Please explain - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
 

Thread: Please explain

  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    [QUOTE=Unregistered;3028105]The department of EEO at the MRC is made up entity with no clear purpose. They love getting complaints to justify the hefty salaries because without them they have no job (lay off). But truth be told, they have admitted that most complaints they receive annually (average about 20 total for all city departments) are BS. The city doesn’t dismantle them because they don’t want another consent decrees like the civil rights decree of the 70s where Hispanic police applicants (not blacks) were discriminated against. The county could easily conduct these 20 investigations for the city. CIP is also a made up office with no purpose.

    Those are offices with no purpose apparently just because you say so. I wonder what are you so afraid of that you keep on trying to push the idea that a system with check and balances for discrimination AND harassment complaints it's not necessary in a government agency. Throwing out some biased and unverified numbers doesn't give any more credit to your statements.

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The department of EEO at the MRC is made up entity with no clear purpose. They love getting complaints to justify the hefty salaries because without them they have no job (lay off). But truth be told, they have admitted that most complaints they receive annually (average about 20 total for all city departments) are BS. The city doesn’t dismantle them because they don’t want another consent decrees like the civil rights decree of the 70s where Hispanic police applicants (not blacks) were discriminated against. The county could easily conduct these 20 investigations for the city. CIP is also a made up office with no purpose or power.
    Those are offices with no purpose apparently just because you say so. I wonder what are so afraid of that keep on trying to push the idea that a system with check and balances for discrimination AND harassment complaints is not necessary in a government agency. Throwing out some biased and unverified numbers doesn't give any more credit to your statements.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •