0.00333333% per year for 3 year contract. - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
 
  1. #11
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    John ain’t no hot. o Ron. He hasn’t got us shit for years. Only making himself fat there at the PBA. Not saying that the new crew is any better, but don’t start making Fat John out like he is great.
    I seem to remember getting a 4% raise in oct 2016. That contract also had a bunch of other perks like an additional night differential step and other goodies. More importantly that was at the height of PBA’s fight with Giménez.
    And, prior to that I remember us getting 13% back that Giménez didn’t want us to have in the first place.
    So, if you’re sucking him off shouldn’t you be able to get a much more lucrative office.
    I do remember Stahl taking pictures with the guy all over the place and him saying you get more with honey. Well, where’s the more?

  2. #12
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    John was not the best rick scott screwed us as did gimenez all under john what did that fat ***** do ???? Nada crickets
    He beat him down with lawsuits, got us back everything that Giménez strip is of 13% wage increase, plenty of money perks and a 4% wage increase oct 2016. For everyone. No fracuturing of the unit. That’s what John did and Steadman is incapable of doing.
    They key: one did much better fighting Giménez and the other is doing worse sucking Giménez off.
    In the end, he may not like you but he respects someone who will confront him like River did. He has no respect for “prey” which is what Steadman is to him.

  3. #13
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    He beat him down with lawsuits, got us back everything that Giménez strip is of 13% wage increase, plenty of money perks and a 4% wage increase oct 2016. For everyone. No fracuturing of the unit. That’s what John did and Steadman is incapable of doing.
    They key: one did much better fighting Giménez and the other is doing worse sucking Giménez off.
    In the end, he may not like you but he respects someone who will confront him like River did. He has no respect for “prey” which is what Steadman is to him.
    John ****ed our insurance and let go of the retro 4% insurance money stolen from us, so stfu he's not better than the current group either.

  4. #14
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    John ****ed our insurance and let go of the retro 4% insurance money stolen from us, so stfu he's not better than the current group either.
    https://www.miamidade.gov/humanresou...-rank-file.pdf

    Read for yourself. Article 35 & 36 specifically. You’ll see what a bag of lying crap Stahl, Greenwell and others are. And they are lying about the 1% wage increase as something spectacular. What a joke. A no vote sends him a message that he has to earn his stipend

  5. #15
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    https://www.miamidade.gov/humanresou...-rank-file.pdf

    Read for yourself. Article 35 & 36 specifically. You’ll see what a bag of lying crap Stahl, Greenwell and others are. And they are lying about the 1% wage increase as something spectacular. What a joke. A no vote sends him a message that he has to earn his stipend
    That wAs 4% that was given back in concessions and just returned to the members, along with Health insurance changes.. insurance went up to get that 4% back... Night differential and other benefits were already set to be returned that was not anything "new"... It's time to move forward..

  6. #16
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    That wAs 4% that was given back in concessions and just returned to the members, along with Health insurance changes.. insurance went up to get that 4% back... Night differential and other benefits were already set to be returned that was not anything "new"... It's time to move forward..
    I don’t know what lawyer is reading that that way-probably the same one that wrote the summary. It was a4% cola. Yours is a 1 % cola

  7. #17
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Be careful and think hard about your vote on this contract.. If we deny this contract and Amendment 1 on the ballot passes we might not get a better contract. AMENDMENT 1 would increase homestead exemption by an additional $25K. Meaning less revenue for the county. If the county gets less money the mayor will have to either raise taxes or be less generous to us

  8. #18
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Be careful and think hard about your vote on this contract.. If we deny this contract and Amendment 1 on the ballot passes we might not get a better contract. AMENDMENT 1 would increase homestead exemption by an additional $25K. Meaning less revenue for the county. If the county gets less money the mayor will have to either raise taxes or be less generous to us
    You guys are super up the mayors butt if you consider a 1% “generous”. The mayor has said repeatedly that the county is in great financial situation which is why he gave himself a 67% raise. The PBA uses some interesting words to describe their contract which are insulting. “Generous offer” and “paying you your worth” are just a couple. Its a horrible non-generous offer. If you all are afraid to negotiate with Gimenez hire a,professional negotiating team.

  9. #19
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I don’t know what lawyer is reading that that way-probably the same one that wrote the summary. It was a4% cola. Yours is a 1 % cola
    Ned to hire an outside lawyer

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •