What happened in CAC? - Page 2
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58
 
  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    SO its okay to be over 100 reports down and have reports not done from 2 years ago? Yup that’s the COC fault. You can play juvenile games and call people stupid names but when the alimighty SGT and DET that you speak of are not doing reports for 2 years that’s f*ked up. But you’re right, “good stuff and dead on”. You wud be right if they hit them hard for being down reports for 30-60 days but years worth. NOT. Keep the name calling and juvenile BS going but in the meantime do your F*king job and GROW UP.
    The name calling was 100% accurate too. Fat Kurt would explode if he had to work the road again. Luckily he stole LT bars managing the
    Comm Center and ILP. Two places that give you tons of law enforcement experience. Then apparently Dennis Garvey pissed someone off because he was totally in line for the IOB captain slot. That promotion stumped everyone. Maybe Dennis looks too fit which makes Bald Larry and Gyro eating George look bad. And how did a guy with limited road experience, very limited supervisory experience make sergeant in CAC???? That was unfair to him to start with. That should be an experienced sergeant’s position. That’s another example of “you’ll be fine, let us know if you need anything,” as they push you into rapids and expect you to walk on water. “Go do your ****ing job!” That’s great advice. Too bad idiots in the command staff don’t follow that advice. Their saying is, “Dodge, Duck, Dive and blame everyone under you for it.”

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    I will not name names but about 6-7 years ago there was a sergeant who did not do 4 reports and admitted to IAD that he failed to do 7 others, total of 11 reports. He got a Level 5 and was demoted to deputy at his ARB. A year later he failed to do another report and falsified information on a second report, for which he was fired.

    Heads must roll again if Bob were to play it straight.

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    That sergeant was not black and wasn’t pushed into his role. It I agree, they love to mix it up. If this place ever followed a policy in discipline it wouldn’t have anyone left. Two people can violate the same policy and get totally different outcomes. But Bob loves to purge units. And that draws the best people to put in for the vacancies.

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I will not name names but about 6-7 years ago there was a sergeant who did not do 4 reports and admitted to IAD that he failed to do 7 others, total of 11 reports. He got a Level 5 and was demoted to deputy at his ARB. A year later he failed to do another report and falsified information on a second report, for which he was fired.

    Heads must roll again if Bob were to play it straight.
    They weren’t failing to do reports, they pulled the report supplements, but weren’t able to get some done right away because more immediate stuff kept coming in and the unit was down several people for months. They should have been given some time, even a week, to get caught up once the unit was fully staffed. And they weren’t 2 years behind, that’s laughable.

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Here are some facts boys and girls:

    There are quote a few good "hiding spots" throughout this agency. Some are officially created and some are internally created outside the administration's radar. Nobody bothers to investigate these because the command staff is too concerned about making money, kissing Bob's butt and doing as little as possible so that attitude carries over to their subordinates. Bob's erratic and maniacal behavior only reinforces that if you want a long career you are better off in one of these hiding spots where you don't have to stick your neck out and possibly get in trouble, because nobody will back you up. While I ethically disagree with being a lazy slug, there is some logic other than utter laziness which dictates these people's behavior to seek and create hiding spots for themselves.

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    So another ejected early sergeant promotion hits the road. Maybe the executive staff should promote those with experience and passing test scores in stead of promoting people because they have SOME specialized experience. Maybe tenure, experience and longevity are more valuable than some time in as a detective. Good leaders can manage anything. Making a detective a sergeant because they have some experience in the unit does not make a good leader. Then you wonder why they fail.

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest
    I love that the third floor still thinks being shipped to patrol is punishment. Haaaaa. Everyone that leaves CID or CED finds out that Patrol is a blessing and they love it. More money and work only 15 days a month. They still have that old school mentality, and they still can’t figure out why people aren’t putting in for CID or CED.

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I love that the third floor still thinks being shipped to patrol is punishment. Haaaaa. Everyone that leaves CID or CED finds out that Patrol is a blessing and they love it. More money and work only 15 days a month. They still have that old school mentality, and they still can’t figure out why people aren’t putting in for CID or CED.
    How do the shifts work out to 15 days a month on patrol?

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I love that the third floor still thinks being shipped to patrol is punishment. Haaaaa. Everyone that leaves CID or CED finds out that Patrol is a blessing and they love it. More money and work only 15 days a month. They still have that old school mentality, and they still can’t figure out why people aren’t putting in for CID or CED.
    CID is a disaster. One guy who left CID told me he couldn't get out fast enough. Patrol is a definite improvement but he ended up as a bailiff which is cake.

  10. #20
    Unregistered
    Guest
    IOB is a disaster zone because the emperor can’t let the detectives be detectives. You see, a little knowledge is dangerous. And that’s what the Sheriff and Chiefs have, a little knowledge. Detectives, who do this for a living, can’t make any major decisions. And God help them when a major car doesn’t get solved. That’s when the second guessing and Monday morning quarter backing starts by the all knowing Sheriff and Chiefs. This agency is run by a dictator who does not trust anyone below him to make any kind of important decision. And that may be his right as Sheriff, but that makes him a terrible leader. Good leaders know they cannot know everything all the time. They know they must rely on the experts to make the calls. But that does not happen here. Honestly that hurts the agency and makes cases take longer than they should. The public won’t know that, but that’s what happens. And Larry Nalven is a joke. Thanks Dan for another Nalven to tolerate. Jesus was their mom that good to you? Does your wife know about your infatuation?

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •