+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 53 of 53
 
  1. #51
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    I am very proud of you that you got a degree. Too bad you were absent went they taught English and grammar. You see, there is no such phrase as would of, could od should of. The truth of the matter is that even though it sounds like two separate words it is not. It is what's called a contraction where two words are combined and use an apostrophe. Your improper use of "That WOULD OF" in your reply should actually be the word would've because we use an apostrophe to indicate either possession (e.g., Harry's book ; boys' coats ) or the omission of letters or numbers (e.g., can't ; he's ; class of ’99 ). Now I can tell you that I do my job, have been doing it for 20+ years and have seen 3 different sheriffs in my tenure. I am embarrassed at the behavior of, as you call him, MY SHERIFF toward his employees and deputies.


    I too have been here for those three Sheriffs. Get off your soap box pal. YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY. As for my grammar. You are obviously not from Florida and as for Spell check on a blog....You crack me up. Take that hatred and focus on your job. You might actually retire or stroke out. As for MR KNIGHT He is very much YOUR SHERIFF and your paycheck,pension all depends on him. At the drop of a hat with your insubordinate and degrading your boss. You are already violating general orders. Good luck with that positive attitude. You're going to need it.... OH AND PROPER GRAMMAR IS SHERIFF KNIGHT NOT MR..Just Sayn

  2. #52
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    As for MR KNIGHT He is very much YOUR SHERIFF and your paycheck, pension and all depends on him.
    Screw that and that's BS and you know it! Mr. Knight does not provide my paycheck because the taxpayers do! In fact, the taxpayers pay Mr. Knight's salary too. We are BOTH paid by taxpayers. The only difference between my paycheck and Knight's paycheck is that he commits a grand theft each and every time it is deposited in his account becasue he is ripping off the taxpayers with his idiotic court battle against the 12th Judicial Circuit which, as we all know, Knight lost. But alas, Hoffman is still pumping sunshine (legal advice) up Knight's ass -- and Knight gets a smile on his face every time Hoffman starts pumping.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    With your insubordination and degrading your boss, you are violating general orders.
    Seriously? LOL

    I am not slave chattel and Mr. Knight does not own me, nor does he own any other SSO employee. We are freed men and women. Maybe he'll battle that idiotic issue in court too. I am frankly glad the the judges ruled against Knight. I've never seen Knight get this angry or bitter about anything. He's taking it personally. Why? Answer: because Knight is angry, vindictive and bitter about losing in court IN PUBLIC.

  3. #53
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The fact of the matter is that Mr. Tom Knight must obey the court order, but he has not done so, as of January 5, 2018.

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    It's now 1.12.18 and Knight is still not in compliance with the court order. However, please rest assured that Knight will buckle, bend and yield to a greater authority! Oh yes!

    Tom, you've been a bully since high school and law enforcement is definitely the wrong occupation for an angry little man, such as yourself. You're anger, vindictiveness and stubbornness have no legitimate business in public service.

    • Tom, the appellate court ruled against you.
      .
    • CCW permit holders will not be allowed to bring their guns, knives and clubs inside court facilities, to include being barred from the Sarasota Clerk of Court building.
      .
    • You will obey the panel of multiple judges, to the exact specifications of the court order.
      .
    • Tom, there are no ifs, ands or buts about this. Not even a maybe. Period. Get over it.

    Hey Kurt Hoffman:

    • You are obviously responsible for leading Tom down this legal path of idiotic nonsense and gross incompetence. Who looks like the bigger clown now? You or Tom? Who is running the bigger circus act now? You or Tom or both of you?
      .
    • You didn't get your way, but "you still just don't get it," which is why Tom now has his nuts in a meat grinder.
      .
    • Kurt, the only compelling argument that you've made is that Knight is a circus ringmaster extraordinaire.

    This is the Greatest Show on Earth! The circus act must go on!
    I am not allowed to disclose any information on leoaffairs. I have given my word. Having said that... I agree 100% with the information that is written above.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •