So what did you guys do to that man on the bike?

[Unregistered]

This thread was obviously created by a social justice warrior looking to incite fault when there might be none at all. Go away SJW, shoo...shoo! Put some of that energy into finding your next pumpkin spice latte...or perhaps a shower...or a job? A job making pumpkin spice lattes? Isn't that where your kind gather to make up propaganda without any factual merit or basis...the homes of pumpkin spice lattes? I said SHOO!

[Unregistered]

Here's one possible scenario:

He was tased and fell of his bike and smashed his head on the pavement because he wasn't wearing a helmet.

When you use the taser you have to be cognizant of the conditions which might cause injury when the subject is incapacitated, such as a fall from a bike on a hard surface with no helmet.

[Unregistered]

Or he shouldn't have run from police.

[MOD 1]

https://www.tampabay.com/news/pinell...at-went-wrong/

The thread got pulled from the first time I posted it. Not sure why a Tampa Bay Article with a question "what happened" is grounds for removing a thread though.

It wasn't the link nor the asking what happened that got it deleted. It was your outrageous inflammatory questions that showed your Anti-LEO bias that got the thread deleted. Your questions were nothing but inflammatory accusations against the deputies involved without any merit what so ever.

That's why it was deleted.

Mod 1

[Unregistered]

It wasn't the link nor the asking what happened that got it deleted. It was your outrageous inflammatory questions that showed your Anti-LEO bias that got the thread deleted. Your questions were nothing but inflammatory accusations against the deputies involved without any merit what so ever.

That's why it was deleted.

Mod 1

Thanks Mod1. This person obviously has anti cop agenda.

[Unregistered]

Here's one possible scenario:

He was tased and fell of his bike and smashed his head on the pavement because he wasn't wearing a helmet.

When you use the taser you have to be cognizant of the conditions which might cause injury when the subject is incapacitated, such as a fall from a bike on a hard surface with no helmet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/17/u...k-bessner.html

That's manslaughter too.

[Unregistered]

It wasn't the link nor the asking what happened that got it deleted. It was your outrageous inflammatory questions that showed your Anti-LEO bias that got the thread deleted. Your questions were nothing but inflammatory accusations against the deputies involved without any merit what so ever.

That's why it was deleted.

Mod 1

Asking a question is not in and of itself inflammatory. One can simply answer "no". Can you please give an example of an inflammatory or anti-LEO question?

[Unregistered]

Thanks Mod1. This person obviously has anti cop agenda.

Why is it that if someone does not like cops killing unarmed people that they must have an "anti-LEO agenda"? The TBT wrote an entire article asking "what happened" and the fact that Gualtieri is hiding what happened from everybody causes concern of a cover up. Gualtieri usually only does that if he is trying to cover for some wrongdoing.

[Unregistered]

The guy was running not on bike or ATV. So your argument is invalid. What time is the next cop block meeting

[Unregistered]

It’s your form Mod, you can delete whatever you want for whatever arbitrary reason. However, I saw the thread and there was nothing inflammatory, especially compared to other postings on this board. Hell, there’s a huge thread on a neighboring agency’s board accusing a high ranking employee, by name, of a DUI cover up, with no evidence presented. Where’s the consistency?

Asking what happened when someone lost their life during an encounter with law enforcement, when little information has been released compared to similar events involving this agency, is not anti-LEO in of itself. Suppressing a discussion on such a topic comes off as obstructive, agenda-based, and highly suspicious at best. If there was information that could clear the deputies involved, there would already have been a press conference.