Results 21 to 30 of 54
-
05-03-2019, 06:24 PM #21UnregisteredGuest
Let's assume you are an outstanding citizen. Sheriff's Deputies are called out to your house at 3 AM, because your daughter (Who is not as oustanding as you) is naked and drunk in your yard.. The deputies arrive (Cameras on) and record the whole incident, while you and your wife are screaming at you daughter, and the Deputies because you suddemly realize that everyone is being filmed... This is all public record, and the public has a right to see the video. Am I correct? Think about this..You may get what you wish for...
-
05-03-2019, 07:50 PM #22UnregisteredGuest
-
05-03-2019, 09:31 PM #23UnregisteredGuest
Yeah but corrupt politicians don't shoot and beat up people. They just steal their money.
It's all about liability. That is why LEOs should wear body cameras and agencies should not be opposed to them because cameras reduce civil and criminal liabilities. And the taxpayers and voters have a right to know how their public servants are doing their jobs.
-
05-03-2019, 10:42 PM #24UnregisteredGuest
-
05-04-2019, 12:41 AM #25UnregisteredGuest
Yes, but police get to investigate themselves and lie because there was no video. Happens every day. That's why only ONE cop in the entire state of Florida over the last 30 years was charged and convicted for killing someone. And thatonly occured because there was audio that proved the cop lied.
-
05-04-2019, 03:26 AM #26UnregisteredGuest
Eventually costs will decline further and all agencies will issue body cameras. It's just a matter of a few years for it to happen. The main reason agencies will adopt body cameras is because it makes financial sense - fewer frivolous lawsuits and fewer payouts which saves money. The other reason is that agency supervisors and command staff are better able to supervise, identify the bad apples and issue disciplinary actions for breaking agency rules. Body cameras are also useful as evidence in prosecutions. So body cameras are beneficial and getting cheaper therefore it is only a matter of time until they are issued by our agency.
-
05-04-2019, 05:07 AM #27UnregisteredGuest
Hey, moron, do you think all that video stores itself? Do you think that the camera itself has infinite memory? Nope! They require hard drives. 30 terabytes are out now in solid state drives, that means instant access, instant retrieval. They go for $12,000. So an agency that would deploy like 600 would fill that in a few weeks. So do the math tard. And there are laws in how long you must store it depending on what it recorded. So like I said, it’s not free tard. It’s a perpetual expense.
-
05-04-2019, 12:30 PM #28UnregisteredGuest
-
05-04-2019, 02:43 PM #29UnregisteredGuest
-
05-04-2019, 02:52 PM #30UnregisteredGuest
That’s an interesting story and possibly has happened at least a few hundred times in some variation in the thousands of agencies that are already using body cameras. I would say they’ve managed to figure out how to handle special cases in the best way possible but I can’t speak for them. Unfortunately you don’t have a keen grasp on state public records or logic. I can speculate with absolute certainty that not a single agency in this country would release a nude video of someone without some redacting. And, someone would have to have enough interest to request it in the first place. Is the media really interested in domestics with a nude person? No. Would a creepy neighbor be bold enough to request a copy for himself for his jollies? No. We can come up with a ton of examples that might illicit some hurt feelings... they’re still coming though!
Bookmarks