+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 130
 
  1. #21
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    So I take it you have looked at the SOP's for 100% of the LEO agencies in the US? Really? And 90% of them state "UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MOVING VEHICLES TO BE FIRED UPON, ONCE THEY PASS YOU."
    According to Bob, SOPs and General Orders are only guidelines to be deviated by him when it protects his political career. Know matter if it's a use of force, pursuit or improper handling of a investigation he and he only will decide the punishment of the suspected offender.

  2. #22
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Dear Fukktard,

    Wow, two whole articles. Aga8n, I would like to put your ***** ass in front of a car that is driving at you. Then let’s see what you do. And shooting at a fleeing car and one that tries to kill you are two different things. Or is that too much for your libtard faggot ass to understand?

  3. #23
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Dear Fukktard,

    Wow, two whole articles. Aga8n, I would like to put your ***** ass in front of a car that is driving at you. Then let’s see what you do. And shooting at a fleeing car and one that tries to kill you are two different things. Or is that too much for your libtard faggot ass to understand?
    Such language from a suspected police officer. You should be ashamed of yourself.i would like to put you in front of my boot and unload it into your arse. LOL

  4. #24
    Unregistered
    Guest
    You shoot at a fleeing vehicle, Bob will fire you. Especially if it suits him politically. Don't expect Bob to back you up. He will make you the sacrificial lamb.

  5. #25
    Unregistered
    Guest
    [QUOTE=Unregistered;2912279]You shoot at a fleeing vehicle, Bob will fire you. Especially if it suits him politically. Don't expect Bob to back you up. He will make you the sacrificial lamb.[/QUOTE

    Why should you be backed up if you flagrantly violate policy and there is no justification for what you did. If a car is hauling azz AWAY from you and you are not in danger and you shoot at it why should you be backed up by the boss?

  6. #26
    Unregistered
    Guest
    [QUOTE=Unregistered;2912303]
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    You shoot at a fleeing vehicle, Bob will fire you. Especially if it suits him politically. Don't expect Bob to back you up. He will make you the sacrificial lamb.[/QUOTE

    Why should you be backed up if you flagrantly violate policy and there is no justification for what you did. If a car is hauling azz AWAY from you and you are not in danger and you shoot at it why should you be backed up by the boss?
    Just keep your gun in the holster and wait until you're fired upon. Then and only then think about returning fire. If you can't resolve the situation then call your supervisor and get their advise. If your lucky it will be resolved after the supervisor calls the major. Good luck and policies are only guidelines.

  7. #27
    Unregistered
    Guest
    What good can come from shooting at a vehicle that’s already fleeing away from you? Anyone who thinks this is a good idea, needs to be in a different career! It absolutely makes zero sense to shoot after the threat departs, with no prior knowledge of an ongoing threat (racing another car does’t qualify).

    Somebody trying to get away doesn’t meet the criteria for deadly force or an ongoing threat to public safety!

    Way too many negative outcomes over any possible good outcomes!

    The only ongoing threat to officers or public safety is the shots fired at the fleeing vehicle!

  8. #28
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What good can come from shooting at a vehicle that’s already fleeing away from you? Anyone who thinks this is a good idea, needs to be in a different career! It absolutely makes zero sense to shoot after the threat departs, with no prior knowledge of an ongoing threat (racing another car does’t qualify).

    Somebody trying to get away doesn’t meet the criteria for deadly force or an ongoing threat to public safety!

    Way too many negative outcomes over any possible good outcomes!

    The only ongoing threat to officers or public safety is the shots fired at the fleeing vehicle!
    Then why don’t you become the State Attorney and prosecute officers who do this? If you feel that strongly about it put your money where your ***** mouth is. And while you are there read Graham v. Connor and suck the big one you cop block ***** ass *****.

  9. #29
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Settle down Francis
    Love Sgt. Hulka

  10. #30
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What good can come from shooting at a vehicle that’s already fleeing away from you? Anyone who thinks this is a good idea, needs to be in a different career! It absolutely makes zero sense to shoot after the threat departs, with no prior knowledge of an ongoing threat (racing another car does’t qualify).

    Somebody trying to get away doesn’t meet the criteria for deadly force or an ongoing threat to public safety!

    Way too many negative outcomes over any possible good outcomes!

    The only ongoing threat to officers or public safety is the shots fired at the fleeing vehicle!
    What if the vehicle is fleeing towards you and might run you over? The GOs say you should not put yourself in that situation. So you are still in deep doo-doo

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •