Drejka to the ground so hard he bounces and nearly breaks his arm and shoulder? So what if the court and Trevena couldn't force Bob to testify. You have free will, sheriff, don't you? This man is going to prison and may die or be killed or even take his own life all because he defended his own life. Clearwater police even protected Drejka 24/7 after! This case was not about a handicapped parking space which by the way is still illegally marked. It's about a man hopped up on Ecstasy who felt entitled to knock down and beat up a man who was talking even arguing with his baby mama. Read the jurors interviews with the press. They didn't even understand the law or the judge instructions. When Drejka stands there and gets sentenced Florida, Sheriff Robert A. Gualtieri and the fatcats at the state will have finally put the nail in their own political coffin. Cowards every last one of you.
-
09-10-2019, 02:34 PM #2UnregisteredGuest
That dude is autistic. It's the reason he comes off with no emotion. I am talking about Mr. Drejka, not BG. He took some anti-depressant I think. But don't let the autistic community know he was found guilty and might spend 30 years in prison for defending his life. They will freak. Did I read on here that the judge in the case actually was the judge in six of Mr. McGlockton's cases too? How is that not ...effed up?
-
09-10-2019, 04:16 PM #3UnregisteredGuest
-
09-10-2019, 05:54 PM #4UnregisteredGuest
How dumb are you? Do you have a don’t tread on me tattoo on your arm and a bunker in your home? The day that it is legal to shoot and kill someone for shoving you is the day that The Annual Purge will begin for real. Drejka can yell at anyone he wants for anything he wants to a degree. But there are consequences to actions. And when a husband or boyfriend walks out and sees a man accosting his spouse or girlfriend things happen. Drejka was never bear. I’ve watched that video over and over. He shoved him, nothing more. And that ***** Drejka pulled out a gun and shot and killed an unarmed man because he pushed him. HE PUSHED HIM!!! Drejka is a ***** and a coward hiding behind a gun because he couldn’t handle being shoved. When you step into other people’s business you can expect conflict. Especially when you started it. And if you don’t think it’s about the parking space why do you care that it still isn’t “legal”? I understood why an arrest wasn’t made. Apparently you can’t think for yourself. The State filed the charge. The jury found him guilty. Case closed. If anyone dropped the ball it would Trevena. And Drejka can handle that through the bar. Drejka chose to forgo the Stand Your Ground Motion. Drejka chose to take it to trial. The only smoking gun here was Drejka’s. And he’s going to prison for it. “He almost broke his bones”. Hahahahaha. So I guess whenever I get hit or shoved I can shoot them because “they almost broke my bones”. You are so stupid. Idiot.
-
09-10-2019, 09:20 PM #5UnregisteredGuest
The Law
Chapter 776
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
View Entire Chapter
776.012 Use or threatened use of force in defense of person.—
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
---END---
You watched that video over and over? Clue, Drejka wasn't watching any video when he decided to defend his own life. He wasn't observing the scene as you and countless others boast of so ignorantly. He was pushing himself up with one arm, cause the impact had probably fractured a few bones, after being bounced off the scorching hot asphalt by a younger, heavier, more muscular man with a ton of MDMA in his system. That's when he saw McGlockton, his girlfriend who had already warned him "her man" was gonna "f you up", and Castelli, who actually DID RETREAT when he saw the gun. Compare Castelli's retreat to whatever McGlockton did with his feet. Oh, and did you catch the CLAP McGlockton did after he blindsided Drejka? Did you? See, Drejka decided not to die that day. McGlockton, who you must think is so illiterate he can't even use words, made decisions that led to his death. FREE MICHAEL DREJKA.
-
09-11-2019, 12:37 AM #6UnregisteredGuest
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
776.012 Use or threatened use of force in defense of person.—
(1) A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
History.—s. 13, ch. 74-383; s. 1188, ch. 97-102; s. 2, ch. 2005-27; s. 3, ch. 2014-195.
-
09-11-2019, 02:31 AM #7UnregisteredGuest
-
09-11-2019, 04:58 AM #8UnregisteredGuest
Bullcrap. Drejke "provoked" McGlockton by verbally assaulting his family in a threatening manner. Anyone who provokes someone else so badly that they use force against them DO NOT GET A SYG DEFENSE unless they retreat and are re-attacked. You don't get to start crap with a man's family and shoot him dead if he pushes you away from his family. Nobody wants to hear your BS. We get it. You want black people killed. So did Drejeke. Now go back to your KKK meeting.
776.041 Use or threatened use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is NOT AVAILABLE to a person who:
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) INITIALLY PROVOKES THE USE OF OR THREATENED USE OF FORCE AGAINST HIMSELF or herself, unless:
(a) Such force or threat of force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm AND THAT HE OR SHE HAS EXHAUSTED **EVERY** REASONABLE MEANS TO ESCAPE SUCH DANGER other than the use or threatened use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use or threatened use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use or threatened use of force.
-
09-11-2019, 07:54 AM #9UnregisteredGuest
-
09-11-2019, 12:48 PM #10UnregisteredGuest
Bob considered a push an imminent threat of death. That's why he refused to arrest. But Bob hates black people too. Remember that time he went 10-50 on that black woman for getting in front of him at a red light and tried to pull her out of the car by her hair ripping most of it off? He went home all excited after that one.
Bookmarks