+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    Stop the malicious political persecution of the top LEO NOW

    What purpose was served to extend the BS case? To keep a great story alive which should have long ago been killed off. This "investigation" that is eagerly reported in the Palm Beach paper serves an agenda it is free political advertisement for the future political ambitions of the SAO. Who better than to target than a career Sheriff who has kept the county safer than other past Sheriffs. When this all comes out, the so called "witnesses" and THEIR dirty skeletons in the laundry coming out.

    This is purely a political move by deals made by people who want to run for office in Palm Beach and here.

    Dirty Dirty Dirty. Use the government resources paid by the taxes of the people to enforce personal political dreams.

    Disgrace. Weak "case". Weaker "witnesses"

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What purpose was served to extend the BS case? To keep a great story alive which should have long ago been killed off. This "investigation" that is eagerly reported in the Palm Beach paper serves an agenda it is free political advertisement for the future political ambitions of the SAO. Who better than to target than a career Sheriff who has kept the county safer than other past Sheriffs. When this all comes out, the so called "witnesses" and THEIR dirty skeletons in the laundry coming out.

    This is purely a political move by deals made by people who want to run for office in Palm Beach and here.

    Dirty Dirty Dirty. Use the government resources paid by the taxes of the people to enforce personal political dreams.

    Disgrace. Weak "case". Weaker "witnesses"
    Says the son of Dirty Fred.....

    Your argument doesn't stand considering the trend of today's prosecutorial agencies that will shitcan a case in a heartbeat unless it is damn compelling.

    They won't spend the money or resources on it.

    So this "weak case" claim is oh should we say it? Without merit.

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Says the son of Dirty Fred.....

    Your argument doesn't stand considering the trend of today's prosecutorial agencies that will shitcan a case in a heartbeat unless it is damn compelling.

    They won't spend the money or resources on it.

    So this "weak case" claim is oh should we say it? Without merit.
    Look, here Goddamned Nancy whats her face from Court TV must be posting. "the trend of todays prosecutorial agencies....unless it is damn compelling" Well, youre damn-ed boring. Your miserable life is "without merit" Wow, you are a cunning-linguist. In whatever dive joints you prowl for dyke threesome partners for your daughter and wife, you must talk a trail of shit longer than a train load of fertilizer. Shove your legal analysis and a curling iron up your ass.

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Says the son of Dirty Fred.....

    Your argument doesn't stand considering the trend of today's prosecutorial agencies that will shitcan a case in a heartbeat unless it is damn compelling.

    They won't spend the money or resources on it.

    So this "weak case" claim is oh should we say it? Without merit.
    You dont get it. Its taxpayer dollars being spent. Theres no such thing as bad publicity this is sensationalism at its rural best. Big city style law going to clean up a supposed unclean county sheriff. This SAO just wants to be in the paper and this is a free way to do it. If this case were so string it would have been moved forward not extended. The so-called witnesses are just as dirty and tainted as the ones these witnesses pointed to. They have their own crimes and misconduct and they either co coperate or get charged on other things they did.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    You dont get it. Its taxpayer dollars being spent. Theres no such thing as bad publicity this is sensationalism at its rural best. Big city style law going to clean up a supposed unclean county sheriff. This SAO just wants to be in the paper and this is a free way to do it. If this case were so string it would have been moved forward not extended. The so-called witnesses are just as dirty and tainted as the ones these witnesses pointed to. They have their own crimes and misconduct and they either co coperate or get charged on other things they did.
    Ain't America GREAT?
    God I love this place!

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Ain't America GREAT?
    God I love this place!
    Its a shame that tax payer money is being spent to persecute a tough sheriff whos tough on crime and people respect, no one pays attention to the losers in these forums that talk smack they are the same ones who cross their legs and hold themselves when they see the sheriff or speak with him

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Look, here Goddamned Nancy whats her face from Court TV must be posting. "the trend of todays prosecutorial agencies....unless it is damn compelling" Well, youre damn-ed boring. Your miserable life is "without merit" Wow, you are a cunning-linguist. In whatever dive joints you prowl for dyke threesome partners for your daughter and wife, you must talk a trail of shit longer than a train load of fertilizer. Shove your legal analysis and a curling iron up your ass.
    It is always a reference of something shoved up the ass with you... Are common objects no longer sufficient for yours?

    Very interesting... You would be an excellent case study.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Its a shame that tax payer money is being spent to persecute a tough sheriff whos tough on crime and people respect, no one pays attention to the losers in these forums that talk smack they are the same ones who cross their legs and hold themselves when they see the sheriff or speak with him
    What do you expect them to do when the molester is present? It is a natural guarding action. Maybe he should keep his greasy fingers off of them.

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What do you expect them to do when the molester is present? It is a natural guarding action. Maybe he should keep his greasy fingers off of them.
    you certainly seem well versed in that, "family night" for you?

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    What purpose was served to extend the BS case? To keep a great story alive which should have long ago been killed off. This "investigation" that is eagerly reported in the Palm Beach paper serves an agenda it is free political advertisement for the future political ambitions of the SAO. Who better than to target than a career Sheriff who has kept the county safer than other past Sheriffs. When this all comes out, the so called "witnesses" and THEIR dirty skeletons in the laundry coming out.

    This is purely a political move by deals made by people who want to run for office in Palm Beach and here.

    Dirty Dirty Dirty. Use the government resources paid by the taxes of the people to enforce personal political dreams.

    Disgrace. Weak "case". Weaker "witnesses"
    I guess there wasn’t a little girl that was hit by a vehicle.

    I guess the suspect who is a felon wasn’t protected by the sheriff.

    I guess the paperwork made its way to the SAO but the year lost it and the sheriff is telling the truth...🙄

    I could go on and on but you get the point...

    If you ask me, you brought this on yourself...KARMA

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •