PBA continues to hurt us even when they're gone
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
 
  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    PBA continues to hurt us even when they're gone

    IUPA tried to fight to fix the promotion system where even if you score in top tier the Sheriff can pass you by and pick behind you. The Sheriffs team only had to present a PBA newsletter from years back saying they were ok with this. IUPA tried to claim they are gone and employees have a new Union that wants fair promotions.

    Arbitrator took sides with the Sheriffs skip/shuffle promotion system saying the old PBAs "newsletter" is now enshrined as official interpretation of this system.

    Thanks again PBA, even gone you still hurt us all

  2. #2
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Sounds like the PBA finally got us off "the Sheriff can pick wherever off the list" to the current system where he has to stay in top 5. Now it is IUPa job to fix it even more. It is called progessive labor negotiations.

  3. #3
    Unregistered
    Guest
    IUPA could have gone to impasse on the promotional process. That would have cost money to hire lawyers to argue in front of
    the legislative body, the county commission. Lets see. IUPA supported Commissioner Gellar's opponent. IUPA supported
    Commissioner Nan Rich's opponent in the Weston race.

    NOT looking good so far.

    SJI, the political powerhouse would prevail at this hearing without a doubt.

    IUPA =No Juice

    The best is IUPA, who is ranked 7th in America for fraudulent fundraising is now having local fundraising raffle. Follow the $ to
    Sarasota?

    Ask Deputy PP about the local charity!

  4. #4
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    IUPA tried to fight to fix the promotion system where even if you score in top tier the Sheriff can pass you by and pick behind you. The Sheriffs team only had to present a PBA newsletter from years back saying they were ok with this. IUPA tried to claim they are gone and employees have a new Union that wants fair promotions.

    Arbitrator took sides with the Sheriffs skip/shuffle promotion system saying the old PBAs "newsletter" is now enshrined as official interpretation of this system.

    Thanks again PBA, even gone you still hurt us all
    Next Eye poop Ah is going the blame the PBA for global warming. What happened to the "Professional Negotiator" Tinker Bell promised. Clearly a certified pro would have cleaned up the process at the table.

  5. #5
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Next Eye poop Ah is going the blame the PBA for global warming. What happened to the "Professional Negotiator" Tinker Bell promised. Clearly a certified pro would have cleaned up the process at the table.
    The attorney at the table was waaaay better than having fat azz MA at the table... say what u want pba but I'll keep Iupa over u

  6. #6
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    The attorney at the table was waaaay better than having fat azz MA at the table... say what u want pba but I'll keep Iupa over u
    You're not wanted back.

  7. #7
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Read the actual judgement people.... the aribitrator says that since iupa didn't bother to change the "rule of 5 language" in subsequent contacts with BSO it's their fault and said the IUPA can not achieve through arbitration what it it could not get at the bargaining table.

    Bottle line... stop shifting blame to the pba and own it iupa. If it was that big of a deal you should've changed the language in the contract or gone to impasse.

  8. #8
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Let me get this right. The PBA screwed us by writing this into existence during Lamberti and it's IUPA's fault some how? Hey PBA. Who was the bargaining unit that allowed the undefined rule of five to be implemented in the first place? Who was the bargaining unit that allowed fuel fees to be implemented? Find a way to reach the members other than lies. You guys destroyed the membership for years now you think you have clean hands? But you guys would never admit to being screw ups. And that is your biggest problem.

  9. #9
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Read the actual judgement people.... the aribitrator says that since iupa didn't bother to change the "rule of 5 language" in subsequent contacts with BSO it's their fault and said the IUPA can not achieve through arbitration what it it could not get at the bargaining table.

    Bottle line... stop shifting blame to the pba and own it iupa. If it was that big of a deal you should've changed the language in the contract or gone to impasse.


    Yup, let's go to impass and hold up raises for 1300 when only 1 person was completely skipped last test. Typical PBA mind set. If Brickman did not intentionally change the agreed rule of 5 language to pass a contract for his buddy Lamberti and say it would be corrected, we would not be arguing about this

  10. #10
    Unregistered
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Yup, let's go to impass and hold up raises for 1300 when only 1 person was completely skipped last test. Typical PBA mind set. If Brickman did not intentionally change the agreed rule of 5 language to pass a contract for his buddy Lamberti and say it would be corrected, we would not be arguing about this
    IUPA is crying about the outcome, dildo. Take ownership.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •