Just so We Are Clear.....
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Just so We Are Clear.....

    When you see someone not wearing their seat belt, for their own safety, you chase them with the emergency lights off at over 100mph and smash into their car until you can get it to roll over, for their safety? Because they were not wearing their seat belt?

    https://pcsoweb.com/Data/Sites/1/med...5WiCG400UJQ7aI

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    9200 Payroll in a specialized unit? Please tell me he did at leasT 10 years somewhere else?

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    9200 Payroll in a specialized unit? Please tell me he did at leasT 10 years somewhere else?
    Disciplinary action shall be consistent with progressive discipline, for cause in accordance with ;:OViSionsoftheP~?CountyCivilServiceAct.

    This VCTF (visor down) squad have been violating pursuit policy for years. There is nothing that is consistent with these clowns. I guess this gross violation of policy was to much to be swept under the carpet. A bunch of hired guns for ST Pete. I guess Paul had to make it look good. If said deputy gets fired I would like to here from him so he can tell everyone the real workings of the VCTF. Bob tell St. Pete to get someone else to do their dirty work.

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    When you see someone not wearing their seat belt, for their own safety, you chase them with the emergency lights off at over 100mph and smash into their car until you can get it to roll over, for their safety? Because they were not wearing their seat belt?

    https://pcsoweb.com/Data/Sites/1/med...5WiCG400UJQ7aI
    The driver of the car committed a felony by fleeing from the deputies who initially tried to stop him. This PIT and ramming were after the driver had already ran before. He didn’t run for a seatbelt he had shyt in the car when he was arrested. Go push your anti cop propoganda somewhere else.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The driver of the car committed a felony by fleeing from the deputies who initially tried to stop him.
    If that were the case, there could be no "No Chase" policy because every chase was a felony moron.

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    This PIT and ramming were after the driver had already ran before. He didn’t run for a seatbelt he had shyt in the car when he was arrested. Go push your anti cop propoganda somewhere else.
    And Curry knew that while he was chasing and ramming the car? No. All Curry knew was the seat belt violation and it is the initial contact violation that determines the no-chase policy, moron.

    It's not "anti-cop" propaganda when a deputy drives like an idiot endangering dozens of people's lives over a seat belt violation, moron.

    You must be Curry. LOL

    Oh, and how do you misspell propaganda when this cite has spellcheck? Moron.

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    If that were the case, there could be no "No Chase" policy because every chase was a felony moron.
    We don’t have a “No chase policy” we have a policy that limits what you can “chase” for. Big difference. if you were a cop and had half a brain and a pair of balls you would know that.

    Do you ever wonder how your life could be different if you weren’t a little cop hating, cuck b!tch? Seriously do you ever wonder that?

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    And Curry knew that while he was chasing and ramming the car? No. All Curry knew was the seat belt violation and it is the initial contact violation that determines the no-chase policy, moron.

    It's not "anti-cop" propaganda when a deputy drives like an idiot endangering dozens of people's lives over a seat belt violation, moron.

    You must be Curry. LOL

    Oh, and how do you misspell propaganda when this cite has spellcheck? Moron.
    Probably the same way you misspell site when this site has spell check... Moron

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The driver of the car committed a felony by fleeing from the deputies who initially tried to stop him. This PIT and ramming were after the driver had already ran before. He didn’t run for a seatbelt he had shyt in the car when he was arrested. Go push your anti cop propoganda somewhere else.
    That's not what the IA investigation said. But then again, I don't believe that any PCSO IA investigation is accurate or truthful. Good luck on your suspension or firing.

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Reality is had he done the same thing in a UC car it would have never hit the news. If you are in a marked cruiser doing all that it’s a pursuit. If you are in a UC car it’s called “mobile surveillance”. Yeah maybe mobile high speed surveillance. What a bunch of bullshit. Hanging one guy out for what VCTF has been allowed to do for 3 years now.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •