School Security Guard Shoots At Responding Officers

[Unregistered]

Well, per policy you will by yourself enter into any active shooter location regardless of the situation. Not every active shooter is at a school involving kids. After Columbine, Leo"s bought into the idea because the policy at least afforded you two backups and a team concept covering each other while moving towards the shooter. This new policy by design, compels you to disregard any measures of safety or backup. Why? Seconds could save lives.....true enough. Leo leaders also dont want to have to defend the time it takes for three people to get on scene. For the first time in history, you are required by policy, to disregard any officer safety and rush in. We get killed doing this job everyday. Many officers have gone above and beyond and have sacrificed themselves trying to save people. A heroic choice they made. Hell, many might still go in by themselves because the old policy said you may. The vast majority of all Leo training is to teach you how to stay safer, and survive the day. Another words, your safety is paramount. This shift in your safety should scare the hell out of all of us. The public now expects you to sacrifice your self if need be, because your leaders dont have the balls to put your safety above all else.

Bob's General Counsel should read up on Warren v. The District of Columbia, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, and Castle Rock v. Gonzales. These decisions confirm that LEOs are under no obligation to protect citizens from criminals. Therefore the agency's policy is in violation of the US Supreme Court decisions. If Bob fires a deputy for failing to act, let's say in school shooting, the deputy can file a lawsuit based on these precedents and win.

[Unregistered]

Bob's General Counsel should read up on Warren v. The District of Columbia, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, and Castle Rock v. Gonzales. These decisions confirm that LEOs are under no obligation to protect citizens from criminals. Therefore the agency's policy is in violation of the US Supreme Court decisions. If Bob fires a deputy for failing to act, let's say in school shooting, the deputy can file a lawsuit based on these precedents and win.

Scott Peterson, you're both a coward and a moron. How's those lawsuits working out for you? Got your job back yet? No? Good. **** you.

[Unregistered]

Bob's General Counsel should read up on Warren v. The District of Columbia, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, and Castle Rock v. Gonzales. These decisions confirm that LEOs are under no obligation to protect citizens from criminals. Therefore the agency's policy is in violation of the US Supreme Court decisions. If Bob fires a deputy for failing to act, let's say in school shooting, the deputy can file a lawsuit based on these precedents and win.

***** ass mother ****er.

[Unregistered]

Why have backups on any calls? If you are ordered to enter without a backup on the highest of priority calls.....then lesser calls should be a piece of cake. Like it has been pointed out, schools are not the only place these things happen at. No call should be a higher priority than your safety. One size fits all policy with zero discretion no matter whats happening is one of the problems with this. Many of us would go above and beyond when it comes to school kids. If we made that choice and got killed, it was done willingly. The bigger point here is we are not expected by law to sacrifice ourselves. Getting killed doing this job has never been a policy requirement. Whats next, domestics, crazy people with firearms, etc. The historic precedent of this policy is your now expected to potentially sacrifice your self which is a dramatic departure from all other training you have received.

[Unregistered]

Scott Peterson, you're both a coward and a moron. How's those lawsuits working out for you? Got your job back yet? No? Good. **** you.

You are the moron.

Peterson is alive and well, retired with a fat $100k pension. The courts ruled in his favor, that he had no duty to protect anyone, therefore, no liability.

[Unregistered]

Why have backups on any calls? If you are ordered to enter without a backup on the highest of priority calls.....then lesser calls should be a piece of cake. Like it has been pointed out, schools are not the only place these things happen at. No call should be a higher priority than your safety. One size fits all policy with zero discretion no matter whats happening is one of the problems with this. Many of us would go above and beyond when it comes to school kids. If we made that choice and got killed, it was done willingly. The bigger point here is we are not expected by law to sacrifice ourselves. Getting killed doing this job has never been a policy requirement. Whats next, domestics, crazy people with firearms, etc. The historic precedent of this policy is your now expected to potentially sacrifice your self which is a dramatic departure from all other training you have received.

Yet I see little old ladies with with a bad tallight getting pulled over 4 tahoes deep. LMAO

[Unregistered]

Bob's General Counsel should read up on Warren v. The District of Columbia, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, and Castle Rock v. Gonzales. These decisions confirm that LEOs are under no obligation to protect citizens from criminals. Therefore the agency's policy is in violation of the US Supreme Court decisions. If Bob fires a deputy for failing to act, let's say in school shooting, the deputy can file a lawsuit based on these precedents and win.

Go ahead and be a coward and hide, freeze or run during an active shooter. You will be fired. You will lose your certification. You will be sued in federal and state court. There may be some case law against some events, but no event is the same. First you gave your conscience, good luck living with that. Then you gave your fellow LEO’s who will hate you for the rest of your life. Third your family, they will be embarrassed of you forever. Fourth the public will want to hang you. Fifth the media will haunt you. Sixth your job is gone and no agency will want you. At that point will a lawsuit make your life any worse? Maybe.

You are trained and equipped to respond to these rare events in a very specific manner. Good luck taking the coward’s path. I would be shocked if Peterson commits suicide.

If we lacked the training, the policies and the equipment I would say your line of thinking may have some merit. But that’s not reality.

[Unregistered]

Bob's General Counsel should read up on Warren v. The District of Columbia, DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, and Castle Rock v. Gonzales. These decisions confirm that LEOs are under no obligation to protect citizens from criminals. Therefore the agency's policy is in violation of the US Supreme Court decisions. If Bob fires a deputy for failing to act, let's say in school shooting, the deputy can file a lawsuit based on these precedents and win.

There is a BIG difference between a legal obligation that you can be sued for and just doing the right fking thing. If you think for a second that if you dont go in to a AS situation that this Sheriff will not fire your azz in heatbeat then you are dumb as dumbs is. He is has made it as clear as clear can be. If you dont want to do the job then get the fk out!!!! We got more equipment and more training then any other agency around and if you dont want to do what you signed up to do then quit. And the for the stupid azz bags comparing a AS situation to other BS calls then you are either a complete dumb azz which is very possible with your GED or you are just a pot stirrer which is also possible. Either way DO YOUR FKING JOB or QUIT.

[Unregistered]

You are the moron.

Peterson is alive and well, retired with a fat $100k pension. The courts ruled in his favor, that he had no duty to protect anyone, therefore, no liability.

Jesus Christ you ****ing *****. Please quit now you coward ass mother ****er.

[Unregistered]

Jesus Christ you ****ing *****. Please quit now you coward ass mother ****er.

Bottom line is that Sheriff Israel, the DA, the Florida AG, FDLE, etc. couldn't do squat to Peterson because he acted within the law. Even if he had not retired, had he been fired, he would have sued the pants off Israel and got paid big $$$ and his job back, if he wanted it. He probably would have taken the $$$ and ran from a corrupt and inept agency like Broward. Peterson came out the winner and Israel was booted out as sheriff despite Bob's attempted coverup. But you guys go ahead and play hero so you can keep your jobs with Bob.