Kurt Hoffman files to run for Sheriff just before Knights notice today
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47
 

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Kurt Hoffman files to run for Sheriff just before Knights notice today

    Yes, the same Kurt Hoffman who has failed polygraphs, been dishonest, stole items from work, was involved in Pornography now wants to run the sheriff's office?

    Interesting too is the fact that his filing address (133 S Harbor Dr Venice, FL 34285) happens to be the same as who?? Eric "Prince of Dark Money" Robinson!!! Birds that flock together!!!!!




    By Greg Martin, Staff Writer, gmartin@sun-herald.com, 08/10/03

    Results of lie-detector tests shed differing opinions of Kurt Hoffman

    According to a report obtained by the examiner, Kurt Hoffman answered deceptively on a 1989 polygraph exam concerning stealing from two different employers, shoplifting and drinking habits.

    Hoffman was given his first polygraph exam by W.E. “Mac” McGinnis. During the first polygraph, Hoffman said that:

    * He has never stolen anything.
    * He has never participated in any undetected crimes.
    * He only consumes beer at home and only once a week.

    The polygraph examiner concluded in his written report, “The applicant [Kurt Hoffman] was deceptive.”

    Hoffman then took a second test a week later, administered by polygraph examiner Edward DuBois. However, before the second test began, Hoffman confessed to DuBois that, “I do have admissions to make,” DuBois wrote in his report. According to DuBois, Hoffman admitted that:

    * While working as a Reserve deputy, Hoffman took gas (twice) from the Charlotte County
    Sheriff’s Office for use in his personally owned car without paying for it.
    * Hoffman admitted taking herbicide without paying for it from another employer (the
    Charlotte County mosquito control department).
    * Stealing a boat as a teenager.
    * Shoplifting pornography.

    After the confessions, he took the second polygraph test and passed it. A former sheriff’s detective, Ken Dudding, said the first failed polygraph raises questions about Hoffman’s propensity to be dishonest. Dudding explained that Hoffman’s confessions in the second polygraph support that Hoffman was deception in the first polygraph. “Hoffman lied and he got caught. A leopard doesn’t change its spots. Hoffman is a liar,” Dudding said.

    Earn Varn explained that a polygraph measures changes to heart rate and other responses, which indicates whether a subject is experiencing an emotional response to questions.

    http://www.pdf-archive.com/2015/06/0...ffman-news.pdf

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Hoffman should worry

    That is the least of Hoffman's worries... Wait till the seriously bad stuff is released. There is no way Hoffman should be our Sheriff!! John Kost, I know you were considering a run, PLEASE, we need you!

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Let's hear it ! Who will be the first to write Kurt a check?

  4. #4
    Senior Member LEO Affairs Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    450

    Lightbulb Col. Kurt Hoffman files to run for Sarasota Sheriff

    Quote Originally Posted by ABC7 Staff
    Sheriff Knight says he is sure that his second in command, Colonel Kurt Hoffman, is the right man for his job. Just hours after Knight’s announcement, Hoffman filed to run for sheriff.
    Full story:
    https://www.mysuncoast.com/2019/06/0...g-re-election/
    Journalism can never be silent: that is its greatest virtue and its greatest fault. It must speak, and speak immediately, while the echoes of wonder, the claims of triumph and the signs of horror are still in the air.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Most of the third-floor that wants to keep their jobs or have one or two years left in there drop program will be the first to write checks.

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    we want all the dirt on this guy,we will do the job the press and tv and cops arent doing,we will expose his dirty needs to show he is not worthy and are system is corrupt to the core.
    is tom knight leaving because he will be charged with a 3rd degree felony for having a illegal list of gun owners witch he is illegally profiling? 790.335 states that youre agency can be fined 5 million dollars and every 1 illegally profiled can sue.tom gave me a underacted list of gun owners from the pawn list then illegally threatened me with arest for having it.ia investigated it and found records keeper guilty but not tom.

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Who has an investigative reporter

    Quote Originally Posted by Media View Post
    Look at his mortgage application for his property off east river rd. Signed by Hoffman and look at his wife’s signature. Now go into Charlotte county clerk of court and look at his wife’s signature again. Not even close. So we want a sheriff who is potentially forging signatures? You may say what’s the big deal? But if he does that without question of what the law requires what will he do at work. Oh by the way, he did this at work on company time which is a violation of sheriff’s department policy. There you have it. One word amoral.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Look at his mortgage application for his property off east river rd. Signed by Hoffman and look at his wife’s signature. Now go into Charlotte county clerk of court and look at his wife’s signature again. Not even close. So we want a sheriff who is potentially forging signatures? You may say what’s the big deal? But if he does that without question of what the law requires what will he do at work. Oh by the way, he did this at work on company time which is a violation of sheriff’s department policy. There you have it. One word amoral.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    1. There is no complainant. Without a complainant, it goes nowhere.
    2. Who will be willing to testify to corroborate your statement?
    If anyone inside the Sarasota Sheriff's Office steps forward to testify as a witness or as a complainant, then they will be politically destroyed by Tom Knight and Kurt Hoffman -- and their career will be over.

    No complainant = No crime

    No victim = No crime

    No witness = No evidence

    Nonetheless, it is abundantly clear that Hoffman will never be an elected sheriff. If he does not realize it yet, there will come a time when he will intuitively realize it. Hoffman is cooked, as in done. He was finished from the start.

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Look at his mortgage application for his property off east river rd. Signed by Hoffman and look at his wife’s signature. Now go into Charlotte county clerk of court and look at his wife’s signature again. Not even close. So we want a sheriff who is potentially forging signatures? You may say what’s the big deal? But if he does that without question of what the law requires what will he do at work. Oh by the way, he did this at work on company time which is a violation of sheriff’s department policy. There you have it. One word amoral.
    Can you please post links to those documents so that the signatures can be compared online?

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Look at his mortgage application for his property off east river rd. Signed by Hoffman and look at his wife’s signature. Now go into Charlotte county clerk of court and look at his wife’s signature again. Not even close. So we want a sheriff who is potentially forging signatures? You may say what’s the big deal? But if he does that without question of what the law requires what will he do at work. Oh by the way, he did this at work on company time which is a violation of sheriff’s department policy. There you have it.

    One word amoral.
    I had to look up the defintion of the word "amoral," but it sounds appropriate!

    • Amoral - lacking a moral sense; unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Can you please post links to those documents so that the signatures can be compared online?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrQyfjRdHB4

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •