Another one outta here

[Unregistered]

If he has a dvi how is he still employed? You can't carry a gun if you have a dvi right?

[Unregistered]

That sucks a great question that everyone is asking....either outloud or to themselves.

[Unregistered]

That sucks a great question that everyone is asking....either outloud or to themselves.

Wtf are you talking about?

[Unregistered]

So you think someone should automatically lose their job when they haven't had their day in court? If there is a permanent DVI awarded he will probably be out of a job, but he hasn't had his side heard yet. He wasn't prosecuted criminally. I hope no of you ever find yourselves in a similar situation. Allegations without evidence can be hurtful to any of our careers. I say that because I am assuming there was not enough evidence for a criminal case since charges were not filed by the state attorneys office. So let him have his day in court.

[Unregistered]

Wtf are you talking about?

Omg, that was supposed to say.... that's such a great question.

[Unregistered]

Omg, that was supposed to say.... that's such a great question.

That is too funny!

[Unregistered]

Charges weren't filed because of who he is and the good ol boy system is in play.

[Unregistered]

So everyone is in this together to cover it up for him? That is insanity. Why would the State Attorney go along with such a scheme? They have nothing to benefit from it and everything to lose if they were to do such a thing. I feel that your statement is letting your inner snowflake to be exposed. I didn't get what I wanted so it must me a big conspiracy. Maybe there just wasn't enough evidence to substantiate the claims. That is what we deal with, Probable Cause. If it isn't there it isn't there.

[Unregistered]

It is highly doubtful the SAO was part of it. But if they received a report that is half assed and written to mitigate TG's behavior, then no charges would be filed. What I find interesting is how they went the route they did. He said/she said coupled with injuries is a no brainer: someone usually goes to jail 99% of the time. However, in this case, the sheriff chose to have the SAO review the case. Any report can be fudged to keep the bad guy from taking a ride.

Is there a conglomerate;between S.O. and SAO? Doubtful. Maybe more in-house is the most likely approach. But who knows?

[Unregistered]

From what I hear it was a he said she said and no evidence of injuries. Unless we were there or investigated the case we really don't know. I wasn't there and I didn't investigate the case. So I will have to say that our investigations unit, who investigated this case, per policy, did not find evidence that substantiated probable cause. Once it is all said and done do a freedom of information request and get a copy of the report and come to your own conclusion.