Results 71 to 80 of 93
-
12-07-2019, 09:44 PM #71UnregisteredGuest
Word? Who's? Lol! Have you been reading? Watching the local news? Breathing? You'll never learn because your "career" has only existed as the result of your (enthusiastically and very creatively!) participating in conduct as part of a larger "career" group of equally bad eggs. Even if there was any remote substance to your breaking news story, there would be things like consent, no exploitation elements, threats... you know... don't you? A glass house would be safer than your papermache fort in the shitbird-tree. Keep it coming, keep moving into the zone...where everything is fair game and provable. Everyone in your camp has got it all figured out because "we are too good to get caught" lol.
-
12-08-2019, 03:04 AM #72UnregisteredGuest
If that's the case, at least theres no bi-cross-contamination worries either. You must be suffering from ED and there's a cure for it. Or your issue is not physical, it's mental. Counseling. Employee Assistance type programs probably won't cover pre-existing issues or the lines between Cos-play and daily life get hard (sorry, no pun intended it's a delicate issue..) to distinguish. You're a red-blooded man, no one doubts your true innerself, really!
-
12-08-2019, 05:57 AM #73
-
12-08-2019, 06:07 AM #74UnregisteredGuest
-
12-08-2019, 02:38 PM #75UnregisteredGuest
It was sexual exploitation of at-risk woman, not "affair" or other soft word
It wasn't "screwing around", it was sexual exploitation of An at-risk woman whose addiction problems steered her into the situations where she was encountered by at least two academy trained, certified badge wearing armed predators who exploited their power, violated every sense of community faith they were instead supposed to be protectors of the most vulnerable. Instead they devalued this womans human rights through the exchange of money for sex acts performed by her. It should make one wonder if somewhere in their activities any missing at-risk women ......
-
12-08-2019, 05:43 PM #76UnregisteredGuest
-
12-08-2019, 11:09 PM #77UnregisteredGuest
-
12-09-2019, 12:02 AM #78UnregisteredGuest
Your illiteracy is "a" "embarrassmant". Perhaps there is a school for basic english syntax.
"a embarrassmant" ? "They probably secret good frends." ? You would probably know a good deal about being "secret friends" This frustrated style of of crap level writing looks familiar. Is this you "SR." ?!
-
12-09-2019, 01:19 AM #79UnregisteredGuest
Money, bets wouldn't need to go there. AA would win the debate through sleeping in. One allegedly wears clothing items typically associated with the opposite gender. Imagine someone calling them out, just lose the uniform on stage! Both sides show what they wear under their duty uniform. See who doesn't go red and blotchy and who would probably shrug and be balls enough to do it... one wears lace and soft things.
-
12-09-2019, 03:09 AM #80UnregisteredGuest
Bookmarks