Results 11 to 20 of 45
-
04-16-2018, 01:15 AM #11BaxterGuest
-
04-16-2018, 10:49 AM #12UnregisteredGuest
You obviously didn’t read the article or watch the news video attached to the article. The bicyclist attempted to cross the roadway (not at a crosswalk), was narrowly missed by another vehicle, changed course and was then struck by the trooper. Please, don’t be one of those that reads the headline and cherry picks the info.
-
04-16-2018, 04:52 PM #13UnregisteredGuest
This still doesn't absolve the trooper of guilt. The speed has not yet been determined. I wish I lived down there because I'd document the skid marks myself. At least there is a cctv video of the incident. And great job having THI investigate. Maybe if I ever get a ticket I can have my friend determine whether or not the infraction occurred. That would be cool.
-
04-16-2018, 05:45 PM #14UnregisteredGuest
What infraction occurred? You mean 316.075(1)(a)(3).
So you're driving down the road and a cyclist darts across the road not at the crosswalk and you hit them...you would be at fault?
Name one infraction that the Trooper Violated? I can think of several the pedestrian violated. If the Trooper was speeding that will come out. However, collision still occured because the cyclist violated the Troopers right of way.
-
04-16-2018, 06:44 PM #15UnregisteredGuest
If a cyclist darts in front of me? It depends. Was I not paying attention? Was I speeding? Could it have been reasonably avoided? The only thing I haven't been able to safely avoid is a speeding ticket. I'm thinking about getting a laser jammer though (antilaser priority). 2 grand is a bit pricey considering I don't even go 6 over, but it would be worth avoiding a bitter-at-the-world trooper.
Why didn't Rosario yield the right of way to Olivares? Olivares still got in trouble. But then again Olivares isn't a trooper, and Rosarios buddies investigated.
I said he is not absolved of guilt, not that he is guilty. The Trooper could have been speeding, driving distracted or driving drowsy.
Unfortunately I've verified that FDLE is not involved in an investigation. And the PIO Comacho wouldn't even answer my questions. What a disgusting injustice this is.
-
04-16-2018, 06:50 PM #16UnregisteredGuest
-
04-16-2018, 07:17 PM #17UnregisteredGuest
You're driving down the road in your lane and you reach to change the radio station. A pedestrian darts into your lane. You happen to be going let's say 10 mph over the posted limit. You would argue that you're at fault? You clearly are only seeing fault here because it was a LEO behind the wheel. Had this been another driver you would blame the cyclist.
It's clear as day that he was almost hit by another vehicle and then struck by the Trooper.
Sounds like you need to slow down and perhaps you wouldn't have to worry about speeding tickets.
-
04-16-2018, 07:34 PM #18UnregisteredGuest
If the trooper was going 10 over then how much did his stopping distance increase? Could he have seen the individual and prevented the accident had he not been speeding? Again, for the second time, I am not saying this individual is guilty or not. I'm just saying that it's possible he's partly responsible. I'm sure his friends will conduct a totally unbiased investigation for the deceased.
-
04-16-2018, 07:37 PM #19UnregisteredGuest
-
04-16-2018, 07:46 PM #20UnregisteredGuest
About 30 feet...to answer your question but still a cut and dry violation of right away violation by the cyclist. Had the trooper been on the bicycle I'd still be saying the cyclist was at fault regardless of the vehicles speed. You, Sir, are a dumbass.
Here is what you should do. Find a busy roadway and jump out in front of the first car you think is speeding. The bigger the vehicle the better.
Bookmarks