+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Second Female being interviewed at this time

    This is going to be getting interesting, a second female is coming forward. The #metoo movement and should break by next week.

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    This is going to be getting interesting, a second female is coming forward. The #metoo movement and should break by next week.
    And this would surprise whom?

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest

    What about poor fat ass Eric???

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    This is going to be getting interesting, a second female is coming forward. The #metoo movement and should break by next week.
    More to Come
    Oh no not another(fat) one
    Eric Smith vs Carmine Marceno
    004924 : Smith, Eric (Fat ass) Petitioner vs Marceno, Carmine Respondent
    Private Paternity/Disestablishment of Paternity
    Date Filed:
    11/05/2018
    Location:
    Div C
    UCN:
    362018DR004924A001CH
    Judge:
    Elisabeth Adams
    Status:
    Filed
    Citation Number:
    Appear By Date:

    11/05/2018 Notice of Related Cases 1
    11/05/2018 Notice of Social Security Number (Secured) 1
    11/05/2018 Notice of Appearance 1
    11/05/2018 Standing Order for Parenting Course with Minor Children 1
    11/05/2018 Notice to Parties Pursuant to FS 742.021 1
    11/05/2018 Civil Cover Sheet 2
    11/05/2018 Standing Temporary Order for Paternity 2
    11/05/2018 Uniform Child Custody Affidavit 3
    11/05/2018 Summons Submitted for Issuance - New Case 3
    11/05/2018 Petition 4

    Eric Smith claims Carmine impregnated him multiple times. That the big disgusting gut is Carmines baby and not just disgusting fat. Smith claims he has also aborted a past Carmine baby and will not do this again.

    If your that vile to KILL Your Child, then your just a Piece of Sh .. Anyone that knowing demands that his child be aborted is a murderer.

    And you retaliate against her by having your cronies damage her reputation as a defense about your actions ????

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    AUGUST 26--Facing a lawsuit accusing him of sexual assault, baseball star Johan Santana has asked a Florida judge to cloak video depositions, transcripts, and other court filings from public view, claiming that the alleged victim is “DETERMINED TO TRY THIS CASE IN THE MEDIA”.

    In a motion filed last week in Circuit Court, the New York Mets pitcher requested a protective order barring Deanna Williams and her lawyers from the “publication or dissemination” of a variety of material associated with the case.

    In her complaint, Williams accused the 32-year-old athlete of sexual battery, assault, and false imprisonment in connection with an October 2009 encounter on a Fort Myers golf course. Williams told cops that Santana attacked her despite her saying, "please, no," and "please no, not like this, not here, please no." She added that after Santana finished assaulting her, "Johan told me 'this is crazy' and 'I'm sorry.'"

    Santana, who is married with three children, told police who investigated Williams’s allegation that the pair’s sexual activity was consensual. He claimed that she "seemed very excited and forward towards me,” and was “very excited and was 'masturbating' as we engaged in sexual intercourse."

    Answering her lawsuit, Santana charged that, “Williams’ sole purpose in making up these allegations” was to “extort…substantial sums of money.” In a counterclaim, he accused Williams of defamation and malicious prosecution. In response to Santana’s contention that his “good name” and “reputation” had been damaged by Williams’s claims, her lawyers shot back that any such damages “are the result of his admitted adultery and impregnating a woman not his wife.”

    Prosecutors declined to pursue charges against Santana since they believed there was "not enough evidence to prove lack of consent."

    In his August 17 motion, Santana notes that since the civil case “has received national and local media attention,” there is “heightened potential for this normally private exchange of information to become public.” Santana’s motion came after a judge ruled that he had to provide Williams with documents detailing his efforts to reach a financial settlement of her claim (both before and after the lawsuit’s filing).

    Cloak was granted.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    WTF, what happened to that kid and the one in 2016?

    In response to Santana’s contention that his “good name” and “reputation” had been damaged by Williams’s claims, her lawyers shot back that any such damages “are the result of his admitted adultery and impregnating a woman not his wife.”

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    WTF, what happened to that kid and the one in 2016?

    In response to Santana’s contention that his “good name” and “reputation” had been damaged by Williams’s claims, her lawyers shot back that any such damages “are the result of his admitted adultery and impregnating a woman not his wife.”
    Different Deanna Williams a black women

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Williams says Marceno has insisted she terminate the pregnancy so vigorously, that's she's scared. She said, "I am concerned about his level of desperation, the tone in his voice, the panic, that abortion was the only way. He was so adamant that anything else was absolutely wrong, that I could not have this child, that I would not have this child, that I would not, under any circumstances."

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Where did the kid go from the baseball player? It clearly states she was impregnated by him? Hmmmmmm

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    If you pay her enough money she will tell you who is behind this!!! Interesting

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Probably a ex employee that this agency f@@@ and they can not do anything to him.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •